Trump is now at war with "spitters"

[Luckyone]

No, but couple that with the frozen water bottles and the cement blocks being thrown?
Not to mention the Ca. governor and the LA mayor not doing a damn thing about the insurrection,
Fuck yeah, that is enough.
Are you really this stupid, Luckyone? It sure sounds like you are.

You righties are ALWAYS in favor of the U.S. being a Republic in which every State runs their own authority, and yet here you are in favor of the Government getting involved in spite of the fact that the Governor did not request the help.

You are a hypocrite to the nth degree.

 

[Roudy]

Reason enough to call in the National Guard?

Maybe throwing smashed concrete blocks on people and vehicles like wild animals is reason enough?

 

[Meister]

You righties are ALWAYS in favor of the U.S. being a Republic in which every State runs their own authority, and yet here you are in favor of the Government getting involved in spite of the fact that the Governor did not request the help.

You are a hypocrite to the nth degree.

Actually, there is a place for the federal government to get involved, especially when
a mayor and Governor fail to protect it's people, businesses, personal property
and federal buildings.

You really are blinded by party over country. That is sad, but, that is the democrat/communist
party we have today.

 

[Luckyone]

Actually, there is a place for the federal government to get involved, especially when
a mayor and Governor fail to protect it's people, businesses, personal property
and federal buildings.

You really are blinded by party over country. That is sad, but, that is the democrat/communist
party we have today.

well then and using your post, show me where the Governor "failed to protect its people, business, personal property". Use the existing laws and guidelines to prove your point. You cannot just use the fact that they were protesting violently, because then explain why Trump did not call the National Guard and the military when they invaded the Capitol.

 

[luiza]

With that kind of a statement, you better prove it or you will leave yourself open to a defamation lawsuit.

Conspiracy Theorist and Troll Bot Mucky getting desperate --- as people see him in his true colours .
A paid Troll Bot spreading Fake News

 

[Meister]

well then and using your post, show me where the Governor "failed to protect its people, business, personal property". Use the existing laws and guidelines to prove your point. You cannot just use the fact that they were protesting violently, because then explain why Trump did not call the National Guard and the military when they invaded the Capitol.

Who was it that told the LAPD to stand down? Bass
Who allowed the riots to continue night 1 and night 2? Bass and Newscum
Trump called for the NG to protect ICE.

Jan 6? It was proven that Trump did offer NG, Nan' declined the offer.

Don't let the facts get in the way of your yarn.

 

[Ropey]

If they spit.

You hit.

I've followed that bit of wisdom since I was a very young boy and only added to the list of those to be hit.

 

[Luckyone]

Who was it that told the LAPD to stand down? Bass
Who allowed the riots to continue night 1 and night 2? Bass and Newscum
Trump called for the NG to protect ICE.

Jan 6? It was proven that Trump did offer NG, Nan' declined the offer.

Don't let the facts get in the way of your yarn.

Total bullshit of the bolded post and all the rest, you did not offer what I asked, which was LEGAL (based on the law) proof that the situation required ignoring Newsom's statement that he did not need the NG.

One good thing is that supposedly tomorrow (Thursday) we will know the results of Newsom's lawsuit against Trump on sending the NG without Newsom's approval and our discussion will be resolved.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Total bullshit of the bolded post and all the rest, you did not offer what I asked, which was LEGAL (based on the law) proof that the situation required ignoring Newsom's statement that he did not need the NG.

One good thing is that supposedly tomorrow (Thursday) we will know the results of Newsom's lawsuit against Trump on sending the NG without Newsom's approval and our discussion will be resolved.

Newsome is indulging in obstruction of justice.

 

[Luckyone]

Newsome is indulging in obstruction of justice.

Your OPINION does not make it true.

 

[Meister]

Total bullshit of the bolded post and all the rest, you did not offer what I asked, which was LEGAL (based on the law) proof that the situation required ignoring Newsom's statement that he did not need the NG.

One good thing is that supposedly tomorrow (Thursday) we will know the results of Newsom's lawsuit against Trump on sending the NG without Newsom's approval and our discussion will be resolved.

Whatever, dude.
You lack common sense, don't believe your lying eyes.

 

[Luckyone]

Whatever, dude.
You lack common sense, don't believe your lying eyes.

Then why do you believe Trump? Are your eyes lying to you?

There are hundreds of videos of him talking garbage, lies, and shit and your eyes ignore it!

 

[Meister]

Total bullshit of the bolded post and all the rest, you did not offer what I asked, which was LEGAL (based on the law) proof that the situation required ignoring Newsom's statement that he did not need the NG.

One good thing is that supposedly tomorrow (Thursday) we will know the results of Newsom's lawsuit against Trump on sending the NG without Newsom's approval and our discussion will be resolved.

Keep denying that Trump offered National Guard prior to Jan 6.
It's what you do.

Transcripts Show President Trump's Directives to Pentagon Leadership to "Keep January 6 Safe" Were Deliberately Ignored

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration

cha.house.gov

Jan. 6 committee kept a lid on testimony Trump pushed for extra troops at Capitol

The Democrat-run House Jan. 6 committee suppressed testimony about President Trump pushing for National Guard troops to protect the U.S. Capitol on the day of the riot.

www.washingtontimes.com

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Your OPINION does not make it true.

.

Nor does your cult's opinion.




.

 

[Luckyone]

Keep denying that Trump offered National Guard prior to Jan 6.
It's what you do.

Transcripts Show President Trump's Directives to Pentagon Leadership to "Keep January 6 Safe" Were Deliberately Ignored

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration

cha.house.gov

Jan. 6 committee kept a lid on testimony Trump pushed for extra troops at Capitol

The Democrat-run House Jan. 6 committee suppressed testimony about President Trump pushing for National Guard troops to protect the U.S. Capitol on the day of the riot.

www.washingtontimes.com

From your own link:

This above was done 3 days before the attack on the Capitol.

Nonetheless, on the day of the attack and as Trump was watching the violence, Trump did nothing, even though he was begged to do so.

Why did Donald Trump deploy the National Guard to LA protest, but not on Jan 6? asks Nancy Pelosi​

and

"On January 6th...we begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it."​

and

Pelosi hits Trump on LA: Where was National Guard on Jan. 6​

Bottom line, this proves that Trump is a con artist that tries to SELL lies to Americans to gain their votes and support, but when things are ACTUALLY needed, he does nothing.

LA was not needed but he sent the NG in for SHOW!!

If you are so blind to common sense, there is nothing anyone can say to you contrary to what you WANT to hear.

 

[skye]

 

[Meister]

From your own link:

View attachment 1122285

This above was done 3 days before the attack on the Capitol.

Nonetheless, on the day of the attack and as Trump was watching the violence, Trump did nothing, even though he was begged to do so.

Why did Donald Trump deploy the National Guard to LA protest, but not on Jan 6? asks Nancy Pelosi​

and

"On January 6th...we begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it."​

and

Pelosi hits Trump on LA: Where was National Guard on Jan. 6​

Bottom line, this proves that Trump is a con artist that tries to SELL lies to Americans to gain their votes and support, but when things are ACTUALLY needed, he does nothing.

LA was not needed but he sent the NG in for SHOW!!

If you are so blind to common sense, there is nothing anyone can say to you contrary to what you WANT to hear.

It was explained in that link, but, you just ignored it.

WASHINGTON - Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman Barry Loudermilk (GA-11) revealed that days before January 6, 2021, President Trump met with senior Pentagon leaders urging them to do their jobs to protect lives and property. The transcripts released show Trump gave senior Pentagon leadership directives to keep January 6 peaceful - including using the National Guard - which the Pentagon leaders ignored. This revelation directly contradicts the conclusions drawn in the flawed DoD IG reporton January 6, 2021. In response to these revelations, Chairman Loudermilk released the following statement: “Pentagon leadership prioritized concerns of optics over their duty to protect lives,” said Chairman Loudermilk. “President Trump met with senior Pentagon leaders and directed them to make sure any events on January 6, 2021 were safe. It is very concerning that these Senior Pentagon officials ignored President Trump’s guidance AND misled Congressional Leaders to believe they were doing their job, when they were not. The DoD IG’s report is fundamentally flawed. It does not draw conclusions from the interviews they conducted, but pushes a narrative to keep their hands clean. We have many questions for them, and we will continue to dig until we are satisfied the American people know the truth."

 

[Meister]

From your own link:

View attachment 1122285

This above was done 3 days before the attack on the Capitol.

Nonetheless, on the day of the attack and as Trump was watching the violence, Trump did nothing, even though he was begged to do so.

Why did Donald Trump deploy the National Guard to LA protest, but not on Jan 6? asks Nancy Pelosi​

and

"On January 6th...we begged the president of the United States to send in the National Guard. He would not do it."​

and

Pelosi hits Trump on LA: Where was National Guard on Jan. 6​

Bottom line, this proves that Trump is a con artist that tries to SELL lies to Americans to gain their votes and support, but when things are ACTUALLY needed, he does nothing.

LA was not needed but he sent the NG in for SHOW!!

If you are so blind to common sense, there is nothing anyone can say to you contrary to what you WANT to hear.

Try reading in its entirety, then you get the entire context, and not just the parts for your mantra.

Jan. 6 committee kept a lid on testimony Trump pushed for extra troops at Capitol

The Democrat-run House Jan. 6 committee suppressed testimony about President Trump pushing for National Guard troops to protect the U.S. Capitol on the day of the riot.

www.washingtontimes.com

According to the transcript, a Jan. 6 committee staffer asked Mr. Ornato, “When it comes to the National Guard statement about having 10,000 troops or any other number of troops, do you recall any discussion prior to the 6th about whether and how many National Guard troops to deploy on Jan. 6?”
Mr. Ornato said he remembered a conversation between White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser.

“He was on the phone with her and wanted to make sure she had everything that she needed,” he said. “I remember the number 10,000 coming up, you know, ‘The president wants to make sure that you have enough.’ You know, ‘He is willing to ask for 10,000.’”

Mr. Ornato said that Ms. Bowser replied she was all set and already had about 350 guardsmen for intersection control, which is not a law enforcement capacity.

Ms. Bowser ultimately rejected Mr. Trump’s offer for 10,000 National Guard troops and asked for only several hundred to serve in a limited role.

 

[Luckyone]

Try reading in its entirety, then you get the entire context, and not just the parts for your mantra.

Jan. 6 committee kept a lid on testimony Trump pushed for extra troops at Capitol

The Democrat-run House Jan. 6 committee suppressed testimony about President Trump pushing for National Guard troops to protect the U.S. Capitol on the day of the riot.

www.washingtontimes.com

According to the transcript, a Jan. 6 committee staffer asked Mr. Ornato, “When it comes to the National Guard statement about having 10,000 troops or any other number of troops, do you recall any discussion prior to the 6th about whether and how many National Guard troops to deploy on Jan. 6?”
Mr. Ornato said he remembered a conversation between White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser.

“He was on the phone with her and wanted to make sure she had everything that she needed,” he said. “I remember the number 10,000 coming up, you know, ‘The president wants to make sure that you have enough.’ You know, ‘He is willing to ask for 10,000.’”

Mr. Ornato said that Ms. Bowser replied she was all set and already had about 350 guardsmen for intersection control, which is not a law enforcement capacity.

Ms. Bowser ultimately rejected Mr. Trump’s offer for 10,000 National Guard troops and asked for only several hundred to serve in a limited role.

Botto line is that Trump did nothing when it was actually needed

 

[Missourian]

With that kind of a statement, you better prove it or you will leave yourself open to a defamation lawsuit.

Sorry, my dude, but you have to prove real harm. Since nobody knows who you are and worse, nobody gives a single fuck, you can feel free to pound sand down a rathole with stupid ass threats like this.