- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,162
- 1,130
Hey, he's an actual American Citizen and he loves America. Good enough for me.
GO TRUMP! GO TRUMP!
GO TRUMP! GO TRUMP!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
1) He has the emotional maturity of a 14 year old girl.
2) His impending court cases.
3) He knows nothing about public policy or business. There's plenty of evidence for that.
4) His vocabulary and speech sophistication is no better than a 6th grader's.
5) He has an unhealthy relationship with Putin.
6) He wins World's Ugliest National Leader
No. I'm the one that wrote it there.LOL ---- did you copy this off the bathroom wall at the local elementary school???
4 million names have been gathered in the last 3 days on a petition that will be delivered with this letter to the electoral college members. At this rate there should be more than 40 million signatures by that time.
Letter to
Electoral College Electors
Electoral College make Hillary Clinton president on December 19,
The Founders created the Electoral College to balance two important values: the will of the people, and the need for a President who is fit for office.
Denying Mr. Trump the Presidency accomplishes both goals while violating no Constitutional principle.
In Federalist No. 68, Hamilton explains that the "sense of the people", must be expressed in the outcome. But, "Men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice," should make the final decision.
Hamilton pointed out that, "Talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity, may alone suffice to elevate a man to the first honors in a single State; but it will require other talents, and a different kind of merit, to establish him in the esteem and confidence of the whole Union, or of so considerable a portion of it as would be necessary to make him a successful candidate for the distinguished office of President of the United States".
Casting your ballot for Hillary preserves majority rule - the "sense of the people" - and prevents the most unqualified candidate in history from taking office. Never in our Republic's 240 years has our President had no previous experience in an office of public trust, be it elected or appointed, civilian or military. Never has a President admitted to sexual assaults. Never has a President encouraged violence at campaign events.
There is no reason electors cannot vote with their conscience. They are not taking away the majority vote, and are not violating the Constitution.
Please protect our Constitution and our Republic by casting your ballot for Hillary Clinton.
In Federalist No. 68, Hamilton explains that the "sense of the people", must be expressed in the outcome. But, "Men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice," should make the final decision.4 million names have been gathered in the last 3 days on a petition that will be delivered with this letter to the electoral college members. At this rate there should be more than 40 million signatures by that time.
Letter to
Electoral College Electors
Electoral College make Hillary Clinton president on December 19,
The Founders created the Electoral College to balance two important values: the will of the people, and the need for a President who is fit for office.
Denying Mr. Trump the Presidency accomplishes both goals while violating no Constitutional principle.
In Federalist No. 68, Hamilton explains that the "sense of the people", must be expressed in the outcome. But, "Men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice," should make the final decision.
Hamilton pointed out that, "Talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity, may alone suffice to elevate a man to the first honors in a single State; but it will require other talents, and a different kind of merit, to establish him in the esteem and confidence of the whole Union, or of so considerable a portion of it as would be necessary to make him a successful candidate for the distinguished office of President of the United States".
Casting your ballot for Hillary preserves majority rule - the "sense of the people" - and prevents the most unqualified candidate in history from taking office. Never in our Republic's 240 years has our President had no previous experience in an office of public trust, be it elected or appointed, civilian or military. Never has a President admitted to sexual assaults. Never has a President encouraged violence at campaign events.
There is no reason electors cannot vote with their conscience. They are not taking away the majority vote, and are not violating the Constitution.
Please protect our Constitution and our Republic by casting your ballot for Hillary Clinton.
Sore losers, eh? Do you know the purpose of the electoral college?
You idiot. The way illegal immigration has been quantified hasn't changed from previous presidents. That makes your entire feeble argument useless. The statistics still speak for themselves when you compare them by adminstration.Oh, like the "fact" that there are twelve million illegals in the United States the same number there were "in fact" in 1998? Chuckle. Nearly 30 years of illegal immigration and we still have the same number of illegals in the country.If you actually bothered with researching facts, you would know these facts come from multiple sources. You don't of course. That's why you are dumb enough to vote republcan.Well republicans are stupid, emotional voters. They ignore basic facts. Here's three:I said he would win the whole thing the day after he announced. Why? Because when Trump mentioned Mexico is sending us rapists, and the ladies in the media all went into the usual hysterics, gasping in horror and shrieking and fanning themselves, TRUMP DID NOT APOLOGIZE. HE DOUBLED DOWN. I told my mom: he keeps that up he'll take the whole thing.
1) Obama has deported more immigrants than any other president
2) Net immigration from Mexico is at zero: more Mexicans are leaving the US than entering
3) Crime among illegal immigrants is statistically low. Why? Because obviously they are at greater risk of being deported
Oh yeah? And you know that because you read it in the Washington Post? Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!
Yeah, geez, I wish I were smart like you Democrats so I could know all these facts from multiple sources like you do.
Do you know how they "count" illegal crossings? They base it on the number they catch. So, if the border patrol catches fewer illegal entrants this months, that doesn't mean more got in. To our government, it means illegal immigration went DOWN--fewer got in. I admit: I am so dumb that just doesn't make any sense to me.
Did you know half or more of all illegal immigration isn't even Juan Valdez and the kiddies wading across the Rio Grande after dark? It's people who enter on tourist or business or work visas and then don't leave when the visa expires. But since Congress for decades has refused to implement a visa-tracking entry-exit system like almost every other country has, we have no idea, in fact, who leaves, who stays, and how many do which.
So we dumb Republicans don't buy your multiple sources for the pap the Washington Post spoon feeds you, because we aren't smart like you. To us, it looks like the Washington Post has its own agenda and will say whatever it thinks we will be stupid enough to buy so long as it keeps the American people confused, misinformed, and calling each other names while The Post, et al, elect a new people.
We're so fucking dumb, in fact, we think the Post, et al, are the enemy.
Nice try though.
1) He has the emotional maturity of a 14 year old girl.
2) His impending court cases.
3) He knows nothing about public policy or business. There's plenty of evidence for that.
4) His vocabulary and speech sophistication is no better than a 6th grader's.
5) He has an unhealthy relationship with Putin.
6) He wins World's Ugliest National Leader
That sounds really scary, maybe he'll also set up his own private server, get $millions from Saudi Arabia for his "charity" and sponsor jihadis so they can promote peace & democracy.....
I don't get this one though
5) He has an unhealthy relationship with Putin.
Wanting to talk to the leader of the other country with thousands of nukes is unhealthy? You think Russia is still the evil empire, the commies are going to take over the world and will destroy your freedumbs unless you spend some more $trillions to stop them?
1) He has the emotional maturity of a 14 year old girl.
2) His impending court cases.
3) He knows nothing about public policy or business. There's plenty of evidence for that.
4) His vocabulary and speech sophistication is no better than a 6th grader's.
5) He has an unhealthy relationship with Putin.
6) He wins World's Ugliest National Leader
Why are you so focused on Hillary's loss? I'm talking about our current president elect.1) He has the emotional maturity of a 14 year old girl.
2) His impending court cases.
3) He knows nothing about public policy or business. There's plenty of evidence for that.
4) His vocabulary and speech sophistication is no better than a 6th grader's.
5) He has an unhealthy relationship with Putin.
6) He wins World's Ugliest National Leader
You're just making shit up.You idiot. The way illegal immigration has been quantified hasn't changed from previous presidents. That makes your entire feeble argument useless. The statistics still speak for themselves when you compare them by adminstration.Oh, like the "fact" that there are twelve million illegals in the United States the same number there were "in fact" in 1998? Chuckle. Nearly 30 years of illegal immigration and we still have the same number of illegals in the country.If you actually bothered with researching facts, you would know these facts come from multiple sources. You don't of course. That's why you are dumb enough to vote republcan.Well republicans are stupid, emotional voters. They ignore basic facts. Here's three:
1) Obama has deported more immigrants than any other president
2) Net immigration from Mexico is at zero: more Mexicans are leaving the US than entering
3) Crime among illegal immigrants is statistically low. Why? Because obviously they are at greater risk of being deported
Oh yeah? And you know that because you read it in the Washington Post? Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!
Yeah, geez, I wish I were smart like you Democrats so I could know all these facts from multiple sources like you do.
Do you know how they "count" illegal crossings? They base it on the number they catch. So, if the border patrol catches fewer illegal entrants this months, that doesn't mean more got in. To our government, it means illegal immigration went DOWN--fewer got in. I admit: I am so dumb that just doesn't make any sense to me.
Did you know half or more of all illegal immigration isn't even Juan Valdez and the kiddies wading across the Rio Grande after dark? It's people who enter on tourist or business or work visas and then don't leave when the visa expires. But since Congress for decades has refused to implement a visa-tracking entry-exit system like almost every other country has, we have no idea, in fact, who leaves, who stays, and how many do which.
So we dumb Republicans don't buy your multiple sources for the pap the Washington Post spoon feeds you, because we aren't smart like you. To us, it looks like the Washington Post has its own agenda and will say whatever it thinks we will be stupid enough to buy so long as it keeps the American people confused, misinformed, and calling each other names while The Post, et al, elect a new people.
We're so fucking dumb, in fact, we think the Post, et al, are the enemy.
Nice try though.
Actually, that's not true ....
Prior to the Obama administration, illegals who were blocked from entering at the various entry points were called "turnbacks" (they were turned back) ..
Beginning in 2010, these were classified as "deportations" under the obviously questionable logic that, since they had entered the processing area, they were on American soil and were "deported" back to their country of origin. This mathematical manipulation is what allowed the Obama administration to claim "increased deportations".
Figures don't lie .... but liars figure.
Why are you so focused on Hillary's loss? I'm talking about our current president elect.1) He has the emotional maturity of a 14 year old girl.
2) His impending court cases.
3) He knows nothing about public policy or business. There's plenty of evidence for that.
4) His vocabulary and speech sophistication is no better than a 6th grader's.
5) He has an unhealthy relationship with Putin.
6) He wins World's Ugliest National Leader
Funny you insult 60,000,000 people shows your lack of maturity! Hey brat!Nope wasn't me, but I don't think anyone could have predicted Americans really are this retarded.Aren't you the guy who guaranteed he'd never win a single primary?1) The has the emotional maturity of a 14 year old girl.
2) His impending court cases.
3) He knows nothing about public policy or business. There's plenty of evidence for that.
4) His vocabulary and speech sophisticatioo is no better than a 6th grader's.
5) He has an unhealthy relationship with Putin.
6) He wins World's Ugliest National Leader
You areYou're just making shit up.You idiot. The way illegal immigration has been quantified hasn't changed from previous presidents. That makes your entire feeble argument useless. The statistics still speak for themselves when you compare them by adminstration.Oh, like the "fact" that there are twelve million illegals in the United States the same number there were "in fact" in 1998? Chuckle. Nearly 30 years of illegal immigration and we still have the same number of illegals in the country.If you actually bothered with researching facts, you would know these facts come from multiple sources. You don't of course. That's why you are dumb enough to vote republcan.Oh yeah? And you know that because you read it in the Washington Post? Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!
Yeah, geez, I wish I were smart like you Democrats so I could know all these facts from multiple sources like you do.
Do you know how they "count" illegal crossings? They base it on the number they catch. So, if the border patrol catches fewer illegal entrants this months, that doesn't mean more got in. To our government, it means illegal immigration went DOWN--fewer got in. I admit: I am so dumb that just doesn't make any sense to me.
Did you know half or more of all illegal immigration isn't even Juan Valdez and the kiddies wading across the Rio Grande after dark? It's people who enter on tourist or business or work visas and then don't leave when the visa expires. But since Congress for decades has refused to implement a visa-tracking entry-exit system like almost every other country has, we have no idea, in fact, who leaves, who stays, and how many do which.
So we dumb Republicans don't buy your multiple sources for the pap the Washington Post spoon feeds you, because we aren't smart like you. To us, it looks like the Washington Post has its own agenda and will say whatever it thinks we will be stupid enough to buy so long as it keeps the American people confused, misinformed, and calling each other names while The Post, et al, elect a new people.
We're so fucking dumb, in fact, we think the Post, et al, are the enemy.
Nice try though.
Actually, that's not true ....
Prior to the Obama administration, illegals who were blocked from entering at the various entry points were called "turnbacks" (they were turned back) ..
Beginning in 2010, these were classified as "deportations" under the obviously questionable logic that, since they had entered the processing area, they were on American soil and were "deported" back to their country of origin. This mathematical manipulation is what allowed the Obama administration to claim "increased deportations".
Figures don't lie .... but liars figure.
Billy, that's a really well articulated opinion. Given your beliefs, how do you explain that he is the President Elect?1) He has the emotional maturity of a 14 year old girl.
2) His impending court cases.
3) He knows nothing about public policy or business. There's plenty of evidence for that.
4) His vocabulary and speech sophistication is no better than a 6th grader's.
5) He has an unhealthy relationship with Putin.
6) He wins World's Ugliest National Leader
Go smoke another fattie, Tyrone! Clinton lost because she was a corrupt Washington insider who offered nothing different from Obama's eight years of incompetence. The "system" is how we have elected Presidents for hundreds of years. You just don't like it because it didn't work for your gal Hillary!
She lost as far as the EV system ...the majority of the population did not agree.............. that is a fact
1) He has the emotional maturity of a 14 year old girl.
2) His impending court cases.
3) He knows nothing about public policy or business. There's plenty of evidence for that.
4) His vocabulary and speech sophistication is no better than a 6th grader's.
5) He has an unhealthy relationship with Putin.
6) He wins World's Ugliest National Leader