Trump desire to suspend the Constitution is not a deal breaker to Republicans

Ha, I don't think so. The cops and military are on our side and we have the most guns and men. Your side is full of sissies. Our women are more manly than your males.

What would make you think cops and military would support bizarre RW zealots who are shooting at them?
 
Ha, I don't think so. The cops and military are on our side and we have the most guns and men. Your side is full of sissies. Our women are more manly than your males.

Like they were on your side on Sedition Day?

:abgg2q.jpg:

Ashes Targetpractice resembles that remark.
 
Who stopped them from handing their evidence over to Fox News so that America could see there really was fraud???

The truth is -- they couldn't do that because they had no evidence. They were just trying to stall certification to whip up more doubt about the legitimacy of the election.
OAN
Newsmax

Each one would have taken it
 
What would make you think cops and military would support bizarre RW zealots who are shooting at them?
Since Trump, and never before him, endless talk of Civil War if they do not win elections, or do not get their way.

I wish W Bush would come out more and tell them to stop. But they do not care about him, anymore than they care about the facts told by ALL of them in Congress . There was no fraud. Biden won.

The end.

Let them talk, keep dreaming of the Confederate State which gratefully never came to be, and never will.
 
Since Trump, and never before him, endless talk of Civil War if they do not win elections, or do not get their way.

I wish W Bush would come out more and tell them to stop. But they do not care about him, anymore than they care about the facts told by ALL of them in Congress . There was no fraud. Biden won.

The end.

Let them talk, keep dreaming of the Confederate State which gratefully never came to be, and never will.

They were talking Civil War when Obama was elected also

Conservatives are too fat and lazy to follow through
 
FruitLoops, they claimed they had evidence of fraud. They based their claim of being in possession of evidence of fraud as the basis for holding an investigation.

YOU proved that was a bullshit claim on their part since you couldn't find any of their purported evidence. And rather than accept your own unwitting confession that they had no evidence, you made up the moronic excuse that they did have evidence; but you can't find it because they never made it public. As if they would sit on evidence for two years and not use it to show the election was stolen.

You're out of your fucking mind, FruitLoops. :cuckoo:
Wrong. The evidence they had was never seen or widely reported. If it was Trump wpould still be president. Hence no investigation and we fell to any enemy.
 
Who stopped them from handing their evidence over to Fox News so that America could see there really was fraud???

The truth is -- they couldn't do that because they had no evidence. They were just trying to stall certification to whip up more doubt about the legitimacy of the election.
Fox is controlled opposition. And none of it changes the argument put forth in that petition. Why can't you understand that?
 
Wrong. The evidence they had was never seen or widely reported. If it was Trump wpould still be president. Hence no investigation and we fell to any enemy.

LOL

You're beyond insane to claim they had evidence of election fraud that would have flipped the election to Trump -- but after two years, never shared it with anyone.

d445b99984c06f24e63036ac81e7501a.gif
 
Fox is controlled opposition. And none of it changes the argument put forth in that petition. Why can't you understand that?

Gatewaypundit
Naturalnews
Epochtimes
Breitbart
etc.....

There are plenty of site they could have shared it with to get the evidence out. Your patheticly lame excuses expose vacuity of your bullshit.
 
LOL

You're beyond insane to claim they had evidence of election fraud that would have flipped the election to Trump -- but after two years, never shared it with anyone.

d445b99984c06f24e63036ac81e7501a.gif
Did the other members of Congress let them show their evidence? Why not? Our republic was at stake. Traitors, you too.
 
Gatewaypundit
Naturalnews
Epochtimes
Breitbart
etc.....

There are plenty of site they could have shared it with to get the evidence out. Your patheticly lame excuses expose vacuity of your bullshit.
There you go again. They were not allowed to show it to Congress and therefore the American people reasons being there was massive fraud. They could not cover it up that fast. The main reason the investigation did not happen.

And remember Einstein, none of this matters to the fact that vote happened. Do you want rule of law?
 
Did the other members of Congress let them show their evidence? Why not? Our republic was at stake. Traitors, you too.

They weren't limited to showing evidence to other members of Congress, ya moron.

They couldwould have shown it to America.

You're out of your fucking mind, FruitLoops. :cuckoo:
 
There you go again. They were not allowed to show it to Congress and therefore the American people reasons being there was massive fraud. They could not cover it up that fast. The main reason the investigation did not happen.

And remember Einstein, none of this matters to the fact that vote happened. Do you want rule of law?

Your stupidity knows no boundaries.

You're literally claiming 147 members of Congress have evidence that would have flipped the election to Trump...

... and in 2 years, not one of them shared any of it with anyone else on the planet.

:cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:

Do you not even read the nonsense you post? Or do you just not understand it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top