Trump classified documents case dismissed. Jack Smith loses again.

Where in the world does she get that from? The Senate has no power to do that, at all! They can not advise and consent and approve the Special counsel position in the Executive Branch WITHOUT a Presidential nomination??
LOL You still seem to be under the quaint notion that Biden (or his handlers) aren't pulling Garland strings. OK. Rather than going through the charade of the AG selecting the SC, the President selects them, then s/he need Senate confirmation
In the constitution, the Senate's power to give consent on the executive branch positions, comes only with principle officer nominations by the President. The the tens of thousands of other executive branch jobs and inferior officers are not given consent by the Senate, they do not have a say, they do not vote on them?

Unless I'm not understanding what Cannon is saying, it seems out of the norm whack O to me!

Nope. 14th and last time, Special Counsel has all the powers (arguable more) than any US Attorney, which require Senate approval.
We haven't had a liberal court since it ended in 1959 I believe, the Warren Court....and Warren was appointed by a Republican, Dwight Eisenhower. We've had a Republican Majority picked justices for over 60 years and a Republican supreme court justice rile as well.

The things this extreme conservative court are doing and has done, has been reversing decisions by previous Supreme courts that were conservative republican justices majorities.
Really? You didn't get Roe, Gay Marriage, Obamacare, Affirmative Action, Griswald .....
 
Fa

Faun is not very bright. And parroting ignorant talking points from his masters doesn't help.

If it's my "masters" I'm parroting, that makes the law my masters since that's who I'm parroting. I posted the laws which authorize the Attorney General to appoint Special Counsels. Which is what Garland followed. You're only rebuttal is, nuh-uh!
 
There's no instability, other than liberals have dominated the court for 50 +years and now it tilts conservative. We've dealt with liberal opinions for that 50 years, it's time for you to put on your big girl panties and deal with opinion you might not like.

I'm not seeing your confusion. The administration always picks special counsel. The only thing Cannon is saying is they have to be approved by the Senate - checks and balances, so you don't get hyperpartisan lunatics like Comrade Smith with unlimited investigative and prosecutorial powers.

You mentally deranged. :cuckoo:

The Supreme Court hasn't been Liberal since the 60's when Nixon replaced the Chief Justice.
 
You mentally deranged. :cuckoo:

The Supreme Court hasn't been Liberal since the 60's when Nixon replaced the Chief Justice.
I don’t know some would say the Burger Court that gave us Roe was pretty liberal
 
If it's my "masters" I'm parroting, that makes the law my masters since that's who I'm parroting. I posted the laws which authorize the Attorney General to appoint Special Counsels. Which is what Garland followed. You're only rebuttal is, nuh-uh!
Bzzzz. I even gave you a hint to cure your ignorance. But, like the tool you are, you ignored it.
 
English, do you speak it?
I suspect it isn't that one's first language. It's hard to tell from the written word, but I have seen signs of an Asian language speaker in that one.
 
Nope. 14th and last time, Special Counsel has all the powers (arguable more) than any US Attorney, which require Senate approval.
Then why haven't special counsel appointed by the AG since 1999, needed this before Cannon?

The position of special counsel or special prosecutor have been considered inferior officers, not primary officers, as all Assistant U.S. Attorneys are considered INFERIOR officers, all federal prosecutors are considered inferior officers. Only the U.S. Attorney of each judicial district, the appointed by the President heads of departnents...called the U.S.Attorneys for each judicial district are primary officers and appointed by the Pres.

Federal Prosecutors have every power to investigate and prosecute as the U.S. Attorney and they are not confirmed by the Senate...

and so does a special counsel have the ability, and his report is to the AG, and has to follow the parameters written in the hire agreement with the AG.

There is also a permanent Special Counsel office that was created by Congress for the executive branch to handle conflicts within their agencies...that requires the head of that Office to be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate....just like US Attorneys, but the prosecutors within that dept are inferior officers and are not appointed.

This Special Counsel Office, is not the same as hiring a temporary Special Counsel, is how it has been previously held by the courts....
 
I don’t know some would say the Burger Court that gave us Roe was pretty liberal

You're brain-dead. :cuckoo:

It was a 4-4 court with a conservative Chief Justice. That was not a Liberal court, I don't care how crazy you are.
 
Bzzzz. I even gave you a hint to cure your ignorance. But, like the tool you are, you ignored it.

LOL

Funny how you think i would take advice from the world's shittiest lawyer. Her own ruling dismantles her opinion and it will be reversed on appeal. But it's still a win for her and her buddy, Trump, since it stalls the trial until after the election.
 
You're brain-dead. :cuckoo:

It was a 4-4 court with a conservative Chief Justice. That was not a Liberal court, I don't care how crazy you are.
There were 9 justices not 8 on the Burger Court
 
15th post
Then why haven't special counsel appointed by the AG since 1999, needed this before Cannon?

The position of special counsel or special prosecutor have been considered inferior officers, not primary officers, as all Assistant U.S. Attorneys are considered INFERIOR officers, all federal prosecutors are considered inferior officers. Only the U.S. Attorney of each judicial district, the appointed by the President heads of departnents...called the U.S.Attorneys for each judicial district are primary officers and appointed by the Pres.

Federal Prosecutors have every power to investigate and prosecute as the U.S. Attorney and they are not confirmed by the Senate...

and so does a special counsel have the ability, and his report is to the AG, and has to follow the parameters written in the hire agreement with the AG.

There is also a permanent Special Counsel office that was created by Congress for the executive branch to handle conflicts within their agencies...that requires the head of that Office to be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate....just like US Attorneys, but the prosecutors within that dept are inferior officers and are not appointed.

This Special Counsel Office, is not the same as hiring a temporary Special Counsel, is how it has been previously held by the courts....
I repeat, 15th time, Special Counsel has all the powers (arguable more) than any US Attorney, which require Senate approval. They are not inferior officers.
 
LOL

Funny how you think i would take advice from the world's shittiest lawyer. Her own ruling dismantles her opinion and it will be reversed on appeal. But it's still a win for her and her buddy, Trump, since it stalls the trial until after the election.
The person you call "the world's shittiest lawyer" is still kicking your ass, Fawnboi.

:dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance:
 
LOL

Funny how you think i would take advice from the world's shittiest lawyer. Her own ruling dismantles her opinion and it will be reversed on appeal. But it's still a win for her and her buddy, Trump, since it stalls the trial until after the election.
Oh well. You can lead a horse's ass to water but ....
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom