Trump has no concept on how the burden of proof works

OP
Billy000

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
24,728
Reaction score
5,770
Points
290
Location
Colorado
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


View attachment 422919

How is Jussie Smollett's credibility doing these days? :) About as well as your own credibility I suppose?
Lol it’s just incredible how you people still talk about Smollett. I mean seriously. What the fuck? I guess you need him as a whataboutism for the fact that Rightwing violence is an actual statistical problem. You bring up Smollett and say “see?! There is no rightwing terrorism! It’s all a lie!”
Because you people supported claims without even the smallest bit of proof. Apparently you don't care about burden of proof, unless it applies to yourselves, then it matters. But anyone else, you can screw over without any evidence whatsoever.

This is the same as the "systemic racism" claim, that you can not provide the smallest bit of proof. The Bret Kavanough accusations you couldn't provide even the most tiny evidence of. The Russia Trump you couldn't provide any proof of.

Suddenly, when someone who isn't a disgusting left-wing snot rag like yourselves makes a claim.... then magically "BURDEN OF PROOF!"

View attachment 422921
I never claimed Kavanaugh was guilty. It was always his word against hers. Of course, either way, his hearing showed how unfit he was for the role. He acted like a little juvenile bitch lol
 
Last edited:

Sun Devil 92

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
32,084
Reaction score
11,049
Points
1,410
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


View attachment 422919

How is Jussie Smollett's credibility doing these days? :) About as well as your own credibility I suppose?
Lol it’s just incredible how you people still talk about Smollett. I mean seriously. What the fuck? I guess you need him as a whataboutism for the fact that Rightwing violence is an actual statistical problem. You bring up Smollett and say “see?! There is no rightwing terrorism! It’s all a lie!”
Because you people supported claims without even the smallest bit of proof. Apparently you don't care about burden of proof, unless it applies to yourselves, then it matters. But anyone else, you can screw over without any evidence whatsoever.

This is the same as the "systemic racism" claim, that you can not provide the smallest bit of proof. The Bret Kavanough accusations you couldn't provide even the most tiny evidence of. The Russia Trump you couldn't provide any proof of.

Suddenly, when someone who isn't a disgusting left-wing snot rag like yourselves makes a claim.... then magically "BURDEN OF PROOF!"

View attachment 422921
I never claimed Kavanaugh was guilty. It was always his word against his. Of course, either way, his hearing showed how unfit he was for the role. He acted like a little juvenile bitch lol
You are such a stupid fuck.

You pick justices who will fulfill the role or justice.

Period.

Glad to explain that little tidbit of high school civics to a total moron like yourself.
 

Andylusion

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
20,473
Reaction score
5,774
Points
290
Location
Central Ohio
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


View attachment 422919

How is Jussie Smollett's credibility doing these days? :) About as well as your own credibility I suppose?
Lol it’s just incredible how you people still talk about Smollett. I mean seriously. What the fuck? I guess you need him as a whataboutism for the fact that Rightwing violence is an actual statistical problem. You bring up Smollett and say “see?! There is no rightwing terrorism! It’s all a lie!”
Because you people supported claims without even the smallest bit of proof. Apparently you don't care about burden of proof, unless it applies to yourselves, then it matters. But anyone else, you can screw over without any evidence whatsoever.

This is the same as the "systemic racism" claim, that you can not provide the smallest bit of proof. The Bret Kavanough accusations you couldn't provide even the most tiny evidence of. The Russia Trump you couldn't provide any proof of.

Suddenly, when someone who isn't a disgusting left-wing snot rag like yourselves makes a claim.... then magically "BURDEN OF PROOF!"

View attachment 422921
I never claimed Kavanaugh was guilty. It was always his word against his. Of course, either way, his hearing showed how unfit he was for the role. He acted like a little juvenile bitch lol
Not really. Pretty much anyone treated like crap long enough will tell the lying snot people, to go jump off a cliff, and he was right, and your side was crap.

But since you bought yourself into this conversations, let's look at your own statements.

You are so dumb. You assume someone not verifying the story means the assault didn't happen yet no one came forward to support Kavanaugh's claim it didn't happen so therefore Ford lied regardless.... based on what? How about you just quit now? This is getting embarrassing.
I find this hilarious you think this is somehow evidence she lied even though Kavanaugh never took the test! Doesn’t that seem odd to you? She took the polygraph but he didn’t because he was a pussy liar.
Do these two quotes from you, show that you believe in "burden of proof" in that context?

Why does Kavanough have to prove he's not lying? Isn't the burden of proof on the person making the claim?
Why does Kavanough have to take a lie detector test? Isn't the burden of proof on the person claiming he engaged in misconduct?

Why is it that when someone on your side makes a claim, it's on Kavanough to prove them wrong, not on Ford's side to provide proof she is right?

Why is it that the burden of proof is only required for other people, not your people?

Screenshot_2020-11-29 Meme Generator - Imgflip.png


Your own words condemn you. :)
 
OP
Billy000

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
24,728
Reaction score
5,770
Points
290
Location
Colorado
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


View attachment 422919

How is Jussie Smollett's credibility doing these days? :) About as well as your own credibility I suppose?
Lol it’s just incredible how you people still talk about Smollett. I mean seriously. What the fuck? I guess you need him as a whataboutism for the fact that Rightwing violence is an actual statistical problem. You bring up Smollett and say “see?! There is no rightwing terrorism! It’s all a lie!”
Because you people supported claims without even the smallest bit of proof. Apparently you don't care about burden of proof, unless it applies to yourselves, then it matters. But anyone else, you can screw over without any evidence whatsoever.

This is the same as the "systemic racism" claim, that you can not provide the smallest bit of proof. The Bret Kavanough accusations you couldn't provide even the most tiny evidence of. The Russia Trump you couldn't provide any proof of.

Suddenly, when someone who isn't a disgusting left-wing snot rag like yourselves makes a claim.... then magically "BURDEN OF PROOF!"

View attachment 422921
I never claimed Kavanaugh was guilty. It was always his word against his. Of course, either way, his hearing showed how unfit he was for the role. He acted like a little juvenile bitch lol
Not really. Pretty much anyone treated like crap long enough will tell the lying snot people, to go jump off a cliff, and he was right, and your side was crap.

But since you bought yourself into this conversations, let's look at your own statements.

You are so dumb. You assume someone not verifying the story means the assault didn't happen yet no one came forward to support Kavanaugh's claim it didn't happen so therefore Ford lied regardless.... based on what? How about you just quit now? This is getting embarrassing.
I find this hilarious you think this is somehow evidence she lied even though Kavanaugh never took the test! Doesn’t that seem odd to you? She took the polygraph but he didn’t because he was a pussy liar.
Do these two quotes from you, show that you believe in "burden of proof" in that context?

Why does Kavanough have to prove he's not lying? Isn't the burden of proof on the person making the claim?
Why does Kavanough have to take a lie detector test? Isn't the burden of proof on the person claiming he engaged in misconduct?

Why is it that when someone on your side makes a claim, it's on Kavanough to prove them wrong, not on Ford's side to provide proof she is right?

Why is it that the burden of proof is only required for other people, not your people?

View attachment 422922

Your own words condemn you. :)
Lol I can’t believe you went through all that trouble to dig those quotes up. They really don’t contradict what I said. In neither one did I say he was guilty. In both posts I was arguing that the poster’s idea of evidence that she was lying was bullshit. That doesn’t mean I was suggesting there was any evidence Kavanaugh was lying. In the second I just pointed to things I found suspicious. I can’t help but have an opinion on the matter. That doesn’t mean I pretend to KNOW if he was guilty. I don’t pretend there is evidence he was guilty.
 
Last edited:

Leo123

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2017
Messages
11,232
Reaction score
4,763
Points
400
Yes, but Trump knows he lost. He’s just trying to cheat the system. It’s as simple as that. He’s a whiny little bitch who can’t handle losing as with his supporters. This is the same moron who in 2016 claimed the election would be rigged if Hillary were to end up winning. This moron will say this shit regardless of the circumstances.
Meanwhile the little whiny-bitch Democrats did not accept Trump for four years. Payback will be a bitch for Biden.
 
OP
Billy000

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
24,728
Reaction score
5,770
Points
290
Location
Colorado
Yes, but Trump knows he lost. He’s just trying to cheat the system. It’s as simple as that. He’s a whiny little bitch who can’t handle losing as with his supporters. This is the same moron who in 2016 claimed the election would be rigged if Hillary were to end up winning. This moron will say this shit regardless of the circumstances.
Meanwhile the little whiny-bitch Democrats did not accept Trump for four years. Payback will be a bitch for Biden.
No one said his win was fraudulent. They sure as hell didn’t before the count was even over. That’s how fucking whiny republicans are.
 

westwall

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
68,871
Reaction score
22,807
Points
2,250
Location
Nevada
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.







Claims the idiot who can't provide a single empirical data set, nor comprehend what that even means, yet demand that we bow down to the cult of globull warming.
 

gipper

Libertarian/Anarchist
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
39,662
Reaction score
11,381
Points
1,330
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


View attachment 422919

How is Jussie Smollett's credibility doing these days? :) About as well as your own credibility I suppose?
Lol it’s just incredible how you people still talk about Smollett. I mean seriously. What the fuck? I guess you need him as a whataboutism for the fact that Rightwing violence is an actual statistical problem. You bring up Smollett and say “see?! There is no rightwing terrorism! It’s all a lie!”
Because you people supported claims without even the smallest bit of proof. Apparently you don't care about burden of proof, unless it applies to yourselves, then it matters. But anyone else, you can screw over without any evidence whatsoever.

This is the same as the "systemic racism" claim, that you can not provide the smallest bit of proof. The Bret Kavanough accusations you couldn't provide even the most tiny evidence of. The Russia Trump you couldn't provide any proof of.

Suddenly, when someone who isn't a disgusting left-wing snot rag like yourselves makes a claim.... then magically "BURDEN OF PROOF!"

View attachment 422921
You can add Russiagate. That was a big fat lie.
 

Leo123

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2017
Messages
11,232
Reaction score
4,763
Points
400
No one said his win was fraudulent. They sure as hell didn’t before the count was even over. That’s how fucking whiny republicans are.
What does it matter when the challenges are mounted? You sure have a short memory.....From the LATimes a Democrat propaganda 'news.'


"As more and more facts about Trump’s incongruous victory emerge, the doubts gnaw harder — and grow harder to ignore."

"A nation devoted to majority rule has a minority president. Who squeaked into office on an electoral college technicality. Against most data projections. Using dark money. Using voter suppression. Using Russian disinformation."

All bullshit of course but they wasted 4 years on their witch-hunt. Surely Biden deserves the same scrutiny....right?
 

MaryAnne11

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2016
Messages
1,872
Reaction score
658
Points
200
"Checking" the votes isn't turning out so well for the plaintiffs.

They didn't check them for validity... They recounted them. Big difference.

Edit: Edit... Listen guys... I think Biden is going to win this. I see what Trumps trying to do, and.. It's possible. but... Meh...

But that doesn't mean this should EVER happen again. There are better ways to do this. The one I champion:


How about it? We actually get a way to verify our votes? And... we only print enough for the registered voters? How about it?
We already have echeck. Have had for some time. Do you guys have any conception of what poll workers and BOE’s do?

Maybe a day of service at the polls might help.
 

Mad_Jack_Flint

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
2,669
Reaction score
1,943
Points
1,903
You have no concept that any president can, per the Constitution, challenge the results of an election, whether you like it or not.
Yes, but Trump knows he lost. He’s just trying to cheat the system. It’s as simple as that. He’s a whiny little bitch who can’t handle losing as with his supporters. This is the same moron who in 2016 claimed the election would be rigged if Hillary were to end up winning. This moron will say this shit regardless of the circumstances.
It is only rigged if he loses and he lost the election so it was rigged against him but he won the election then the process was fair as can be...

I love the simple minded way those like Trump think, and yes I was being sarcastic...
 

MaryAnne11

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2016
Messages
1,872
Reaction score
658
Points
200
Trump claims Biden’s win in states like PA was fraudulent. Trump takes this a step further by saying he won the state by “a lot”. Okay, so let’s say Biden’s win was fraudulent for the sake of argument. Where is the evidence that not only was his win fraudulent, but that Trump won it “by a lot” in reality? I mean Trump eking out a win is one thing, but winning the state by a lot? Where is the evidence of that? How stupid is he? This moron just pulls shit out of his ass on the spot.

On top of all of that, he demands Biden prove a negative. The burden of proof is always going to be on him and he’s too stupid to understand that I guess.


What does global warming have to do with the election?

But you better get used to it, we are now moving into the 21st century. 1950 is long gone.




Claims the idiot who can't provide a single empirical data set, nor comprehend what that even means, yet demand that we bow down to the cult of globull warming.
 

Mad_Jack_Flint

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
2,669
Reaction score
1,943
Points
1,903
You have no concept that any president can, per the Constitution, challenge the results of an election, whether you like it or not.
They can but when you have had 39 cases thrown out due to lack of evidence, numerous recounts giving your opponent more votes a normal person would accept the truth
But now Trump and his base want to see all eighty million people so they can believe that it truly happened and if Biden and his base do not produce those people, well then Trump and his base will declare it was all a lie and Trump is the winner of that chicken dinner...

Nothing will be acceptable for why Trump did not beat Biden and even God could come down and state Biden won and Trump would proclaim that is not God and Trump is God and his base would believe Trump...
 

MaryAnne11

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2016
Messages
1,872
Reaction score
658
Points
200
You have no concept that any president can, per the Constitution, challenge the results of an election, whether you like it or not.
Yes, but Trump knows he lost. He’s just trying to cheat the system. It’s as simple as that. He’s a whiny little bitch who can’t handle losing as with his supporters. This is the same moron who in 2016 claimed the election would be rigged if Hillary were to end up winning. This moron will say this shit regardless of the circumstances.
It is only rigged if he loses and he lost the election so it was rigged against him but he won the election then the process was fair as can be...

I love the simple minded way those like Trump think, and yes I was being sarcastic...
Could I change my name?
 

MaryAnne11

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2016
Messages
1,872
Reaction score
658
Points
200
You have no concept that any president can, per the Constitution, challenge the results of an election, whether you like it or not.
They can but when you have had 39 cases thrown out due to lack of evidence, numerous recounts giving your opponent more votes a normal person would accept the truth
But now Trump and his base want to see all eighty million people so they can believe that it truly happened and if Biden and his base do not produce those people, well then Trump and his base will declare it was all a lie and Trump is the winner of that chicken dinner...

Nothing will be acceptable for why Trump did not beat Biden and even God could come down and state Biden won and Trump would proclaim that is not God and Trump is God and his base would believe Trump...
Trump is not really the problem. Those who swallow his every lie are. We all know Trump has a cog loose.
 

Leo123

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2017
Messages
11,232
Reaction score
4,763
Points
400
It is only rigged if he loses and he lost the election so it was rigged against him but he won the election then the process was fair as can be...

I love the simple minded way those like Trump think, and yes I was being sarcastic...
I don't blame Trump, after 4 years of false accusations by the Democrats, a one-sided 'impeachment' and lie after lie by the Democrat establishment, I would be suspicious too. Trump should take every avenue he can to investigate voter fraud because we know the Democrats have already falsely accused Trump with all kinds of false accusations, wire-tapped him, blamed him for COVID and anything they can to get rid of him they even set the FBI and CIA against him. Why should he trust them at all? They are fully capable of throwing an election or worse.
 

MaryAnne11

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2016
Messages
1,872
Reaction score
658
Points
200
They can but when you have had 39 cases thrown out due to lack of evidence, numerous recounts giving your opponent more votes a normal person would accept the truth
Recounts that were not allowed to be observed.
Oh, dear Lord! Have you ever, just once worked at the polls or BOE’s?

Those so called watchers are paid by the Republican Party. More than the poll workers. The workers take training. Those so called poll watchers sit and watch, know nothing of the system that is set up to be safe with both parties as poll workers.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top