Trump Is Going To Lose Most Of The Current Federal Court Cases....Then What?

[Billiejeens]

No, it's not metaphorical. You people are evil.

<Blushing>

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

That’s absolutely NOT what it says.

You persist in misreading the Amendment. It’s a shit way to discuss the subject.

Here:



Now that you hopefully have a clear view of what the Amendment ACTUALLY says, maybe we can get down to why the Interpretation of the Amendment needs to be corrected.

In that regard, courts look to the roots of any such law or Amensmwnt. Therefore it matters what one of the Amendmwnt’s own sponsors said at the time:


What 'Subject to the Jurisdiction Thereof' Really Means - The Federalist Blog (my emphasis is supplied).

There a great deal of additional item of support for what was intended as opposed to how it has been interpreted to date.

See:


Id.

Note. It is a topic worthy of additional discussion and debate. And, yes, there are two or more sides. But given what was said during the initial debates, I am hopeful that SCOTUS will accept the case (sooner rather than later) so that we can get on about the business of (hopefully) correcting the long-standing misinterpretation.

In other words, Ted Cruz should not be a Senator from Texas. OOOOOPS!!

 

[Rambunctious]

Wasn’t Fox News the one that had to pay almost $1 billion because they were lying about Dominion?

One host... Trump has sued two networks and won... networks you listen to... and by the way evidence about Dominion is just beginning to break... they are in big trouble... another story being held from you on CNN and MSNBC....

 

[Billiejeens]

That’s absolutely NOT what it says.

You persist in misreading the Amendment. It’s a shit way to discuss the subject.

Here:



Now that you hopefully have a clear view of what the Amendment ACTUALLY says, maybe we can get down to why the Interpretation of the Amendment needs to be corrected.

In that regard, courts look to the roots of any such law or Amensmwnt. Therefore it matters what one of the Amendmwnt’s own sponsors said at the time:


What 'Subject to the Jurisdiction Thereof' Really Means - The Federalist Blog (my emphasis is supplied).

There a great deal of additional item of support for what was intended as opposed to how it has been interpreted to date.

See:


Id.

Note. It is a topic worthy of additional discussion and debate. And, yes, there are two or more sides. But given what was said during the initial debates, I am hopeful that SCOTUS will accept the case (sooner rather than later) so that we can get on about the business of (hopefully) correcting the long-standing misinterpretation.

There is absolutely no doubt regarding the intent of the amendment -

The fact that it has been misused to the extent that it has is criminal.

Does a Roberts court have the courage to properly interpret it?

(it will be interesting once the Epstein list comes out - after that the blackmailing of Roberts loses it's power)

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Its based on a bad ruling/opinion of the SC

You have a bad opinion. The ruling is good.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

One host... Trump has sued two networks and won... networks you listen to... and by the way evidence about Dominion is just beginning to break... they are in big trouble... another story being held from you on CNN and MSNBC....

Which of the networks are ruling as judges?

 

[BackAgain]

No, it's not metaphorical. You people are evil.

Nurse, you’re a massive quivering pussy.

It’s quite funny to see how alarmed you get when libturd governmental malfeasance is getting scrutinized.

 

[BackAgain]

The president says what the exec does… unless it’s illegal. Common sense man. Get some

I knew you were incapable of following along.

You don’t have the slightest bit of common sense or any sense of any kind.

I already noted that the President is limited in what he can do as President to the requirement that it be Constitutionally allowed. But within those parameters, how he proceeds is his call. Not any judges.

If you ever obtain any sense at all, send up a flare.

 

[BackAgain]

Nope. I was responding to Mac’s comment. I never claimed anybody needs to be an expert, you’re misreading again

No. I got it right. You’re not at all honest.

 

[BackAgain]

In other words, Ted Cruz should not be a Senator from Texas. OOOOOPS!!

Another ^ absolutely moronic comment from you. Baseless and stupid.

Try again if you ever come up with anything even close to intelligent.

 

[BackAgain]

You have a bad opinion. The ruling is good.

You’re wrong again, retarded horses.

 

[Marener]

One host... Trump has sued two networks and won... networks you listen to... and by the way evidence about Dominion is just beginning to break... they are in big trouble... another story being held from you on CNN and MSNBC....

Nah. It was the whole corrupt organization. We saw the emails from the higher ups telling them to push the lies because the audience wanted them to.

ABC paid Trump inconvenience money and at worst Stephanopolous said he was a realist when he was actually a sexual assaulted. The horror.

Mostly networks are afraid of a wanna be fascist in the White House with a vendetta using the power of his office to attack private individuals.

 

[Blisterfinger]

You seriously need to look in the mirror. Unbelievable how you have zero self awareness

So you attack me instead of backing up your argument, or giving up your argument. You lose, again.

 

[Blisterfinger]

The president says what the exec does… unless it’s illegal. Common sense man. Get some

I thought you said the president had absolute immunity.

 

[Mac-7]

I’m not. Yet I can have a discussion about it

Then lets do so

 

[Mac-7]

You have a bad opinion. The ruling is good.

I dont think so

A chinese babe flies to the US, has a child, and now she’s the mother of a citizen

Thats wrong

 

[Vrenn]

No, you're wrong again. The dems have been engaging in massive corruption. Payment must be exacted.

Yes, and the NYC Mayor got a ruling from the DOJ blocking his trial and investigation by you MAGAts.

NYC Mayor Eric Adams thanks Justice Department after prosecutors directed to drop case against him​

New York City Mayor Eric Adams thanked the Justice Department on Tuesday for directing prosecutors to drop the federal case against him, saying he never broke the law or traded power for personal benefit.

Adams praised the department’s decision for “ending a months-long saga that put me, my family and this city through an unnecessary ordeal. As I said from the outset, I never broke the law and I never would. I would never put any personal benefit above my solemn responsibility as your mayor.”

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

hhh

I dont think so

A chinese babe flies to the US, has a child, and now she’s the mother of a citizen

Thats wrong

Think all you want, which is not going to change anchor babies being citizens.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Nurse, you’re a massive quivering pussy.

It’s quite funny to see how alarmed you get when libturd governmental malfeasance is getting scrutinized.

You aren't qualified to make that determination -- you are a dirt stupid MAGA lump of shit.

It's laughable -- you expect me to have a "normal" constitutional law discussion with a Nazi such as yourself.

Humorous...and pathetic.

 

[BackAgain]

You aren't qualified to make that determination -

Yes. I am. And, of course, I’m right. You can’t argue on the merits — ever.