Time to drop a brick of epistemology on a table full of vibes. - Climate change

[Stryder50]

Damn but you are one stupid ass. So accepting scientific evidence makes you a Leftist/Marxist. LOL That is about as stupid of a statement as I have ever heard. You and others refuse to accept clear evidence, and prefer to stay in your alternative reality.

Accepting ONLY scientific data/evidence that confirms your prior bias while rejecting that which disputes, counters, and disproves such is what makes one, LIKE YOU, a stupid arse !

If you believe human caused CO2 emissions are a danger to life on this planet, than do the honorable thing and stop your own emissions of CO2 !

 

[Old Rocks]

View attachment 1217372

LOL So we have record cold caused by a very wobbly jet stream a couple of weeks ago, and in the coming days, red flag fire weather as we hit 80+ degrees in several states. In the second week of February. Red flag fire weather in Wyoming in the second week of February. LOL But there ain't now problem with extreme weather. LOL

 

[toobfreak]

Every scientific institution on Earth says climate change is real and human caused.

Already wrong. When your theory begins on a fake premise, how do you expect a valid outcome?

Or did you forget about ten years ago when all those emails were leaked by some big climate organization in Europe, where they admitted to each other in private how they had been fudging the data and throwing out any data which conflicted with their theory because they all stood to gain financially in income and job security if they kept reporting it an imminent threat.

Leaked Emails May Show Global Warming Research Is a Fraud | The Institute for Creation Research

www.icr.org

 

[Oddball]

LOL So we have record cold caused by a very wobbly jet stream a couple of weeks ago, and in the coming days, red flag fire weather as we hit 80+ degrees in several states. In the second week of February. Red flag fire weather in Wyoming in the second week of February. LOL But there ain't now problem with extreme weather. LOL

omg.....rofl....










Wait for it..........



























WEATHER ISN'T CLIMATE, MORON!

 

[Stryder50]

I'm tired. I'll debate more tomorrow. Goodnight everybody.

Don't bother.
Your case is invalid and a lost cause.

 

[Old Rocks]

Accepting ONLY scientific data/evidence that confirms your prior bias while rejecting that which disputes, counters, and disproves such is what makes one, LIKE YOU, a stupid arse !

If you believe human caused CO2 emissions are a danger to life on this planet, than do the honorable thing and stop your own emissions of CO2 !

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Sciences, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Against that we have a few individuals that choose to prostitute their credentials and always fail to present anything that could remotely be called valid evidence that CO2 and the other GHGs are not the cause of the present very rapid warming.

 

[Old Rocks]

omg.....rofl....










Wait for it..........



























WEATHER ISN'T CLIMATE, MORON!

Dumb ass, that was a reply to the fool that complained that we just had record cold in certain location.

 

[Stryder50]

LOL So we have record cold caused by a very wobbly jet stream a couple of weeks ago, and in the coming days, red flag fire weather as we hit 80+ degrees in several states. In the second week of February. Red flag fire weather in Wyoming in the second week of February. LOL But there ain't now problem with extreme weather. LOL

Fool !

That's not what is being said.

That the "extreme weather" is not human caused and is not solvable by human means is what is the REAL subject here.

 

[Oddball]

Dumb ass, that was a reply to the fool that complained that we just had record cold in certain location.

Whatever, asshole.

The goalposts will never move themselves...You'll always have a job.

 

[Old Rocks]

Don't bother.
Your case is invalid and a lost cause.

As each year grows warmer, and each has more extreme weather events, people like you will be justly considered to be mentally unsound.

 

[Old Rocks]

Fool !

That's not what is being said.

That the "extreme weather" is not human caused and is not solvable by human means is what is the REAL subject here.

Yes, much of it is damned well human caused. We have loaded the dice for extreme weather events by adding GHGs to the atmosphere. As far as unable to solve the problem, not in the short term now, as major cess in already in the pipe.

 

[Stryder50]

The defining experiment was done by Tyndall in the 1850's. It established that there are GHG's in our atmosphere, and even small amounts have major effects.

Tyndall's climate message, 150 years on

Irish physicist John Tyndall proved trace gases in the atmosphere can trap heat 150 years ago - so why isn't he better appreciated?

www.bbc.com

They trapped small and insignificant amounts of GHGs ...

 

[Stryder50]

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Sciences, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Against that we have a few individuals that choose to prostitute their credentials and always fail to present anything that could remotely be called valid evidence that CO2 and the other GHGs are not the cause of the present very rapid warming.

"EVERY" does not!
That is one of the many lies you ACC/AGW scammers keep presenting.
I've presented the disproofs in posts numbers;
380
357
356
341
333
326

I suggest you read and digest the data there.

 

[Stryder50]

Yes, much of it is damned well human caused. We have loaded the dice for extreme weather events by adding GHGs to the atmosphere. As far as unable to solve the problem, not in the short term now, as major cess in already in the pipe.

What portion of "one part out of 2,500 +" do you fail to grasp and understand regards scale of affect ?
Did you even pass your K-12 education ?!

 

[Stryder50]

Yes, much of it is damned well human caused. We have loaded the dice for extreme weather events by adding GHGs to the atmosphere. As far as unable to solve the problem, not in the short term now, as major cess in already in the pipe.

If you really believe that, than do the honorable and ethical thing and stop all your personal emission of CO2!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Dr. Lindzen. Big tobacco paid him to claim tobacco harmless, which he did in front of the US Congress. Fossil Fuels paid him to claim there is no climate change. Give him money and he will claim whatever you wish him to. He is a whore.

Thank goodness we have reliable scientists like Nobel Prize winner, Michael Mann. Right?

 

[Mushroom]

Thank goodness we have reliable scientists like Nobel Prize winner, Michael Mann. Right?

Michael Mann was never awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, the director of the Nobel Institute says, despite Mann’s public claims that he was.

The alarmists who participate in the IPCC report-writing process claim to be Nobel Prize winners to puff up their credentials to the media and to attempt to claim greater scientific credibility than skeptics in the global warming debate. Ironically, many skeptics also participate in the IPCC process, but few make the bold and self-serving claim of being Nobel Prize winners.

Washington Examiner writer Thomas Richard sent an email to Geir Lundestad, director of the Nobel Institute, pointing out how Mann claims to be a Nobel Prize winner. Richard asked if Mann’s Nobel Prize claim is true. Lundestad responded:

1) Michael Mann has never been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

2) He did not receive any personal certificate. He has taken the diploma awarded in 2007 to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (and to Al Gore) and made his own text underneath this authentic-looking diploma.

3) The text underneath the diploma is entirely his own. We issued only the diploma to the IPCC as such. No individuals on the IPCC side received anything in 2007.

Michael Mann Falsely Claims He Was Awarded Nobel Peace Prize - The Heartland Institute

Climate Change Weekly #68Michael Mann was never awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, the director of the Nobel Institute says, despite Mann’s public claims that he was.

heartland.org

I still remember that little dispute over a decade ago. And the funny thing is, even more than a decade later he still makes that claim.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Michael Mann Falsely Claims He Was Awarded Nobel Peace Prize - The Heartland Institute

Climate Change Weekly #68Michael Mann was never awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, the director of the Nobel Institute says, despite Mann’s public claims that he was.

heartland.org

I still remember that little dispute over a decade ago. And the funny thing is, even more than a decade later he still makes that claim.

He's always been a whiny ****.

 

[ReinyDays]

ROFL!

You really think that? EMH is actually almost exactly like you, as you both essentially do the exact same thing.

Without any examples, this isn't even science ...

AI will need all these energy sources ... solar, wind, hydro, nuclear, fossil fuels, cow belches ... all of it ... human safety isn't a consideration ...

 

[Anomalism]

What you and other Leftist/Marxist idiots fail to grasp is the issue isn't whether there is "Climate Change" or not.
Rather it is if such in recent centuries is mostly human caused = anthropogenic, or more of the Natural cycles that have been since the dawn of this planet and it's "climates".

I and others are of the position that it isn't human caused and that human meddling to fix what we haven't broken will cause more damage than to leave alone and adapt.

You’re making exactly the mistake Dunning Kruger describes. Collapsing different regimes into a single intuition and thinking that makes you right.

In deep time, CO2 often followed temperature because the dominant forcings were tectonic and orbital: continental drift changed ocean circulation, mountain building altered weathering rates, ice sheets expanded or collapsed, and those temperature shifts then caused CO2 to outgas from oceans or be drawn down. In that context, CO2 behaved mainly as a feedback.

Today the causal chain is reversed. That’s not a feedback, that’s an external forcing. Same molecule, different role, because the system boundary conditions are completely different.

Saying “CO2 was an effect before, so it can’t be a cause now” is a category error. It’s like arguing gravity can’t cause an avalanche because sometimes it only responds to snowpack changes. The physics doesn’t change; the context does.

So no, it’s not “because reasons.” It’s because timescale, mechanism, and system dynamics matter. And missing that distinction while accusing someone else of Dunning Kruger is…kind of the textbook example.