Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say.

[Skylar]

Explosives that low would not cause the top to collapse.

You never admitted that thermite is not an explosive.

Exactly. The building fell from the point of impacts of the planes, down.....one floor at a time, to the ground.

Which means that if it was explosive demolition, every single floor from the impact site to the ground would have been wired with hundreds and hundreds of charges.

With 200 or so outer panels and 47 core columns per floor, 91 floors in one tower and 79 floors to the ground on the other tower, that about 42,000 charges.

Yet nothing was ever found. Not before, not during, not after.

 

[Gamolon]

Thermite isn't an explosive.

And those beams were cut during the clean up with a plasma torch. As you already know, as we've shown you the pictures.

So you're actively lying now.

He's also been shown that one of Harrit's own people had shown a slide at a presentation comparing the "red chips" to "paint chips" and they both matched.

 

[the other mike]

Thermite isn't an explosive.

And those beams were cut during the clean up with a plasma torch. As you already know, as we've shown you the pictures.

So you're actively lying now.

You're the one lying.
All the kids know it.

 

[Skylar]

Angelo's been shown proof that these were cut by torches, but he still wants to peddle his garbage. He's also been shown that one of Harrit's own people had shown a slide at a presentation comparing the "red chips" to "paint chips" and they both matched.

These conspiracies are always in search of the least informed audience possible. The less you know about 911, the better these conspiracies land. The more you know, the more absurd the conspiracies are.

Take....Thermite. It burns so intensely that it can permanently damage your eyes if you look directly at a thermite reaction. Half of the structural columns holding up WTC 1 and 2 were on the outside of the building. The WTC 1 and 2 fell from top to bottom, from the point of impact to the ground, one floor at a time.

With 200 outer panels per floor, 91 floors to the ground on one tower and 79 floors to the ground on the other.....that's 34,000 thermite reactions that would have been visible on the OUTSIDE of the building. The towers would have lit up so brightly you would have been blinded if you looked at it. You could have seen it from space.

And yet, nothing. Not a single thermite reaction was ever observed before, during or after the collapse.

Not one. And their theory requires tens of thousands of them.

 

[Skylar]

You're the one lying.
All the kids know it.

Dude, you've seen the pictures of the clean up crew using plasma lances to cut away the very columns you insist were cut with 'thermite'. You know what they were cut by.....you've seen the pictures.

Yet you lie and make up stories about 'thermite'. Backed by nothing.

If your theory had merit, you wouldn't have to lie to support it.

 

[the other mike]

By the way, your strawman argument ;
"Thermite doesn't explode." is
irrelevant.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Thermite isn't an explosive.

And those beams were cut during the clean up with a plasma torch. As you already know, as we've shown you the pictures.

So you're actively lying now.

Thermite isn't an explosive.

They used "explosive thermite".
It's a secret formula.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Exactly. The building fell from the point of impacts of the planes, down.....one floor at a time, to the ground.

Which means that if it was explosive demolition, every single floor from the impact site to the ground would have been wired with hundreds and hundreds of charges.

With 200 or so outer panels and 47 core columns per floor, 91 floors in one tower and 79 floors to the ground on the other tower, that about 42,000 charges.

Yet nothing was ever found. Not before, not during, not after.

Right. And if you've already got all those rigs set up, why also use a plane (or drone or hologram)?
Wait until the buildings are full, set them all off. You'd kill many times the number.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

By the way, your strawman argument ;
"Thermite doesn't explode." is
irrelevant.

Concrete dust blown out the sides by air.
Where are the explosions?

 

[Skylar]

Thermite isn't an explosive.

They used "explosive thermite".
It's a secret formula.

Then their theory falls even faster. As their magical brand of 'explosive thermite' burns at many times the rate of actual thermite. They claim these reactions lasted for 3 MONTHS. Remember, thermite produces its own oxegen as it burns. It will burn under water.

The enormous pile of 'thermate' necessary to burn continually for 3 months would be larger than the WTC complex and burned so brightly you could see it from orbit.

And yet nothing. No reactions, anywhere.

Thermite, thermate, etc......is an awful theory that doesn't make a lick of sense and has jack shit to back it up.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Then their theory falls even faster. As their magical brand of 'explosive thermite' burns at many times the rate of actual thermite. They claim these reactions lasted for 3 MONTHS. Remember, thermite produces its own oxegen as it burns. It will burn under water.

The enormous pile of 'thermate' necessary to burn continually for 3 months would be larger than the WTC complex and burned so brightly you could see it from orbit.

And yet nothing. No reactions, anywhere.

Thermite, thermate, etc......is an awful theory that doesn't make a lick of sense and has jack shit to back it up.

And as you said, you'd need thousands of rigs, millions of pounds of thermite and miles of wiring to trigger the rigs. And none were found. And no untriggered rigs disrupted by planes crashing into the buildings were found. The claim is beyond idiotic.

 

[the other mike]

Concrete dust blown out the sides by air.
Where are the explosions?

Another straw man argument.
Lol.
Where are the normal collapses that should've happened ? That's the appropriate question here.

 

[Skylar]

Another straw man argument.
Lol.
Where are the normal collapses that should've happened ? That's the appropriate question here.
View attachment 543422

I don't think strawman means what you think it means.

 

[the other mike]

We'll never forget the 9/11 murder$.

 

[Skylar]

We'll never forget the 9/11 murder$.

You don't need absurdly complicated and laughably baseless conspiracy theories to remember those who died on 911.

 

[the other mike]

boom

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Another straw man argument.
Lol.
Where are the normal collapses that should've happened ? That's the appropriate question here.
View attachment 543422

What normal collapses should have happened? Where?

 

[Skylar]

boom

And there are the sound of explosions in ANY building or house fire too.

So much for 'boom'.

 

[Skylar]

What normal collapses should have happened? Where?

Angelo has no idea. You're asking someone who doesn't understand the conspiracies he's apeing to explain them.

That dog won't hunt.

 

[the other mike]

What normal collapses should have happened?

Study the architecture.
47 massive core columns in each tower just melting straight down
was impossible.