Electric busses crapping out in the cold!!

1770563199493.webp


 
clean energy & free energy are an oxymoron sales pitch via a shill industry that can't survive on the open market ~S~
Oh my, another dumb ass unable to read. 72% of new electrical generation in the US in 2025 was solar. Once installed, you don't need coal, gas, or nuclear material to generate electricity. And even with storage, it is still the least expensive form of generation available. Surviving? It is beating everything else on the market right now in spite of the opposition of the present kakistocracy. And in that ultra liberal state of Texas, they installed 20.7 million GW of solar last year. The bean counters for the utilities don't give a damn about what the stupidest President in our history does not like, they are responsible for getting the electricity to their customers at the best price possible.
 

“large amounts of annual waste are anticipated by the early 2030s” and could total 78 million tonnes by the year 2050.


~S~
 
15th post

“large amounts of annual waste are anticipated by the early 2030s” and could total 78 million tonnes by the year 2050.


~S~

"Are Solar Panels Recyclable? Absolutely!

Solar panels are highly recyclable, with components like glass, silicon, and metals that can be repurposed. At METech Recycling, we ensure every part of your old solar panels is processed safely, helping to reduce landfill waste and support a circular economy."

 

“large amounts of annual waste are anticipated by the early 2030s” and could total 78 million tonnes by the year 2050.


~S~
And just how recyclable is the nuclear waste from the present nukes? How about the material from mountain top mining and fly ash from coal fired plants? Entire watersheds have been poisoned from the coal mining industry. Even natural gas, touted as a clean alternative, has severe environmental effects.

While natural gas is often considered a cleaner alternative to coal and oil, its use has significant environmental impacts, particularly related to methane emissions and extraction processes.

Positive​

  1. Lower Carbon Emissions: Burning natural gas produces 50-60% less carbon dioxide (CO2) compared to coal and oil. This makes it a relatively cleaner fossil fuel in terms of direct emissions.

    1
  2. Reduced Air Pollutants: Natural gas combustion results in fewer emissions of various air pollutants, including sulfur dioxide (SO2) and particulate matter, which contribute to smog and respiratory issues.

    2
  3. Transition Fuel: Due to its lower emissions, natural gas is often viewed as a "bridge fuel" that can help transition from more polluting fossil fuels to renewable energy sources.

    1
  4. ODF.LPk9MGYjTk00dkPOgbPidw

    ODF.wWvxVIFIt9h4h7D9k6YYKg


    3 Sources

Negative​

  1. Methane Leakage: Methane, the primary component of natural gas, is a potent greenhouse gas with a global warming potential 25-86 times greater than CO2 over short time frames. Methane leaks can occur throughout the natural gas supply chain, from extraction to transportation, significantly undermining its climate benefits. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that methane emissions from natural gas systems account for about 33% of total U.S. methane emissions.

    3
  2. Extraction and Fracking: The extraction process, particularly hydraulic fracturing (fracking), can lead to environmental degradation. This includes potential groundwater contamination, habitat disruption, and increased seismic activity due to wastewater injection. Fracking requires large volumes of water, which can strain local water resources and affect aquatic habitats.

    3
  3. Air Quality Concerns: The extraction and combustion of natural gas can contribute to local air pollution. Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from burning natural gas can lead to the formation of ground-level ozone, which poses health risks, particularly for vulnerable populations.

    2
  4. Land Use and Ecosystem Disruption: The infrastructure required for natural gas extraction, including well pads and pipelines, can lead to habitat fragmentation and erosion, negatively impacting local ecosystems.

    2
  5. ODF.LPk9MGYjTk00dkPOgbPidw

    ODF.wWvxVIFIt9h4h7D9k6YYKg


    5 Sources

Conclusion​

While natural gas is often promoted as a cleaner alternative to other fossil fuels, its environmental effects are complex and multifaceted. The benefits of lower carbon emissions must be weighed against the significant challenges posed by methane leakage, extraction impacts, and air quality issues. Transitioning to renewable energy sources remains essential for minimizing environmental harm and addressing climate change effectively.

ecologiclife.com
What Are The Environmental Impacts Of Using Natural Gas


U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Natural gas and the environment - U.S.
 

~S~
So what you are saying is that MAGAt ideologues are anti-renewables, except when money is involved. Makes sense, as MAGAts have never been known for their moral clarity. Especially when money or underage girls are involved. After all, they are the party supported by the Epstein billionaire class.
 
Oh my, another dumb ass unable to read. 72% of new electrical generation in the US in 2025 was solar. Once installed, you don't need coal, gas, or nuclear material to generate electricity. And even with storage, it is still the least expensive form of generation available. Surviving? It is beating everything else on the market right now in spite of the opposition of the present kakistocracy. And in that ultra liberal state of Texas, they installed 20.7 million GW of solar last year. The bean counters for the utilities don't give a damn about what the stupidest President in our history does not like, they are responsible for getting the electricity to their customers at the best price possible.
72% of electricity generated, or 72% of generating capacity? I suspect the latter, because the capacity factor for solar is very low.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom