Trump has no concept on how the burden of proof works

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
24,722
Reaction score
5,771
Points
290
Location
Colorado
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


 
OP
Billy000

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
24,722
Reaction score
5,771
Points
290
Location
Colorado
You have no concept that any president can, per the Constitution, challenge the results of an election, whether you like it or not.
Yes, but Trump knows he lost. He’s just trying to cheat the system. It’s as simple as that. He’s a whiny little bitch who can’t handle losing as with his supporters. This is the same moron who in 2016 claimed the election would be rigged if Hillary were to end up winning. This moron will say this shit regardless of the circumstances.
 

LuckyDuck

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
5,096
Reaction score
2,419
Points
290
You have no concept that any president can, per the Constitution, challenge the results of an election, whether you like it or not.
Yes, but Trump knows he lost. He’s just trying to cheat the system. It’s as simple as that. He’s a whiny little bitch who can’t handle losing as with his supporters. This is the same moron who in 2016 claimed the election would be rigged if Hillary were to end up winning. This moron will say this shit regardless of the circumstances.
The Supreme Court will decide what is factual and what isn't in this case.
 

Sun Devil 92

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
32,084
Reaction score
11,049
Points
1,410
You have no concept that any president can, per the Constitution, challenge the results of an election, whether you like it or not.
Yes, but Trump knows he lost. He’s just trying to cheat the system. It’s as simple as that. He’s a whiny little bitch who can’t handle losing as with his supporters. This is the same moron who in 2016 claimed the election would be rigged if Hillary were to end up winning. This moron will say this shit regardless of the circumstances.
It's so funny to read your bullshit threads.

I've said many times, they need their own forum where we can all go for a good laugh.

He's trying to cheat the system ? Really ? How ?

He's a whiny little bitch.......no...that would be you for the last four years. Fuck knows how many Republican/Trump threads you've started, got shoved up your ass, only to have you come back repeating the same garbage weeks later.

You are probably one of the best cases for not letting some people breed. Motherfucker....I can't imagine what your offspring would be like.
 
OP
Billy000

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
24,722
Reaction score
5,771
Points
290
Location
Colorado
You have no concept that any president can, per the Constitution, challenge the results of an election, whether you like it or not.
Yes, but Trump knows he lost. He’s just trying to cheat the system. It’s as simple as that. He’s a whiny little bitch who can’t handle losing as with his supporters. This is the same moron who in 2016 claimed the election would be rigged if Hillary were to end up winning. This moron will say this shit regardless of the circumstances.
The Supreme Court will decide what is factual and what isn't in this case.
You’d think if this narrative had any basis to it, Trump would have some success in delaying the certification process. Biden hasn’t really had to do anything to counter it. God knows he has the legal resources at his disposal if it came to that.
 

BertramN

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2016
Messages
2,330
Reaction score
1,720
Points
1,970
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


Keep in mind, his lead attorney is Oozy Giuliani, and his elderly mind has slipped away equally to that of the RWNJs' cheeto-in-chief.


.
 

Rogue AI

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
850
Reaction score
1,040
Points
873
Location
Wisconsin
Every one seems to be ignoring the other side of this. If there is fraud that's also a criminal matter. Whatever evidence that a criminal investigation has wouldn't be public until the hammer drops. I guess we'll see.
 

Shelzin

Equal Opportunity Asshole
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
5,584
Reaction score
2,591
Points
198
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


Well... It's more like let us actually check the votes for validity... Which... the Democrats are obviously against. That's how you prove it was a good election.

The DNC doesn't want to prove it was a good election. Which makes sense if your only goal is to win.
 
OP
Billy000

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
24,722
Reaction score
5,771
Points
290
Location
Colorado
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


Well... It's more like let us actually check the votes for validity... Which... the Democrats are obviously against. That's how you prove it was a good election.

The DNC doesn't want to prove it was a good election. Which makes sense if your only goal is to win.
What in the fuck makes you qualified for that? Why should anyone trust your judgement?
 

idb

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
14,164
Reaction score
1,978
Points
265
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


Well... It's more like let us actually check the votes for validity... Which... the Democrats are obviously against. That's how you prove it was a good election.

The DNC doesn't want to prove it was a good election. Which makes sense if your only goal is to win.
"Checking" the votes isn't turning out so well for the plaintiffs.

 

Shelzin

Equal Opportunity Asshole
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
5,584
Reaction score
2,591
Points
198
What in the fuck makes you qualified for that? Why should anyone trust your judgement?
o.0

I wouldn't be the one checking the validity of the votes.
 

Shelzin

Equal Opportunity Asshole
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
5,584
Reaction score
2,591
Points
198
"Checking" the votes isn't turning out so well for the plaintiffs.

They didn't check them for validity... They recounted them. Big difference.

Edit: Edit... Listen guys... I think Biden is going to win this. I see what Trumps trying to do, and.. It's possible. but... Meh...

But that doesn't mean this should EVER happen again. There are better ways to do this. The one I champion:


How about it? We actually get a way to verify our votes? And... we only print enough for the registered voters? How about it?
 

Andylusion

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
20,481
Reaction score
5,781
Points
290
Location
Central Ohio
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


Screenshot_2020-11-29 Meme Generator - Imgflip.png


How is Jussie Smollett's credibility doing these days? :) About as well as your own credibility I suppose?
 

idb

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
14,164
Reaction score
1,978
Points
265
"Checking" the votes isn't turning out so well for the plaintiffs.

They didn't check them for validity... They recounted them. Big difference.
The Trump team requested a recount.
They didn't get the result they/you wanted so you move the goalposts...to be expected really.

A recount in Wisconsin’s largest county demanded by Republican President Donald Trump’s election campaign ended Friday with Democratic President-elect Joe Biden gaining votes.
After the recount in Milwaukee County, Biden had a net gain of 132 votes, out of nearly 460,000 cast. Overall, Biden gained 257 votes to Trump’s 125.
Trump’s campaign had demanded recounts in two of Wisconsin’s most populous and Democratic-leaning counties, after losing Wisconsin to Biden by over 20,000 votes. The two recounts will cost the Trump campaign $3 million. Dane County is expected to finish its recount on Sunday.
 

Shelzin

Equal Opportunity Asshole
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
5,584
Reaction score
2,591
Points
198
The Trump team requested a recount.
They didn't get the result they/you wanted so you move the goalposts...to be expected really.
I never wanted them recounted. I thought was was pointless. I don't know why they did.

My goal posts didn't move at all.
 
OP
Billy000

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
24,722
Reaction score
5,771
Points
290
Location
Colorado
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


View attachment 422919

How is Jussie Smollett's credibility doing these days? :) About as well as your own credibility I suppose?
Lol it’s just incredible how you people still talk about Smollett. I mean seriously. What the fuck? I guess you need him as a whataboutism for the fact that Rightwing violence is an actual statistical problem. You bring up Smollett and say “see?! There is no rightwing terrorism! It’s all a lie!”
 

Andylusion

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
20,481
Reaction score
5,781
Points
290
Location
Central Ohio
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


View attachment 422919

How is Jussie Smollett's credibility doing these days? :) About as well as your own credibility I suppose?
Lol it’s just incredible how you people still talk about Smollett. I mean seriously. What the fuck? I guess you need him as a whataboutism for the fact that Rightwing violence is an actual statistical problem. You bring up Smollett and say “see?! There is no rightwing terrorism! It’s all a lie!”
Because you people supported claims without even the smallest bit of proof. Apparently you don't care about burden of proof, unless it applies to yourselves, then it matters. But anyone else, you can screw over without any evidence whatsoever.

This is the same as the "systemic racism" claim, that you can not provide the smallest bit of proof. The Bret Kavanough accusations you couldn't provide even the most tiny evidence of. The Russia Trump you couldn't provide any proof of.

Suddenly, when someone who isn't a disgusting left-wing snot rag like yourselves makes a claim.... then magically "BURDEN OF PROOF!"

Screenshot_2020-11-29 Meme Generator - Imgflip.png
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top