Trump just confirmed it.

There it is. Cry until the cows come home if you want and you're still stuck on that one standard of voting,
which that standard was never used before in prior elections.
Have a good evening, gene.
What you leave out is that Florida intended for their Supreme Court to decide election disputes. Including that the standard for counting the votes is to recognize the "intent" of the voter. That was why recounts where they accepted dimpled chads, and hanging chads were counted for the recount under the Florida Supreme Court ruling.

Bush V Gore interpreted Florida election law in deference to how the Florida Supreme Court interpreted Florida election law. Adding (an unsupported) presumption that the Florida legislature intended to take advantage of the "safe harbor"
 
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

Right, because America would be better off with Marxist loving Socialist who wants to shut America down and have it serve China.

Sweet Jesus..... the enemy within.
If you really think Joe is a “Marxist loving socialist,” you haven’t paid any attention to his 45 year track record.

I’m guessing you are an avid Fox News watcher and Rush listener. Am I right?
That's how Rush and Fox have trained them.

If you're not an obedient Trump sheep, you're a radical leftist pinko Marxist Hitler Maoist Nazi socialist commie commie.

The thought processes of a child.
 
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

Yeah.. Focusing on getting re-elected by FULFILLING campaign promises and working like a dog is highly over-rated.,. And makes every other pol in DC look like a slacker..
It would be a little more inspiring if he hadn't lost the popular vote by three million votes.

Let's not pretend that he's doing this for America, writ large. That would be a lie.

He is a nationalist authoritarian, shoving it down the throats of 55% of America, and we all know it.


So much anger Jr Jedi.. Those 3 million votes is about 1/2 of the people that voted for the Libertarian and Green candidates.. She didn't win a majority of the popular vote.. That's just a sloppy math oversight on the part of partisan warriors..

I don't know what actions were not in the interests of American people. All the grief I have with him is his abrasive New Yorker demeanor... Perhaps if his campaign wasn't CRIMINALLY spied upon and his administration attacked from day one STILL by a continuing silent coup and the MEDIA wasn't aiding and abetting this "getting off on the wrong foot" -- he'd be nicer to you... :up:

From my Liberal vantage point, our nations' trade policies HAD been sucking the life out of EVERY American supply chain that existed in EVERY market.. When you find out that 80% by volume of our medical drugs are manufactured OFFSHORE and that we couldn't even FIND any PPE for the Covid crisis -- I'm GLAD someone is fixing all that..

And even as a Libertarian, I recognize that BORDERS are called for in the Constitution.. It's a duty we make every President swear by. I'd LIKE a VERY generous immigration policy.. One that screens for crime and disease at the border and recognizes LEGAL entry...

You getting much of that since you went DarkSide? Maybe being more Independent and looking at the larger picture would fix your minor case of derangement. Not tightening up every time Donald tweets something designed to troll you...
I haven't changed on one (1) issue. And if Biden wins, and when I criticize him, the Regressive Lefties will be saying I "went DarkSide".

Just the zillionth example of how similar the two ends can be in their behaviors. Those who don't obediently belong to a tribe are the bad guys.
 
What cracks me up is the ranting and raving the left and it's media outlets did in the very beginning of Trump's presidency, regarding their claim all judges are impartial and merely judge by the law and not their race or religion or origins.
This argument was against Trump complaining that "perhaps"/"maybe" the Mexican American Judge was not impartial when ruling against Trump because of media propaganda instilling that prejudiced view of his policies.
And throughout his 4 years we've seen nothing but kvetching about judges partiality by the left regarding religion, abortion views, political affiliation, gender etc.
Go figure, we caught Dems in another hypocritical stance based on flip flopping to whatever suits their tactical needs.
 
Last edited:
Getting harder to read these threads , democrats are unhinged, angry and just can't tell the truth about anything . After all the documents( you know, truth) that have been released they still talk about Russian collusion and Putin puppet.... I never seen anything like it . Bunch of violent babies.
 
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

Yeah.. Focusing on getting re-elected by FULFILLING campaign promises and working like a dog is highly over-rated.,. And makes every other pol in DC look like a slacker..
It would be a little more inspiring if he hadn't lost the popular vote by three million votes.

Let's not pretend that he's doing this for America, writ large. That would be a lie.

He is a nationalist authoritarian, shoving it down the throats of 55% of America, and we all know it.
An authoritarian oligarch government = Republican dream
And all along they were pretending to be "conservatives", pushing "conservative values" and "limited government".

It was all a lie. They wanted an arrogant, pugilistic, authoritarian, white, nationalist strongman. Like Europe, 90 years ago.

You have to admit. They fooled us. We thought they were serious.
And ever since you have been a member of this forum you have pretended you aren't a leftwing extremist.
He actually did a fair job of concealing it for awhile....But if the God Emperor has been top flight at anything, it has been to get leftist freak crackpots like Mac to reveal themselves for who the really are.
I certainly invite you to describe any issues on which I have changed my position.

Just name one (1). Either of you two geniuses.

Show some balls and back up your words. I'll wait here. Cool! Thanks in advance!

:popcorn:
 
Last edited:
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

Right, because America would be better off with Marxist loving Socialist who wants to shut America down and have it serve China.

Sweet Jesus..... the enemy within.
If you really Joe is a “Marxist loving socialist,” you haven’t paid any attention to his 45 year track record.

I’m guessing you are an avid Fox News watcher and Rush listener. Am I right?
We know what he's saying this election.
And he’s saying nothing that could possibly be considered Marxist or socialist.
The Green New Deal is Marxist/socialist, moron.
Lol. You think Joe really backs that? Lol. Don’t be a dupe. Joe is more conservative than dumb Don.
So we shouldn't believe anything Joe says?
Exactly. If you don’t know this about lifelong politicians by now, you might be dumber than a 6th grader.
 
What cracks me up is the ranting and raving the left and it's media outlets did in the very beginning of Trump's presidency, regarding their claim all judges are impartial and merely judge by the law and not their race or religion or origins.
This argument was against Trump complaining that "perhaps"/"maybe" the Mexican American Judge was not impartial when ruling against Trump because of media propaganda instilling that prejudiced view of his policies.
And throughout his 4 years we've seen nothing but kvetching about judges partiality by the left regarding religion, abortion views, political affiliation, gender etc.
Go figure, we caught Dems in another hypocritical stance based on flip flopping to whatever suits their tactical needs.
They all had a collective meltdown when RBG died. Why should that matter if judges are impartial and don't take race, religion or sex into consideration? Now they are grumbling about Trump's nominee being a catholic.

Dims are the ultimate hypocrites. Everything they say is a lie. The always manage to contradict themselves within weeks.
 
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

Right, because America would be better off with Marxist loving Socialist who wants to shut America down and have it serve China.

Sweet Jesus..... the enemy within.
If you really Joe is a “Marxist loving socialist,” you haven’t paid any attention to his 45 year track record.

I’m guessing you are an avid Fox News watcher and Rush listener. Am I right?
We know what he's saying this election.
And he’s saying nothing that could possibly be considered Marxist or socialist.
The Green New Deal is Marxist/socialist, moron.
Lol. You think Joe really backs that? Lol. Don’t be a dupe. Joe is more conservative than dumb Don.
So we shouldn't believe anything Joe says?
Exactly. If you don’t know this about lifelong politicians by now, you might be dumber than a 6th grader.

In other words, Joe isn't "moderate" or a "conservative." He was lying when he said he wasn't a socialist.

Thanks for admitting it.
 
There it is. Cry until the cows come home if you want and you're still stuck on that one standard of voting,
which that standard was never used before in prior elections.
Have a good evening, gene.
What you leave out is that Florida intended for their Supreme Court to decide election disputes. Including that the standard for counting the votes is to recognize the "intent" of the voter. That was why recounts where they accepted dimpled chads, and hanging chads were counted for the recount under the Florida Supreme Court ruling.

Bush V Gore interpreted Florida election law in deference to how the Florida Supreme Court interpreted Florida election law. Adding (an unsupported) presumption that the Florida legislature intended to take advantage of the "safe harbor"
The only way that Gore won was with a clear punched chad. Not sure what you're trying imply. Dimples ands hanging chad counts went to Bush.
 
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

Right, because America would be better off with Marxist loving Socialist who wants to shut America down and have it serve China.

Sweet Jesus..... the enemy within.
If you really Joe is a “Marxist loving socialist,” you haven’t paid any attention to his 45 year track record.

I’m guessing you are an avid Fox News watcher and Rush listener. Am I right?
We know what he's saying this election.
And he’s saying nothing that could possibly be considered Marxist or socialist.
The Green New Deal is Marxist/socialist, moron.
Lol. You think Joe really backs that? Lol. Don’t be a dupe. Joe is more conservative than dumb Don.
So we shouldn't believe anything Joe says?
Exactly. If you don’t know this about lifelong politicians by now, you might be dumber than a 6th grader.

In other words, Joe isn't "moderate" or a "conservative." He was lying when he said he wasn't a socialist.

Thanks for admitting it.
Yet another example of how Joe and Don are alike. Both lie with impunity. I’m guessing you don’t agree.
 
One of the ideas put forth as to why they are fighting like hell to get another right winger on the SCOTUS before the election was to insure another Bush-Gore decision if it got that far. The tin foil hats denied it but here is Trump practically saying the same thing...Trump says he'll accept a 2020 decision from the Supreme Court — after getting his nominee on the bench
One of the most consistent observations made by people who have formerly worked with him in the administration is that, by far, his top priority is being re-elected. So it's safe to assume that he's going to do whatever it takes. Literally. His ego would be far too damaged and fragile for him to admit defeat.

Right, because America would be better off with Marxist loving Socialist who wants to shut America down and have it serve China.

Sweet Jesus..... the enemy within.
If you really Joe is a “Marxist loving socialist,” you haven’t paid any attention to his 45 year track record.

I’m guessing you are an avid Fox News watcher and Rush listener. Am I right?
We know what he's saying this election.
And he’s saying nothing that could possibly be considered Marxist or socialist.
The Green New Deal is Marxist/socialist, moron.
Lol. You think Joe really backs that? Lol. Don’t be a dupe. Joe is more conservative than dumb Don.
So we shouldn't believe anything Joe says?
Exactly. If you don’t know this about lifelong politicians by now, you might be dumber than a 6th grader.

In other words, Joe isn't "moderate" or a "conservative." He was lying when he said he wasn't a socialist.

Thanks for admitting it.
Yet another example of how Joe and Don are alike. Both lie with impunity. I’m guessing you don’t agree.
Again, thanks for admitting that Joe is a liar.
 
There it is. Cry until the cows come home if you want and you're still stuck on that one standard of voting,
which that standard was never used before in prior elections.
Have a good evening, gene.
What you leave out is that Florida intended for their Supreme Court to decide election disputes. Including that the standard for counting the votes is to recognize the "intent" of the voter. That was why recounts where they accepted dimpled chads, and hanging chads were counted for the recount under the Florida Supreme Court ruling.

Bush V Gore interpreted Florida election law in deference to how the Florida Supreme Court interpreted Florida election law. Adding (an unsupported) presumption that the Florida legislature intended to take advantage of the "safe harbor"
What you leave out is the USSC told them once to count the votes in accordance with existing law, which the democrats running the various election boards and the Florida Supreme Court promptly ignored.

The ultimate ruling was the correct ruling.
 

Forum List

Back
Top