Today Kari Lake Admitted That She's Been Lying To You

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2010
71,539
51,518
3,605
*
This was her chance to prove that her election was stolen. She could have showed up in court and won this suit. All she had to do was present evidence. Now she's looking at a defamation judgement against her, and it could be huge. The person who sued her is a conservative Republican who would no longer put up with her lies and her slander against him.

And she backed right down.

How do you MAGA cultists feel about being lied to?


Kari Lake declines to defend her statements in a defamation case

Kari Lake, a Republican Senate candidate from Arizona who has advanced election conspiracy theories, is asking a judge to decide whether she must pay damages to a top county election official who sued her for defamation – after opting not to defend her statements in the case.

Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer last year sued Lake – who ran unsuccessfully for Arizona governor in 2022 – arguing that her repeated false claims of election malfeasance made him and his family the targets of relentless threats.

Richer and Lake are both Republicans, and his lawsuit marked an aggressive step by Richer to confront Lake’s election claims – which have been rejected by the courts.


Lawyers defending Lake, her gubernatorial campaign and an aligned nonprofit group on Tuesday asked a judge to schedule a hearing to determine what, if any, damages are owed to Richer.






In a statement, Richer said Lake and her allies had capitulated.


“After months of doubling down and defending their lies across Arizona, in the media, and on social media, when push came to shove, the Defendants decided to completely back down and concede that their lies were just that: lies,” he said.


“Because of their actions, my family and I have faced an endless barrage of threats — including calls for our execution — I have lost close personal relationships, and I have had my reputation irreparably damaged,” he added. “I have said from the beginning that no one is above the rule of law and today further validates that belief.”
 
Your thread title is a lie. Reported.
From the article;

". . . A Lake spokesperson said in a statement that “Kari didn’t surrender” in the case, “she simply cut-to-the-chase, demanding a hearing in 30 days, and proof of how her words (under the First Amendment) caused damages to Richer.”


The title of the thread is indeed, purposefully misleading.
 
From the article;

". . . A Lake spokesperson said in a statement that “Kari didn’t surrender” in the case, “she simply cut-to-the-chase, demanding a hearing in 30 days, and proof of how her words (under the First Amendment) caused damages to Richer.”

The title of the thread is indeed, purposefully misleading.
SSDD for good ol Synthaholic.
 
This was her chance to prove that her election was stolen. She could have showed up in court and won this suit. All she had to do was present evidence. Now she's looking at a defamation judgement against her, and it could be huge. The person who sued her is a conservative Republican who would no longer put up with her lies and her slander against him.

And she backed right down.

How do you MAGA cultists feel about being lied to?


Kari Lake declines to defend her statements in a defamation case

Kari Lake, a Republican Senate candidate from Arizona who has advanced election conspiracy theories, is asking a judge to decide whether she must pay damages to a top county election official who sued her for defamation – after opting not to defend her statements in the case.

Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer last year sued Lake – who ran unsuccessfully for Arizona governor in 2022 – arguing that her repeated false claims of election malfeasance made him and his family the targets of relentless threats.

Richer and Lake are both Republicans, and his lawsuit marked an aggressive step by Richer to confront Lake’s election claims – which have been rejected by the courts.


Lawyers defending Lake, her gubernatorial campaign and an aligned nonprofit group on Tuesday asked a judge to schedule a hearing to determine what, if any, damages are owed to Richer.






In a statement, Richer said Lake and her allies had capitulated.


“After months of doubling down and defending their lies across Arizona, in the media, and on social media, when push came to shove, the Defendants decided to completely back down and concede that their lies were just that: lies,” he said.


“Because of their actions, my family and I have faced an endless barrage of threats — including calls for our execution — I have lost close personal relationships, and I have had my reputation irreparably damaged,” he added. “I have said from the beginning that no one is above the rule of law and today further validates that belief.”
She did not back down about the fraud. That is what counts. Fail.
 
From the article;

". . . A Lake spokesperson said in a statement that “Kari didn’t surrender” in the case, “she simply cut-to-the-chase, demanding a hearing in 30 days, and proof of how her words (under the First Amendment) caused damages to Richer.”

The title of the thread is indeed, purposefully misleading.
That's called 'spin'. And it doesn't even address the claim that she actually won. What you are quoting is her refuting that she caused damages to Richer. But that's a no-win for her, either, as Richer has documented the death threats to himself and his family from her supporters.

FAIL!
 
She did not back down about the fraud. That is what counts. Fail.
4i6Ckte.gif
 
"The courts just refuse to look at any evidence we present!"

"Um ... okay, she had her chance to present all that damning evidence, and she declined to do so ... but that's because ... um ... um ... let me get back to you. I need to check party talking points!"
 
"The courts just refuse to look at any evidence we present!"

"Um ... okay, she had her chance to present all that damning evidence, and she declined to do so ... but that's because ... um ... um ... let me get back to you. I need to check party talking points!"
If you remember correctly the judge decided signatures could be verified in less than 30 seconds and that the signatures were approved without witnesses were valid. That is not justice that is just more lawfare.
 

Forum List

Back
Top