Trump Is Going To Lose Most Of The Current Federal Court Cases....Then What?

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Another ^ absolutely moronic comment from you. Baseless and stupid.

Try again if you ever come up with anything even close to intelligent.

Not as baseless and stupid as an imbecile such as yourself questioning the 14th Amendment.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Below is the current situation regarding all of Trump's Federal court cases. Trump is getting his ass handed to him right now by the Federal judges. --

Everything Trump is doing is blatantly unconstitutional. A 10 year old civics student can tell you that. Most of these court cases will just be laughed out of court.

What is Trump going to do when he ultimately loses most of these cases? Is he just going to ignore the rulings and become King Trump? That's my guess.

And his pathetic lackey JD Vance is already encouraging Trump to do just that.

View attachment 1077707

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/02/07/trump-lawsuits-executive-orders-actions-legal-challenges/

Bum bum bum bum bum buuuuuuum!


To the supreme court!

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Yes. I am. And, of course, I’m right. You can’t argue on the merits — ever.

You're a Nazi...there is no point.

It's like having a governmental ethics discussion with Hitler. It doesn't matter who is "correct"...you simply aren't a moral person.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You aren't qualified to make that determination -- you are a dirt stupid MAGA lump of shit.

It's laughable -- you expect me to have a "normal" constitutional law discussion with a Nazi such as yourself.

Humorous...and pathetic.

Back(onceyetreurned)Again, welcome! Been a while. Dr. Phosphorous simply owns you.

 

[Mac-7]

hhh

Think all you want, which is not going to change anchor babies being citizens.

At least not tomorrow

But the fight continues

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Bum bum bum bum bum buuuuuuum!


To the supreme court!

The Supreme Court probably won't even bother to hear most of these cases...since Trump's "position" is not actually based on any laws.

 

[BackAgain]

Not as baseless and stupid as an imbecile such as yourself questioning the 14th Amendment.

lol

Look at you. What a fuckin’ imbecile cockbite.

Yes. It is actually ok to question whether a given Amendment has been subjected to a long standing misinterpretation.

I notice you cannot address the issue on the merits. And you run away from all efforts to do so.

Mock ya later, you appallingly ignorant and pathetic ineffectual troll.

 

[BackAgain]

The Supreme Court probably won't even bother to hear most of these cases...since Trump's "position" is not actually based on any laws.

Another completely baseless ^ claim from the retard, nurse methane, sans any hint of support.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

SCOTUS will not support Trump ignoring law.

 

[BackAgain]

You're a Nazi...there is no point.

Nope. I’m confidant that you are, though.

You are, however, quite pointless.

Continue to embrace the ultimate fail you are, Nurse.

Mock ya later.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Nope. I’m confidant that you are, though.

You are, however, quite pointless.

Continue to embrace the ultimate fail you are, Nurse.

Mock ya later.

You want fascism. You want King Trump.

Having legal discussions with you is pointless....because you are an immoral person. You get a ******* hard-on every time Trump does something cruel to someone.

 

[BackAgain]

You want fascism. You want King Trump.

You already shared those baseless lies. Repeating them doesn’t make them any less dishonest, nurse.

 

[Hollie]

The Supreme Court probably won't even bother to hear most of these cases...since Trump's "position" is not actually based on any laws.

I wouldn’t be so sure about that Kleetus. There are a number of leftist clowns in the forum, intellectually addled as you are who make grandiose claims with no idea what they’re babbling about.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I wouldn’t be so sure about that Kleetus. There are a number of leftist clowns in the forum, intellectually addled as you are who make grandiose claims with no idea what they’re babbling about.

No, that's you in the mirror you are talking to.

 

[Hollie]

You want fascism. You want King Trump.

Having legal discussions with you is pointless....because you are an immoral person. You get a ******* hard-on every time Trump does something cruel to someone.

Your Trump hard-on fantasies belong in a different forum, Kleetus.

 

[San Souci]

Below is the current situation regarding all of Trump's Federal court cases. Trump is getting his ass handed to him right now by the Federal judges. --

Everything Trump is doing is blatantly unconstitutional. A 10 year old civics student can tell you that. Most of these court cases will just be laughed out of court.

What is Trump going to do when he ultimately loses most of these cases? Is he just going to ignore the rulings and become King Trump? That's my guess.

And his pathetic lackey JD Vance is already encouraging Trump to do just that.

View attachment 1077707

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/02/07/trump-lawsuits-executive-orders-actions-legal-challenges/

Full of Bullshit again ,I see. Ever heard of SCOTUS?

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

You already shared those baseless lies. Repeating them doesn’t make them any less dishonest, nurse.

Except they aren't lies. You want immoral, corrupt judges to help give Trump lame excuses to break the law.

You actually think that is "good" thing....Trump winning, no matter what. You are blinded by your hatred of liberals and you are willing to let Trump completely wreck this country in the name of "owning the libs".

 

[BackAgain]

Except they aren't lies.

Yeah. They are. It’s pretty much all you do.

You want immoral, corrupt judges to help give Trump lame excuses to break the law.

No. I don’t. I want judges to abide by the law and the Constitution. You don’t.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

SCOTUS will not support Trump ignoring law.

I 100% agree. During Trump's first term, the majority-Conservative SCOTUS actually ruled against Trump in multiple key rulings:

https://www.reuters.com/article/wor...ey-moments-in-blockbuster-term-idUSKBN24B17F/


John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, despite being very conservative in their personal political views, have shown that they won’t just go along with everything Trump wants. This coupled with the fact that Trump’s approach to everything in his second term thus far has been about being aggressive and showing force as opposed to offering thoughtful arguments in attempt to win over those who might not initially agree also hurt his chances with SCOTUS.

 

[Hollie]

I 100% agree. During Trump's first term, the majority-Conservative SCOTUS actually ruled against Trump in multiple key rulings:

https://www.reuters.com/article/wor...ey-moments-in-blockbuster-term-idUSKBN24B17F/


John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, despite being very conservative in their personal political views, have shown that they won’t just go along with everything Trump wants. This coupled with the fact that Trump’s approach to everything in his second term thus far has been about being aggressive and showing force as opposed to offering thoughtful arguments in attempt to win over those who might not initially agree also hurt his chances with SCOTUS.

Why yes Kleetus. Trump is aggressive as oppposed to slippery, wimpy Biden. Trump understands that leftists need a firm, guiding hand to help them understand.

And no, Kleetus, neither Roberts nor Coney Barrett care much about your hurt feelings.