Trump just confirmed it.

[gipper]

One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench

One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

Right, because America would be better off with Marxist loving Socialist who wants to shut America down and have it serve China.

Sweet Jesus..... the enemy within.

If you really Joe is a “Marxist loving socialist,” you haven’t paid any attention to his 45 year track record.

I’m guessing you are an avid Fox News watcher and Rush listener. Am I right?

We know what he's saying this election.

And he’s saying nothing that could possibly be considered Marxist or socialist.

The Green New Deal is Marxist/socialist, moron.

Lol. You think Joe really backs that? Lol. Don’t be a dupe. Joe is more conservative than dumb Don.

 

[meaner gene]

Actually, no he didn't win, in fact, he lost by more than what what he lost by that night.
Two or three other INDEPENDANT counts showed that Bush had increased his lead.

Cite?

CNN.com - Bush still wins Florida in newspaper recount - April 4, 2001

Media Recount: Bush Won the 2000 Election

More than three months after Democrat Al Gore conceded the contested 2000 election, an independent hand recount of Florida's ballots released Tuesday says he would have lost anyway, even if officials would have allowed the hand count he requested.

www.pbs.org

Recount Would Have Increased Bush Win, Papers Say

Politics: His margin of victory in Florida would have hit 1,665, review of 'undervotes' finds. But Gore would gain if new tally began from scratch.

www.latimes.com

Now please, go pound sand

Poor useful idiot. Your own citation (if you read more than the headline) says Gore would have won.

However, the Herald reported that the balance would have tipped to Bush’s Democratic opponent, Vice President Al Gore, if a recount of the undervotes had been started from scratch in all 67 Florida counties using the most inclusive standards.

 

[meaner gene]

“Many Americans were asking the question, ‘What would the result be if the Florida Supreme Court’s order to conduct hand recounts in all 67 counties were carried out?’ ” Martin Baron, the Herald’s executive editor, said Tuesday. “We felt it was our responsibility to answer questions that so many people had.”

 

[bripat9643]

One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench

One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

Right, because America would be better off with Marxist loving Socialist who wants to shut America down and have it serve China.

Sweet Jesus..... the enemy within.

If you really Joe is a “Marxist loving socialist,” you haven’t paid any attention to his 45 year track record.

I’m guessing you are an avid Fox News watcher and Rush listener. Am I right?

We know what he's saying this election.

And he’s saying nothing that could possibly be considered Marxist or socialist.

The Green New Deal is Marxist/socialist, moron.

Lol. You think Joe really backs that? Lol. Don’t be a dupe. Joe is more conservative than dumb Don.

So we shouldn't believe anything Joe says?

 

[meaner gene]

Recount Would Have Increased Bush Win, Papers Say

Politics: His margin of victory in Florida would have hit 1,665, review of 'undervotes' finds. But Gore would gain if new tally began from scratch.

www.latimes.com

Now please, go pound sand

Only your citation says if the USSC had not stopped the Florida Supreme court, the recounts would have resulted in Al Gore getting more votes than George W. Bush.

 

[bripat9643]

“Many Americans were asking the question, ‘What would the result be if the Florida Supreme Court’s order to conduct hand recounts in all 67 counties were carried out?’ ” Martin Baron, the Herald’s executive editor, said Tuesday. “We felt it was our responsibility to answer questions that so many people had.”

The result would be violating the Constitution. That's why it didn't happen, dumbass.

 

[SmokeALib]

One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench

Why in hell would anybody want a worthless leftist traitor on the supreme court?
TRUMP 2020.

 

[MarathonMike]

One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench

One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

Right, because America would be better off with Marxist loving Socialist who wants to shut America down and have it serve China.

Sweet Jesus..... the enemy within.

"The enemy within". We've certainly got enough of that with The Media, Democrats, BLM and Antifa.

 

[Meister]

Actually, no he didn't win, in fact, he lost by more than what what he lost by that night.
Two or three other INDEPENDANT counts showed that Bush had increased his lead.

Cite?

CNN.com - Bush still wins Florida in newspaper recount - April 4, 2001

Media Recount: Bush Won the 2000 Election

More than three months after Democrat Al Gore conceded the contested 2000 election, an independent hand recount of Florida's ballots released Tuesday says he would have lost anyway, even if officials would have allowed the hand count he requested.

www.pbs.org

Recount Would Have Increased Bush Win, Papers Say

Politics: His margin of victory in Florida would have hit 1,665, review of 'undervotes' finds. But Gore would gain if new tally began from scratch.

www.latimes.com

Now please, go pound sand

Poor useful idiot. Your own citation (if you read more than the headline) says Gore would have won.

However, the Herald reported that the balance would have tipped to Bush’s Democratic opponent, Vice President Al Gore, if a recount of the undervotes had been started from scratch in all 67 Florida counties using the most inclusive standards.

From the source"
If a recount of Florida's disputed votes in last year's close presidential election had been allowed to proceed by the U.S. Supreme Court, Republican George W. Bush still would have won the White House, two newspapers reported Wednesday.

The Miami Herald and USA Today conducted a comprehensive review of 64,248 "undercounted" ballots in Florida's 67 counties that ended last month.

Their count showed that Bush's razor-thin margin of 537 votes -- certified in December by the Florida Secretary of State's office -- would have tripled to 1,665 votes if counted according to standards advocated by his Democratic rival, former Vice President Al Gore.

"In the end, I think we probably confirmed that President Bush should have been president of the United States," said Mark Seibel, the paper's managing editor. "I think that it was worthwhile because so many people had questions about how the ballots had been handled and how the process had worked."


The Herald is a left leaning paper.




According to a massive months-long study commissioned by eight news organizations in 2001, George W. Bush probably still would have won even if the U.S. Supreme Court had allowed a limited statewide recount to go forward as ordered by Florida’s highest court.

Bush also probably would have won had the state conducted the limited recount of only four heavily Democratic counties that Al Gore asked for, the study found.

The Florida Recount of 2000 - FactCheck.org

Q: When the votes were recounted in Florida, who won the 2000 presidential election? A: Nobody can say for sure who might have won. A full, official recount of all votes statewide could have gone either way, but one was never conducted. FULL ANSWER According to a massive months-long study...

www.factcheck.org

 

[meaner gene]

“Many Americans were asking the question, ‘What would the result be if the Florida Supreme Court’s order to conduct hand recounts in all 67 counties were carried out?’ ” Martin Baron, the Herald’s executive editor, said Tuesday. “We felt it was our responsibility to answer questions that so many people had.”

The result would be violating the Constitution. That's why it didn't happen, dumbass.

It was unconstitutional based on Bush V Gore, which made the assumption that the Florida legislature wanted to take advantage of 15 USC 6503, which neither the Florida legislature, or Florida supreme court claimed was their intent.

Which is why the USSC said that their decision would not be cite-able in any other election cases. And why the USSC spent years living down that decision since it violated the principle of letting states interpret their own laws.

 

[meaner gene]

Bush also probably would have won had the state conducted the limited recount of only four heavily Democratic counties that Al Gore asked for, the study found.

The Florida Recount of 2000 - FactCheck.org

Q: When the votes were recounted in Florida, who won the 2000 presidential election? A: Nobody can say for sure who might have won. A full, official recount of all votes statewide could have gone either way, but one was never conducted. FULL ANSWER According to a massive months-long study...

www.factcheck.org

Your citation also says if they did a state-wide recount, and counted all the votes, that Gore would have won.

 

[bripat9643]

“Many Americans were asking the question, ‘What would the result be if the Florida Supreme Court’s order to conduct hand recounts in all 67 counties were carried out?’ ” Martin Baron, the Herald’s executive editor, said Tuesday. “We felt it was our responsibility to answer questions that so many people had.”

The result would be violating the Constitution. That's why it didn't happen, dumbass.

It was unconstitutional based on Bush V Gore, which made the assumption that the Florida legislature wanted to take advantage of 15 USC 6503, which neither the Florida legislature, or Florida supreme court claimed was their intent.

Which is why the USSC said that their decision would not be cite-able in any other election cases. And why the USSC spent years living down that decision since it violated the principle of letting states interpret their own laws.

Only morons believe the con that the USSC doesn't rule state laws unconstitutional. See, the reason we don't have slavery anymore is the fact that the federal constitution overrules it.

If you don't take advantage of the safe harbor provision, then you're EC votes are tossed. That you don't understand that only shows what a colossal dumbass you are.

 

[bripat9643]

Bush also probably would have won had the state conducted the limited recount of only four heavily Democratic counties that Al Gore asked for, the study found.

The Florida Recount of 2000 - FactCheck.org

Q: When the votes were recounted in Florida, who won the 2000 presidential election? A: Nobody can say for sure who might have won. A full, official recount of all votes statewide could have gone either way, but one was never conducted. FULL ANSWER According to a massive months-long study...

www.factcheck.org

Your citation also says if they did a state-wide recount, and counted all the votes, that Gore would have won.

They did a recount after the fact and Gore still lost.

 

[Meister]

Bush also probably would have won had the state conducted the limited recount of only four heavily Democratic counties that Al Gore asked for, the study found.

The Florida Recount of 2000 - FactCheck.org

Q: When the votes were recounted in Florida, who won the 2000 presidential election? A: Nobody can say for sure who might have won. A full, official recount of all votes statewide could have gone either way, but one was never conducted. FULL ANSWER According to a massive months-long study...

www.factcheck.org

Your citation also says if they did a state-wide recount, and counted all the votes, that Gore would have won.

It really depends on just how they interpret what a vote is and what isn't. You're using just one standard when there were a total of 4
different standards on how a vote is counted. Three of the four standards leaned towards Bush, just one leaned for Gore.

The editor of the Miami Herald acknowledged that and stated that Bush would have won.

There it is. Cry until the cows come home if you want and you're still stuck on that one standard of voting,
which that standard was never used before in prior elections.
Have a good evening, gene.

 

[buckeye45_73]

One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench

You are a tin foil hatter if you believe the Gore-Bush decision was unjust.....
Maybe if your voters weren't ******* retards and could fill out a ballot....which reminds me, I can't wait to see you explode when you tards cant properly fill out a mail in ballot and they get dismissed.

Gore actually won.

Florida 'recounts' make Gore winner

Al Gore, not George Bush, should be sitting in the White House today as the newly elected president of the United States, two new independent probes of the disputed Florida election contest have confirmed.

www.theguardian.com

No he didn't.....I don't see Gore as President...and Gore never led once in the million ******* FL recounts.....take the dick out of your mouth and move on........

 

[CrusaderFrank]

One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench

You are a tin foil hatter if you believe the Gore-Bush decision was unjust.....
Maybe if your voters weren't ******* retards and could fill out a ballot....which reminds me, I can't wait to see you explode when you tards cant properly fill out a mail in ballot and they get dismissed.

I've been filling them out for years with no problems so I think I'm doing it right.

Sounds like you made a business out of it

 

[buckeye45_73]

One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench

You are a tin foil hatter if you believe the Gore-Bush decision was unjust.....
Maybe if your voters weren't ******* retards and could fill out a ballot....which reminds me, I can't wait to see you explode when you tards cant properly fill out a mail in ballot and they get dismissed.

Gore actually won.

Florida 'recounts' make Gore winner

Al Gore, not George Bush, should be sitting in the White House today as the newly elected president of the United States, two new independent probes of the disputed Florida election contest have confirmed.

www.theguardian.com

Actually, no he didn't win, in fact, he lost by more than what what he lost by that night.
Two or three other INDEPENDANT counts showed that Bush had increased his lead.

Well post em up, Son.

They have, BUSH won.......and he beat Kerry.... so get over it. Maybe if democrats weren't ******* retards and could actually do something simple like read a ballot...MAYBE you would have won........I can't wait for Mail in Ballots,,,,so many DQs, you guys are gonna have aneurisms......and I'm going to laugh my ass off......should have promoted in person voting

 

[flacaltenn]

One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench

One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

Yeah.. Focusing on getting re-elected by FULFILLING campaign promises and working like a dog is highly over-rated.,. And makes every other pol in DC look like a slacker..

It would be a little more inspiring if he hadn't lost the popular vote by three million votes.

Let's not pretend that he's doing this for America, writ large. That would be a lie.

He is a nationalist authoritarian, shoving it down the throats of 55% of America, and we all know it.

So much anger Jr Jedi.. Those 3 million votes is about 1/2 of the people that voted for the Libertarian and Green candidates.. She didn't win a majority of the popular vote.. That's just a sloppy math oversight on the part of partisan warriors..

I don't know what actions were not in the interests of American people. All the grief I have with him is his abrasive New Yorker demeanor... Perhaps if his campaign wasn't CRIMINALLY spied upon and his administration attacked from day one STILL by a continuing silent coup and the MEDIA wasn't aiding and abetting this "getting off on the wrong foot" -- he'd be nicer to you...

From my Liberal vantage point, our nations' trade policies HAD been sucking the life out of EVERY American supply chain that existed in EVERY market.. When you find out that 80% by volume of our medical drugs are manufactured OFFSHORE and that we couldn't even FIND any PPE for the Covid crisis -- I'm GLAD someone is fixing all that..

And even as a Libertarian, I recognize that BORDERS are called for in the Constitution.. It's a duty we make every President swear by. I'd LIKE a VERY generous immigration policy.. One that screens for crime and disease at the border and recognizes LEGAL entry...

You getting much of that since you went DarkSide? Maybe being more Independent and looking at the larger picture would fix your minor case of derangement. Not tightening up every time Donald tweets something designed to troll you...

 

[buckeye45_73]

One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench

You are a tin foil hatter if you believe the Gore-Bush decision was unjust.....
Maybe if your voters weren't ******* retards and could fill out a ballot....which reminds me, I can't wait to see you explode when you tards cant properly fill out a mail in ballot and they get dismissed.

Gore actually won.

Florida 'recounts' make Gore winner

Al Gore, not George Bush, should be sitting in the White House today as the newly elected president of the United States, two new independent probes of the disputed Florida election contest have confirmed.

www.theguardian.com

Wrong. he lost 3 times.

I posted up a link supporting my position. You're just talking outta yer ass again.

Maybe learn to read or fill out a ballot instead of learning how to burn down buildings and beat up old people

 

[meaner gene]

If you don't take advantage of the safe harbor provision, then you're EC votes are tossed. That you don't understand that only shows what a colossal dumbass you are.

You're wrong again (but that's the usual) the safe harbor clause says if all controversies are resolved before the deadline, that congress could not question the results. There is no such thing as automatic tossing of EC votes.

This is just like the protections in the speech and debate clause.