You're a racist fool.You're an unreasonable fool.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You're a racist fool.You're an unreasonable fool.
They settled because the coward they made the so called Neighborhood Watch Captain was a coward with a gun, he would've never approached a gun man and he wouldn't have approached a teenager if he didn't have that gun. I find it amazing how grown men try to defend this coward, it really says a lot about your weak ass as well.The HOA'S insurance company stupidly decided to settle. They probably didn't want to be called racists.
I have never been overly impressed with home owners associations. Still it seems the homeowners association would have checked out Zimmerman to see if he was legit and certified.the home owners assosciation got sued by trayvons family because of george's fake neighborhood watch status. only like 4 or 5 people new who he was. the homeowners didnt tell anyone who he was and he was sertified neighborhood watch. he self appointed himself. trayvons family won that one.
I wasn’t even aware of the incident you mentioned. The news is my background music so apparently it didn’t get much coverage.Those same people, and probably you too, were quiet when a mob of blacks poured gasoline on a little, old, white, lady and then set her ablaze.
On another note, you sound like an atheist. Are you? A telling sign of an atheist is an aversion to truth.
So you finally admit there is a definite link. The first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem, tard.What made him a criminal? The fact that he was black.
So now it's white people who aren't allowed on public streets, if black hoodlums don't like it n stuff. lol you just can't keep from being a moron.Zimmerman could have stayed in his vehicle and not followed Trayvon as the dispatcher instructed him, he was the adult in this situation.
What should Trayvon had done that night? Do you agree that Trayvon was right to circle back and go out of his way to confront and attack George? You keep talking about what George should have done and never mention the guy that attacked him.If it involves Zimmerman‘s actions then tell me what you would have done if you had been in Zimmerman’s shoes that night.
I have never been overly impressed with home owners associations. Still it seems the homeowners association would have checked out Zimmerman to see if he was legit and certified.
So Zimmerman was a self appointed neighborhood watch captain and also a wannabe cop. That‘s a bad combination.
He went looking for trouble and it found him. There’s a moral to this story.
Zimmerman could have stayed in his vehicle and not followed Trayvon as the dispatcher instructed him, he was the adult in this situation.
wrong
nope
trayvn was never a criminal. duide was borderline stalking a kid,
What made him a criminal? The fact that he was black.
Zimmerman could have stayed in his vehicle and not followed Trayvon as the dispatcher instructed him, he was the adult in this situation.
He went looking for trouble and it found him. There’s a moral to this story.
It seems Zimmerman created his own neighborhood watch and made himself captain. His neighborhood watch was not part of the national neighborhood watch association.What do you mean by "certified"? Look, George was violently assaulted and he defended himself. End of story.
They got the goods on him. They need to prosecute whoever shot the kid. He has no protection under my law.
Peaden and Baxley, R-Ocala, say their law is a self-defense act. It says law-abiding people have no duty to retreat from an attacker and can meet "force with force." Nowhere does it say that a person has a right to confront another.
The 911 tapes strongly suggest Zimmerman overstepped his bounds, they say, when the Sanford neighborhood crime-watch captain said he was following Trayvon and appeared to ignore a police request to stay away.
"The guy lost his defense right then," said Peaden. "When he said 'I'm following him,' he lost his defense."…
[Baxley] stressed over and over again that "there's nothing in this statute that authorizes people to pursue and confront people."
On that we both agree. I carry sometimes. And you're right; even if it's justified, shooting someone can be a major hassle.If you are legally carrying a concealed weapon it is wisest to just walk away. If that makes you look like a coward to your friends, so be it. If your antagonist pulls a knife on you and you shoot him you will find yourself in BIG legal trouble. You may get off free in the end but it could bankrupt you. A risk benefit analysis would show walking away is the best choice of action. (Sometimes carrying a legally concealed handgun is a limiting factor. It is wise to be extremely polite and non confrontational when packing heat.)
Well, GZ wanted to know where the perp was going to so that he could alert police upon arrival. A true burglar probably would have been spooked by the unwanted attention and simply fled. Trayvon wasn't a burglar and became offended that "some weird cracker" (his words, remember?) was following him.I am saying that it was stupid to ignore the dispatcher’s advise to not follow Martin.
There is ZERO evidence that GZ "confronted" TM. On the contrary, TM's friend stated that TM was very close to the apartment and could have gone in but instead chose to go and confront the "weird cracker" that was following him.that Zimmerman's decision to pursue and confront Martin makes him ineligible for the law's protection. Durell Peaden, who sponsored the 2005 law as a Republican state senator, toldThe Miami Herald Zimmerman should be charged:
Please post his criminal recordHe was a black criminal? Hard to tell in the dark.