If Iran Backs a Terror Attack inside the United States and More or Less takes Credit for it, how Many of You would Demand Immediate U.S. Surrender?

Iraq had chemical weapons and transferred them to Syria before the war.



Another lie.

The chem used in Syria turned out to be Chlorine, not Sarin, and Putin claimed ISRAELI warplanes were in the area when it went off.

Another ZIONIST FASCIST HATE HOAX and exhibit A of which country in the Middle East is most likely to use WMD.
 
They surrendered in 1979; hell they were complicit!!!

Greg



So let's get this straight.

The US had no problem with Iran.

In 1953, Zionist Fascists engineered a coup of the Iranian DEMOCRACY at the time to install PRO ISRAEL DICTATOR the "Shah" and Americans were supposed to be happy about that. Then when that dictator got overthrown, the Zionist Fascist aspect of "US support" of the Shah got our embassy staff taken hostage. The Shah murdered tens of thousands of Iranians (many with US made weapons). The Iranians didn't like him. And the Zionist Fascists still love the Shah. Unreal...

This is the problem of having traitors in high places in our government 100% concerned with benefitting Israel not America.
 
Iran says it has "New Cards on the Battlefield" to play:


Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf sent a direct warning to President Donald Trump Monday on X, saying that Iran will not accept negotiations with the U.S. while under threat.
"Trump, by imposing a blockade and violating the ceasefire, seeks, in his view, to turn the negotiating table into a table of surrender or to justify renewed warmongering," he said.
"We do not accept negotiations under the shadow of threat, and over the past two weeks, we have prepared to reveal new cards on the battlefield," Ghalibaf added.


My best guess is that these "new cards" will actually be the same old card - terror attacks against civilians. But this time on U.S. soil. I don't believe Iran will openly admit they did it, but will say someting like, "Not suprising that oppressed people will rise up . . . " But it will be no secret who is behind it.

What will the posters on here say? I'm guessing many of the multiple account operators (the ballot harvesters of social media) will of course insist on the surrender option. Unless of course Trump goes way out of character and announced an immediate surrender a la Biden. Then those schizophrenia patients who should not be allowed near communication devices will say that was the worst thing that he could have done.

What should we do? Surrender, negotiate, fight harder, or something else?
The World needs to say Goodbye to Iran then.

IF IF IF they somehow could do it.

Buy they are Full of shit
 
Since all of the Zionist Fascist Traitors in this thread insist a 757 can fly at 530mph with nose 8 feet off the ground, we ought to round every one of them up, put them on a 757, and none of them get off the 757 until they "repeat the experiment."
 
Another lie.

The chem used in Syria turned out to be Chlorine, not Sarin, and Putin claimed ISRAELI warplanes were in the area when it went off.

Another ZIONIST FASCIST HATE HOAX and exhibit A of which country in the Middle East is most likely to use WMD.
LOL You moved the post to Syria where they used the Chlorine.

Iraq had Sarin. 1st Gulf War for sure. Marines I knew who went into Kuwait had their Sarin detectors going off. On many Humvees. We blew the sit out of their ammo dumps

Gulf War Syndrome is Sarin
 
LOL You moved the post to Syria where they used the Chlorine.

Iraq had Sarin. 1st Gulf War for sure. Marines I knew who went into Kuwait had their Sarin detectors going off. On many Humvees. We blew the sit out of their ammo dumps

Gulf War Syndrome is Sarin


And your point is???


Sarin was used by Saddam against Kurds and Iran.

They used artillery shells. They did not use Sarin against us because they did not have air superiority. Their Sarin was no threat to the US at all.

Every "Gulf War Syndrome" victim is 100% on you and every other Treasonous Zionist Fascist Warmongering Anti-Conservative Piece of Dogshit. The US had no US National Interest in Iraq, just as it has no US National Interest in Iran now.

You support selling out our troops to serve Israel. Period.
 
And your point is???


Sarin was used by Saddam against Kurds and Iran.

They used artillery shells. They did not use Sarin against us because they did not have air superiority. Their Sarin was no threat to the US at all.

Every "Gulf War Syndrome" victim is 100% on you and every other Treasonous Zionist Fascist Warmongering Anti-Conservative Piece of Dogshit. The US had no US National Interest in Iraq, just as it has no US National Interest in Iran now.

You support selling out our troops to serve Israel. Period.
As I stated dumbass was we hit their Ammo dumps which if you werent dumb as a rock is how it was released.

Iraq was given months to leave Kuwait.

They chose not to do so.

1777901987380.webp
 
Iraq was given months to leave Kuwait



By the "New World Order" of HW, who went to the UN and got 125 countries to unite under a UN flag to enforce UN defined borders.

But as a Zionist Fascist, you didn't like that. You wanted the US to flip off 124 allies and invade and occupy Iraq alone as Israel wanted, why you voted for Bill Clinton in 1992...
 
Yeah, what's 30,000 disssidents murdered while bragging about never giving up your nukes program?

1) Nowhere near 30K, no matter how much the Zionists Lie about it.
2) Even if it were true, 30K out of a population of 90 million, that's barely 0.03% of their population. (And again, the actual number is less.
3) Still none of our business. Interfering in the internal affairs of other countries never ends well for us.

Trump started this thing because Bibi (AKA The Head Jew) convinced him all he had to do was drop a few bombs and the Iranian people were ready to rise up.

Except. That didn't happen.

What did happen is that Iran realized it could choke our economy by blocking the Strait of Hormuz.
 
1) Nowhere near 30K, no matter how much the Zionists Lie about it.
2) Even if it were true, 30K out of a population of 90 million, that's barely 0.03% of their population. (And again, the actual number is less.
3) Still none of our business. Interfering in the internal affairs of other countries never ends well for us.

Trump started this thing because Bibi (AKA The Head Jew) convinced him all he had to do was drop a few bombs and the Iranian people were ready to rise up.

Except. That didn't happen.

What did happen is that Iran realized it could choke our economy by blocking the Strait of Hormuz.
What's your number, then?

Is it at least 10?


1777950126200.webp


Are you in favor of women's rights, and against capital punishment?
 
1) Nowhere near 30K, no matter how much the Zionists Lie about it.
2) Even if it were true, 30K out of a population of 90 million, that's barely 0.03% of their population. (And again, the actual number is less.
3) Still none of our business. Interfering in the internal affairs of other countries never ends well for us.

Trump started this thing because Bibi (AKA The Head Jew) convinced him all he had to do was drop a few bombs and the Iranian people were ready to rise up.

Except. That didn't happen.

What did happen is that Iran realized it could choke our economy by blocking the Strait of Hormuz.
yet you whine about 20k firearms deaths a year and here you are claiming 30 k is no biggy,
 
What's your number, then?

Is it at least 10?
Don't care. None of our business.
Are you in favor of women's rights, and against capital punishment?

If we aren't willing to draft an army and send it over there, our concern about something that happened 40 years ago is a little moot, isn't it?

The Iranian Regime is awful. It's also the result of our terrible policies. We spent 30 years propping up the Shah, and we deposed a democratically elected government to put him in power. The end result of his reign was that the Iranian Clergy became the most powerful political force in Iran even before the Shah was toppled.

So when the Shah fell, they were the only ones left to pick up the pieces.
 
yet you whine about 20k firearms deaths a year and here you are claiming 30 k is no biggy,

grant me the Serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
Courage to change the things I can,
And Wisdom to know the difference.

As an American, I can do something about gun violence by supporting sensible gun laws.

I'm not going to make the Iranians less... Iranian.

Iran has been a Shi'ite-dominated culture since the Safavid Dynasty chose Twelver Shi'ism as the state religion. Dynasties change, the nature of the people do not.

And we aren't going to change the nation's nature by blowing up a few girls' schools.
 
grant me the Serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
Courage to change the things I can,
And Wisdom to know the difference.

As an American, I can do something about gun violence by supporting sensible gun laws.

I'm not going to make the Iranians less... Iranian.

Iran has been a Shi'ite-dominated culture since the Safavid Dynasty chose Twelver Shi'ism as the state religion. Dynasties change, the nature of the people do not.

And we aren't going to change the nation's nature by blowing up a few girls' schools.
ohh I see deaths and statistics only apply when you say so.
 
15th post
Don't care. None of our business.


If we aren't willing to draft an army and send it over there, our concern about something that happened 40 years ago is a little moot, isn't it?

The Iranian Regime is awful. It's also the result of our terrible policies. We spent 30 years propping up the Shah, and we deposed a democratically elected government to put him in power. The end result of his reign was that the Iranian Clergy became the most powerful political force in Iran even before the Shah was toppled.

So when the Shah fell, they were the only ones left to pick up the pieces.
So you're kewl with any number of dissidents executed and Iran building any number of nukes.

Fine, but that puts you wsy out ofvthe mainstream.
 
Last edited:
So you're kewl with any number of dissidents executed and Iran building any number of nukes.

Fine, but that puts you wsy out ofvthe mainstream.

Does it?


The Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos survey, published this week, found that 61 percent of U.S. respondents said they believe the Trump administration erred in launching its military operation in the Middle Eastern country in late February.
 
Does it?


The Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos survey, published this week, found that 61 percent of U.S. respondents said they believe the Trump administration erred in launching its military operation in the Middle Eastern country in late February.
Well, of course.A washington post a b c news poll is going to reflect a strong liberal bias.

Even they would have a hard time coming up with poll in which the majority supported ignoring or minimizing thousands of murders by the islamic state of iran.
 
Back
Top Bottom