Trump has no concept on how the burden of proof works

[colfax_m]

I never wanted them recounted. I thought was was pointless. I don't know why they did.

Hmmm

I personally would like recounts and what not... Because I do actually feel for the first time ever on an election, disenfranchised.

 

[colfax_m]

So, yet a other leftist who claims there is "no evidence", when there is a mountain of evidence. It is put on front page here all the time. Instead of even reading the threads you come to those threads as well and claim "there is no evidence", right after evidence is presented. No wonder you have trouble finding evidence.

We’ve seen your evidence. It’s garbage.

 

[Norman]

So, yet a other leftist who claims there is "no evidence", when there is a mountain of evidence. It is put on front page here all the time. Instead of even reading the threads you come to those threads as well and claim "there is no evidence", right after evidence is presented. No wonder you have trouble finding evidence.

We’ve seen your evidence. It’s garbage.

That we have no evidence of.

 

[colfax_m]

So, yet a other leftist who claims there is "no evidence", when there is a mountain of evidence. It is put on front page here all the time. Instead of even reading the threads you come to those threads as well and claim "there is no evidence", right after evidence is presented. No wonder you have trouble finding evidence.

We’ve seen your evidence. It’s garbage.

That we have no evidence of.

You call it evidence. I call it half baked theories of unsupported conclusions and leaps of logic.

The courts have agreed with me.

 

[Norman]

So, yet a other leftist who claims there is "no evidence", when there is a mountain of evidence. It is put on front page here all the time. Instead of even reading the threads you come to those threads as well and claim "there is no evidence", right after evidence is presented. No wonder you have trouble finding evidence.

We’ve seen your evidence. It’s garbage.

That we have no evidence of.

You call it evidence. I call it half baked theories of unsupported conclusions and leaps of logic.

The courts have agreed with me.

No one gives a toss, clearly you have no idea what the word "evidence" even means.

So far in the actual threads, you have refuted precisely zero of the evidence presented.

 

[colfax_m]

So, yet a other leftist who claims there is "no evidence", when there is a mountain of evidence. It is put on front page here all the time. Instead of even reading the threads you come to those threads as well and claim "there is no evidence", right after evidence is presented. No wonder you have trouble finding evidence.

We’ve seen your evidence. It’s garbage.

That we have no evidence of.

You call it evidence. I call it half baked theories of unsupported conclusions and leaps of logic.

The courts have agreed with me.

No one gives a toss, clearly you have no idea what the word "evidence" even means.

So far in the actual threads, you have refuted precisely zero of the evidence presented.

I spent a lot of time debunking the accusations of Shiva Ayyadurai when that was en Vogue.

The rest of the “evidence” follows suit.

 

[Toro]

Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.

Trump shrugs off Pennsylvania lawsuit defeat by falsely claiming he won state ‘by a lot’

‘The Pennsylvania votes were RIGGED’, claims president

www.yahoo.com

As courts deny Trump election challenges, president says Biden must prove votes were cast legally

Meanwhile on Friday, a Trump-appointed judge slammed the president's election case in a federal court in Pennsylvania.

www.thedenverchannel.com

Orange Jesus seems not to understand we live under the rule of law and he is not a God-King, no matter how much his adoring cult would like that to be.

 

[dudmuck]

So, yet a other leftist who claims there is "no evidence", when there is a mountain of evidence. It is put on front page here all the time. Instead of even reading the threads you come to those threads as well and claim "there is no evidence", right after evidence is presented. No wonder you have trouble finding evidence.

We’ve seen your evidence. It’s garbage.

That we have no evidence of.

You call it evidence. I call it half baked theories of unsupported conclusions and leaps of logic.

The courts have agreed with me.

No one gives a toss, clearly you have no idea what the word "evidence" even means.

So far in the actual threads, you have refuted precisely zero of the evidence presented.

 

[Toro]

So, yet a other leftist who claims there is "no evidence", when there is a mountain of evidence. It is put on front page here all the time. Instead of even reading the threads you come to those threads as well and claim "there is no evidence", right after evidence is presented. No wonder you have trouble finding evidence.

We’ve seen your evidence. It’s garbage.

That we have no evidence of.

You call it evidence. I call it half baked theories of unsupported conclusions and leaps of logic.

The courts have agreed with me.

No one gives a toss, clearly you have no idea what the word "evidence" even means.

So far in the actual threads, you have refuted precisely zero of the evidence presented.

The courts know what evidence means.

That’s why Trump’s lawsuits get dismissed “with prejudice”.

 

[rightwinger]

You have no concept that any president can, per the Constitution, challenge the results of an election, whether you like it or not.

Very true

And he needs actual proof to support that challenge.
Sucks being Trump

 

[harmonica]

Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.

Trump shrugs off Pennsylvania lawsuit defeat by falsely claiming he won state ‘by a lot’

‘The Pennsylvania votes were RIGGED’, claims president

www.yahoo.com

As courts deny Trump election challenges, president says Biden must prove votes were cast legally

Meanwhile on Friday, a Trump-appointed judge slammed the president's election case in a federal court in Pennsylvania.

www.thedenverchannel.com

more racism from you--hating the WHITE guy

 

[MaryAnne11]

So, yet a other leftist who claims there is "no evidence", when there is a mountain of evidence. It is put on front page here all the time. Instead of even reading the threads you come to those threads as well and claim "there is no evidence", right after evidence is presented. No wonder you have trouble finding evidence.

Funny, 39 Judges said no case!

 

[Norman]

So, yet a other leftist who claims there is "no evidence", when there is a mountain of evidence. It is put on front page here all the time. Instead of even reading the threads you come to those threads as well and claim "there is no evidence", right after evidence is presented. No wonder you have trouble finding evidence.

Funny, 39 Judges said no case!

Legally, overwhelmingly the evidence has not even been reviewed yet, so you are absolutely wrong.

 

[MaryAnne11]

So, yet a other leftist who claims there is "no evidence", when there is a mountain of evidence. It is put on front page here all the time. Instead of even reading the threads you come to those threads as well and claim "there is no evidence", right after evidence is presented. No wonder you have trouble finding evidence.

Funny, 39 Judges said no case!

Legally, overwhelmingly the evidence has not even been reviewed yet, so you are absolutely wrong.

Go ask the 39 Judges. The election is over.

 

[Shelzin]

So who would? Why should anyone trust this person would be unbiased?

Why would anyone trust the people who did it the first time would be unbiased?

Thank you. *shrugs*

 

[Shelzin]

We already have echeck. Have had for some time. Do you guys have any conception of what poll workers and BOE’s do?

Maybe a day of service at the polls might help.

Do you have any concept that those procedures weren't followed? That I can't look ***MYSELF*** to see who I voted for to make sure it was tallied correctly? Watch the video.

 

[Shelzin]

But now Trump and his base want to see all eighty million people so they can believe that it truly happened and if Biden and his base do not produce those people, well then Trump and his base will declare it was all a lie and Trump is the winner of that chicken dinner...

Nothing will be acceptable for why Trump did not beat Biden and even God could come down and state Biden won and Trump would proclaim that is not God and Trump is God and his base would believe Trump...

Eight years ago.

Voting Rights vs. Election Fraud Prevention

What's more important to you as a US Citizen: Ensuring that ALL US citizens are able to freely exercise their RIGHT to vote, even if it means that some election fraud may occur, or Preventing election fraud by non-citizens, even if it means that some US citizens will be unable to...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[LeftofLeft]

Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.

Trump shrugs off Pennsylvania lawsuit defeat by falsely claiming he won state ‘by a lot’

‘The Pennsylvania votes were RIGGED’, claims president

www.yahoo.com

As courts deny Trump election challenges, president says Biden must prove votes were cast legally

Meanwhile on Friday, a Trump-appointed judge slammed the president's election case in a federal court in Pennsylvania.

www.thedenverchannel.com

Maybe he sees how the Left is willing to ignore the burden of proof for Christine Baisley Ford in her allegations of Kavanaugh.

 

[Shelzin]

I never wanted them recounted. I thought was was pointless. I don't know why they did.

Hmmm

I personally would like recounts and what not... Because I do actually feel for the first time ever on an election, disenfranchised.

Yeah? Information changed between posts. But note there "and what not" meaning more than just recounts.

 

[Christ_on_a_croissant]

The Supreme Court will decide what is factual and what isn't in this case.

The USSC won’t touch this.