Trump just confirmed it.

So how was Obama any different? Obama sicked the IRS an TEA party groups trying to get 501-3c status.
It's 501(c)(3) And they are highly regulated.


Intervention in political campaigns or the endorsement/anti-endorsement of candidates for public office is strictly prohibited.
 
So how was Obama any different? Obama sicked the IRS an TEA party groups trying to get 501-3c status.
Yeah this is true, using the IRS to intimidate political opponents.....it's why getting rid of the Johnson amendment was so important, because the left had politicians and rallies in church all the time.
All political parties are barred from 501(c)(3) status.

Intervention in political campaigns or the endorsement/anti-endorsement of candidates for public office is strictly prohibited.
 
So how was Obama any different? Obama sicked the IRS an TEA party groups trying to get 501-3c status.
It's 501(c)(3) And they are highly regulated.


Intervention in political campaigns or the endorsement/anti-endorsement of candidates for public office is strictly prohibited.
So? How does that get the IRS and Obama off the hook for persecuting TEA party groups?
 
So how was Obama any different? Obama sicked the IRS an TEA party groups trying to get 501-3c status.
Yeah this is true, using the IRS to intimidate political opponents.....it's why getting rid of the Johnson amendment was so important, because the left had politicians and rallies in church all the time.
All political parties are barred from 501(c)(3) status.

Intervention in political campaigns or the endorsement/anti-endorsement of candidates for public office is strictly prohibited.
The TEA party is not a political party. It doesn't run candidates for office.
 

Intervention in political campaigns or the endorsement/anti-endorsement of candidates for public office is strictly prohibited.
So? How does that get the IRS and Obama off the hook for persecuting TEA party groups?
Because many of the Tea party groups violated the 501(c)(3) rule requirements by politicking.

It's just like checking if somebody who applies for un-employment is working.
 
All political parties are barred from 501(c)(3) status.

Intervention in political campaigns or the endorsement/anti-endorsement of candidates for public office is strictly prohibited.
The TEA party is not a political party. It doesn't run candidates for office.
If they endorse a candidate, that makes them ineligible for 501(c)(3) status. If they say anything for or against a political candidate, that makes them ineligible for 501(c)(3) status.

Capiche?
 
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

STFU....
No one believes you about anything since you claimed to be a centrist and yet you've come out as a flaming leftist.
 

Intervention in political campaigns or the endorsement/anti-endorsement of candidates for public office is strictly prohibited.
So? How does that get the IRS and Obama off the hook for persecuting TEA party groups?
Because many of the Tea party groups violated the 501(c)(3) rule requirements by politicking.

It's just like checking if somebody who applies for un-employment is working.
That's utter horseshit. The only thing they did is criticize Democrat politicians.
 
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.
The Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section ...
www.irs.gov › charitable-organizations › the-restriction-o...
None of them did that, moron. Do you believe the Huffington Post and Media Matters should have their status revoked?
 
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
You are a tin foil hatter if you believe the Gore-Bush decision was unjust.....
Maybe if your voters weren't fucking retards and could fill out a ballot....which reminds me, I can't wait to see you explode when you tards cant properly fill out a mail in ballot and they get dismissed.
Gore actually won.

 
All political parties are barred from 501(c)(3) status.

Intervention in political campaigns or the endorsement/anti-endorsement of candidates for public office is strictly prohibited.
The TEA party is not a political party. It doesn't run candidates for office.
If they endorse a candidate, that makes them ineligible for 501(c)(3) status. If they say anything for or against a political candidate, that makes them ineligible for 501(c)(3) status.

Capiche?
They don't endorse candidates any more than Media Matters or the Huffington Post does.
 
Is the OP trying to say Ginsburg's departure is a God-send, because that's what it rings like.
 
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
You are a tin foil hatter if you believe the Gore-Bush decision was unjust.....
Maybe if your voters weren't fucking retards and could fill out a ballot....which reminds me, I can't wait to see you explode when you tards cant properly fill out a mail in ballot and they get dismissed.
Gore actually won.

Wrong. he lost 3 times.
 
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
You are a tin foil hatter if you believe the Gore-Bush decision was unjust.....
Maybe if your voters weren't fucking retards and could fill out a ballot....which reminds me, I can't wait to see you explode when you tards cant properly fill out a mail in ballot and they get dismissed.
Gore actually won.

Actually, no he didn't win, in fact, he lost by more than what what he lost by that night.
Two or three other INDEPENDANT counts showed that Bush had increased his lead.
 
That's utter horseshit. The only thing they did is criticize Democrat politicians.
Forbiden:
intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.

criticizing democrats is intervening in a political campaign in opposition to a candidate for elective public office.

Verboten.
 
Well that's good, but dems are not the brightest people....it was so bad they blamed the ballots, ones that people have used for decades.....

Wait for it...and...and then Bush whooped the Dem's ass a 2nd time :auiqs.jpg: that's why Trump whooping their ass sent them over the edge. :auiqs.jpg:At this point the left is unhinged.
 
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
You are a tin foil hatter if you believe the Gore-Bush decision was unjust.....
Maybe if your voters weren't fucking retards and could fill out a ballot....which reminds me, I can't wait to see you explode when you tards cant properly fill out a mail in ballot and they get dismissed.
Gore actually won.

Wrong. he lost 3 times.
I posted up a link supporting my position. You're just talking outta yer ass again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top