Trump Is Going To Lose Most Of The Current Federal Court Cases....Then What?

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Why yes Kleetus. Trump is aggressive as oppposed to slippery, wimpy Biden. Trump understands that leftists need a firm, guiding hand to help them understand.

And no, Kleetus, neither Roberts nor Coney Barrett care much about your hurt feelings.

Ultimately, it doesn't matter. Trump is going to do whatever the fuck he wants, regardless of the court rulings.

And you fascists will be cheering him every step of the way.

 

[Rambunctious]

Nah. It was the whole corrupt organization. We saw the emails from the higher ups telling them to push the lies because the audience wanted them to.

ABC paid Trump inconvenience money and at worst Stephanopolous said he was a realist when he was actually a sexual assaulted. The horror.

Mostly networks are afraid of a wanna be fascist in the White House with a vendetta using the power of his office to attack private individuals.

The suit was against Hannity... but just wait to see what is coming Dominions way.... they are in huge trouble... and Musk has the evidence...

 

[ThisIsMe]

The Supreme Court probably won't even bother to hear most of these cases...since Trump's "position" is not actually based on any laws.

Wont know til we get there. Maybe...maybe not

 

[Marener]

The suit was against Hannity... but just wait to see what is coming Dominions way.... they are in huge trouble... and Musk has the evidence...

It was against Fox News. Not just Hannity.

Loading…

www.courthousenews.com

Putting your faith in Musk is just the saddest thing I’ve heard today. You really think he’s going to follow through on the shit he says? You clearly don’t know this guy.

 

[Rambunctious]

It was against Fox News. Not just Hannity.

Loading…

www.courthousenews.com

Putting your faith in Musk is just the saddest thing I’ve heard today. You really think he’s going to follow through on the shit he says? You clearly don’t know this guy.

Because it was aimed at Sean's show on FOX News... but Hannity was the target... FOX news had to pay just like with ABC for Stuffingenvelopes show.... Trump collected over 25 million for two lawsuits... just last month...

 

[kyzr]

Court just said Trump's Federal Employee buyout plan is LEGAL. One down 8 to go.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

It was against Fox News. Not just Hannity.

Loading…

www.courthousenews.com

Putting your faith in Musk is just the saddest thing I’ve heard today. You really think he’s going to follow through on the shit he says? You clearly don’t know this guy.

Not only that...why would these MAGA simpletons trust someone like Elon Musk who is wealthier than the bottom 30% of poorest Americans combined?? He is a sociopath just like Trump, he has fired thousands of people at Tesla and Twitter just for shits and giggles.

Stupid, misplaced trust....but that is the MAGA QAnon religion full of sucker imbeciles for you.

 

[Marener]

Because it was aimed at Sean's show on FOX News... but Hannity was the target... FOX news had to pay just like with ABC for Stuffingenvelopes show.... Trump collected over 25 million for two lawsuits... just last month...

It named half a dozen hosts, including Hannity.

News agencies wouldn’t have settled if he hadn’t become president. They fear Trump’s ability to use the government against them, like a true fascist would.

 

[Marener]

Court just said Trump's Federal Employee buyout plan is LEGAL. One down 8 to go.

Not exactly. They said the plaintiffs don’t have standing. Doesn’t seem like many people took him up on it anyway.

 

[imawhosure]

Below is the current situation regarding all of Trump's Federal court cases. Trump is getting his ass handed to him right now by the Federal judges. --

Everything Trump is doing is blatantly unconstitutional. A 10 year old civics student can tell you that. Most of these court cases will just be laughed out of court.

What is Trump going to do when he ultimately loses most of these cases? Is he just going to ignore the rulings and become King Trump? That's my guess.

And his pathetic lackey JD Vance is already encouraging Trump to do just that.

View attachment 1077707

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/02/07/trump-lawsuits-executive-orders-actions-legal-challenges/

What "cases"?

I don't expect the Judiciary, which is made up of lawyers that give up to 99.99999$ of all their money to the DNC, to side with Trump.

What I do expect, however, is for Trump to raise the awareness of the corruption within the system among the masses who all hate lawyers for good reason BTW, and take it from there.

Lawyers have destroyed the country. Trump is not one, luckily.

No, these activist liberal judges will be overruled. The president should just defy them.

Two are questionable

The Impoundment Clause involving withholding funds from Sanctuary cities may be insurmountable for the time being without new laws passed by congress

And birthright citizenship

OMG, this a**es sole intent is to get you to respond so as he can get paid by his LEFTIST masters. COME ON!

We should all have zero problem with arguing/debating a position, but when someone purposely pushes your buttons to get paid........well folks.......all I can ask is------------>was it worth it, knowing President Trump is in the catbird seat, LEFTISTS are on the run; to actually respond to this boob and doing so, get him paid?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

If this Leftist has a very good meal tonight, YOU PAID FOR IT, and he is laughing all the way to the dinner table!

 

[excalibur]

Woman breaks our laws, enters the nation illegally, pops out a baby, gets rewarded with permanent residence status, SNAP (food stamps), medical, housing, etc.

No, the Framers of the 14th did NOT have such citizenship in mind.

 

[kyzr]

Not exactly. They said the plaintiffs don’t have standing. Doesn’t seem like many people took him up on it anyway.

65,000 at last count, before they knew it was legal. I expect more to take the offer, we'll see.

 

[excalibur]

... Doesn’t seem like many people took him up on it anyway.

At least 20,000 and counting.

https://www.axios.com/2025/02/04/trump-buyout-federal-workers-20000

 

[Vrenn]

hhh

Think all you want, which is not going to change anchor babies being citizens.

It is now part of the constitution. So the change needs to adhere to the law to get the change. 2/3rds of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate must approve it and then it must be approve by 2/3rds of the states when Congress sends the States notice. The other way is the continental congress where it's done by the states and then presented to congress to make the amendment legal. The State method is very time consuming and probably not going to happen.

 

[Marener]

65,000 at last count, before they knew it was legal. I expect more to take the offer, we'll see.

In a workforce of millions, that barely registers. Most likely just people who were already planning on retiring or leaving.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Woman breaks our laws, enters the nation illegally, pops out a baby, gets rewarded with permanent residence status, SNAP (food stamps), medical, housing, etc.

No, the Framers of the 14th did NOT have such citizenship in mind.

You had massive immigration from Ireland and Germany in the 19th century. They faced a lot of discimination from the "native" Americans, it wasn't really much different than the MAGA racist whining about Hispanic immigration now.

There were no immigration laws for people to complain about in the 19th century....that is the biggest difference.

 

[Mac-7]

It is now part of the constitution.

Wrong

The anchor baby scam depends on a split decision in 1898

And different black robes can reverse that

 

[Vrenn]

Wrong

The anchor baby scam depends on a split decision in 1898

And different black robes can reverse that

It's the 14th amendment. Part of the Constitution. If you want to see a congress disassemble the SC, you method would certainly do it.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I guess you can't even read pictures.

But the fact that you don't know what I'm talking about shows how uninformed you are. Typical MAGA knuckle-dragger.

Gavels Garroted

MAGA knuckles will turn into fists and knock out Judicial Review. If we can't do it in the first round, we'll bring in Trump's heavyweight, Mike Tyson.

 

[Vrenn]

Wrong

The anchor baby scam depends on a split decision in 1898

And different black robes can reverse that

It's time for your daily history lesson, I see.

The ruling wasn't in opposition to the 14th, it was against the Chinese Exclusion Act.

Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco in 1873, had been denied re-entry to the United States after a trip abroad, under the Chinese Exclusion Act, a law banning virtually all Chinese immigration and prohibiting Chinese immigrants from becoming naturalized U.S. citizens. He challenged the government's refusal to recognize his citizenship, and the Supreme Court ruled in his favor, holding that the Citizenship Clause should be interpreted "in light of the common law". The case highlighted disagreements over the precise meaning of one phrase in the Citizenship Clause—namely, the provision that a person born in the United States who is "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" acquires automatic citizenship

Chinese Exclusion Act​

Which I would say would be the equiv of the Jim Crowe Laws for blacks.