Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 90,464
- 82,227
- 3,615
Trump is using the millions your Cult was spending on Tranny comic books.It is not free. Once it is built funding will have to be used for upkeep.
‘Win-win.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump is using the millions your Cult was spending on Tranny comic books.It is not free. Once it is built funding will have to be used for upkeep.
You guys sound like you don't care about the state of the White House at all....I suppose you think it would be fine if it started to crumble.
Deflection. I did not benefit from it.Obama added lines and a hoop to the already existing tennis courts.
Not really the same thing as tearing down an entire wing of the White House.
Obama used our money. Trump isn’t.Obama got approval from Congress based upon a report on the state of the White House that was completed by the GW Bush administration. The work upgraded water pipes and electrical systems and improved heating, cooling and fire alarm systems, some of which hadn’t been updated since 1902.
The American people do not mind spending money on upkeep of the White House since it belongs to them, not to whomever the current president happens to be.
Compared to Trump tearing down the entire east wing without asking anyone.
Seems you are your own worst enemy here.
And if you tear it down, it will cost millions to restore the grounds.It is not free. Once it is built funding will have to be used for upkeep.
The newest fad in office space design is "open space", rethink how Suzie could reorganize how she gets information...Correct. That is a wide open high ceiling space. Incorrect that it would impractical to repurpose it.
Leave the shell. Rip out the tacky decorations and strip it down to external walls. Since it's a wide open space already, they don't even have to worry about existing interior load bearing walls - as there aren't any.
Nope. All you would need is a few computer screens to keep with AI tracking of worldwide events and government responses in real-time to keep the president informed.The new Building will essentially be a 2 story building because of the high vaulted ceilings. If the rumored 90,000 square feet are true, that means it could be converted to two-story space probably in the order of 140,000 - 150,000 square feet (subtracting wall thickness, stairwells, and elevators as non usable space).
True, but that would not really take up much of the available floor space.That means cost savings because White House staff and those from other agencies that are dedicated to White House support that are currently housed on rented/purchased space in other buildings could be move to the repurposed building. WW
This one simple fact is simply too deep for the simple-minded socialists who automatically assume that government funds everything.Obama used our money. Trump isn’t.
And if you tear it down, it will cost millions to restore the grounds.
I think you meant the Democrats. 0bama's boondoggle library is only five years late and still hasn't opened. Mismanaged, shoddily built, over budget, and still not finished. A monument to leftwing incompetence.Frankly, I can't think of a better metaphor for the whole Trump Regime. They are very good at tearing things down, but they suck at actually building anything.
Did you know the East wing wasn’t part of the original White House? Pretty sure the new facility will work as a “receiving area” just fine.Just the opposite is true. We do care about the state of the White House which is why we are unhappy part of it was demolished.
Those that do not oppose this are the ones that do not care about the state of the White House.
This one simple fact is simply too deep for the simple-minded socialists who automatically assume that government funds everything.
Skipping to the good part:![]()
Construction of the White House Ballroom: Frequently Asked Questions | National Trust for Historic Preservation
Who owns the White House? The White House is owned by the federal government and is frequently said to be owned by the American people, as indicated on the National Park Service website.savingplaces.org
WW
What an absurd statement.It is an irrelevant fact.
Such as?If it gets built tearing it down would be stupid. Though I do like the idea of the other poster on here about repurposing it into something useful.
No stupid, it’s a huge fact.It is an irrelevant fact.
So who has standing to stop the president's Whitehouse renovation?If you do not own something, you are not allowed to modify it without permission.
The bolded here is a total lie...It's nonsense...Trump had to have approval from DC permitting, and Historical approval for ANY construction company to work on the building....That's just a fact.Obama got approval from Congress based upon a report on the state of the White House that was completed by the GW Bush administration. The work upgraded water pipes and electrical systems and improved heating, cooling and fire alarm systems, some of which hadn’t been updated since 1902.
The American people do not mind spending money on upkeep of the White House since it belongs to them, not to whomever the current president happens to be.
Compared to Trump tearing down the entire east wing without asking anyone.
Seems you are your own worst enemy here.
/thread.Skipping to the good part:
The government would be required to comply with the following processes before new construction at the White House:
These review processes also include the opportunity for the American public to comment on the project.
- The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) has review authority over new construction on federal properties in the capital region, including the White House, and NCPC has exercised that authority in recent years with the approval of a new security fence and a tennis pavilion at the White House.
- The Commission of Fine Arts (CFA) would have an advisory review before new construction takes place at the White House.
Under Article 2 the president has control of the NCPC. He can replace them at will.
Congress controls the purse, so one would think that congress would approve any funds for major renovations, but if the president uses donated funds there are no legal restraints to his renovations.
So who has standing to stop the president's Whitehouse renovation?
link or it didn’t happenAnd once he slaps his name on them he spends millions on renovations.
And they have 2 major Hotel projects in the works now.
You are clueless, as always.