Trump Demands Biden Remove Ad of Him Calling Dead Soldiers 'Suckers' and 'Losers'

[Leo123]

What difference does it make?

Because right now, you have no proof. Provide a link.

 

[otto105]

Most fact check sites are bastions for Liberal communist philosophy. Thanks for showing where you're coming from fuckup.

And more maga fuckup propaganda.

Again, thanks for the daily reminder of Fat Elvis’ 2920 Wisconsin election loss.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Former Presidents always negotiate with archives regarding their records.

Illegally refusing to return the materials is not negotiation. It's the opposite.

 

[otto105]

Illegally refusing to return the materials is not negotiation. It's the opposite.

Having his lawyers falsely sign a document claim all documents have been return when try weren’t is not negotiating.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Again, thanks for the daily reminder of Fat Elvis’ 2920 Wisconsin election loss.

You made this up oddo, it never happened, that loss is a provable lie. hilarious

 

[otto105]

You made this up oddo, that loss is a provable lie.

Hilarious

Show your work. I’ve got state certification of a fair and accurate election.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Show your work. I’ve got state certification of a fair and accurate election.

I was thinking more along the lines of showing your work genius.

2920 Wisconsin election loss.

Now that's what ya call...[finish it oddo here's a hint... ]

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Again, thanks for the daily reminder of Fat Elvis’ 2920 Wisconsin election loss.

Show your work. I’ve got state certification of a fair and accurate election.

Which if true is proof you possess fraudulent documentation that can prove an election that cannot possibly be "fair and accurate" is just not possible but it is typical.

Oddo, if ever there was a time for "Hilarious" it is now.

 

[Mac-7]

Did Trump Call Fallen Soldiers 'Suckers' and 'Losers'?

Thanks for confirming that story was a lie

From Snoops:

In sum, the claim stemmed from a story by The Atlantic, which relied on anonymous, second-hand reports of Trump's alleged words; there was no independent footage or documented proof to substantiate the in-question comments; and Trump vehemently denies that he once called service members "losers" and "suckers." While it was certainly possible that he said those things, Snopes was unable to independently verify the claim

It took them a long time to reach the bottom line, which is that Trump didnt do it

Being the lib news media they hated themselves for clearing trump, but they couldnt help themselves

 

[Mac-7]

You know it's true. You're putting on the act you think is required of you.

Snoops says it aint true

 

[ThisIsMe]

Yes, that's the lens the Trumpers see all people through. Because that's how the orange slob views the world. That's cultism for ya!

No, there was never any proof that Trump actually called anyone suckers and losers, except from anti Trump people.

You all believe it out of hand, because..Trump. Even though that allegation was never corroborated.

 

[otto105]

Which if true is proof you possess fraudulent documentation that can prove an election that cannot possibly be "fair and accurate" is just not possible.

Oddo, if ever there was a time for "Hilarious" it is now.

State certification as fair and accurate.

Disprove that the state didn’t certify. We also had recounts and a review by a conservative group that found more votes for Biden.

What do you have?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

State certification as fair and accurate.

Disprove that the state didn’t certify. We also had recounts and a review by a conservative group that found more votes for Biden.

What do you have?

Your post(s):

2920 Wisconsin election loss.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

State certification as fair and accurate.

impossible

Disprove that the state didn’t certify.

Ever hear the white liberal cliche, "ya can't disprove a negative"?

We also had recounts and a review by a conservative group that found more votes for Biden.

Holding up "a conservative group" as proof of legitimacy and honesty may be a good way to sell your made-up story but I aint buying it.

What do you have?

ODDO!... [allow me]..."Hilarious"

 

[Blisterfinger]

And more maga fuckup propaganda.

Again, thanks for the daily reminder of Fat Elvis’ 2920 Wisconsin election loss.

Thanks for being triggered by my symbol of your dishonesty LOL. You sure are gullible

 

[Blisterfinger]

What difference does it make?

You're welcome to go ahead and answer those questions.

 

[Marener]

You're welcome to go ahead and answer those questions.

So why did he lie about it?

 

[otto105]

impossible

Ever hear the white liberal cliche, "ya can't disprove a negative"?

Holding up "a conservative group" as proof of legitimacy and honesty may be a good way to sell your made-up story but I aint buying it.

ODDO!... [allow me]..."Hilarious"

Go right ahead and keep shitting the bed

https://wisconsinexaminer.com/2021/...no-fraud-but-attacks-election-administration/

 

[otto105]

Thanks for being triggered by my symbol of your dishonesty LOL. You sure are gullible

Again, whose triggered since I voted on the winning side.

You’re the stink hole with an election lie.

 

[otto105]

impossible

Ever hear the white liberal cliche, "ya can't disprove a negative"?

Holding up "a conservative group" as proof of legitimacy and honesty may be a good way to sell your made-up story but I aint buying it.

ODDO!... [allow me]..."Hilarious"

So, nothing.

You and blister