Three years left to limit warming to 1.5C, leading scientists warn

Actually, yes it does. There are multiple cycles that affect the Sun. Yes, the northern hemisphere gets the majority of Sunlight. So go figure.

All you are doing is arguing in a circle. The thermohaline circulation is in equilibrium, then, it isn't.

So the system works to bring itself back into equilibrium.

Your arguments have consisted of "the system is working go bring back equilibrium, that it was working to bring back.

You ignore the fact that the system WAS in equilibrium, then, some OUTSIDE force pushes it out of balance.
You are going to have a hard time proving those are responsible for abrupt climate changes. It’s not the sun. It’s how the ocean distributes heat to the arctic.
 
You are going to have a hard time proving those are responsible for abrupt climate changes. It’s not the sun. It’s how the ocean distributes heat to the arctic.
And you are ignoring the fact that the Sun drives the whole system.
 
Sure I can and have. Many times. In fact, I’m pretty I’ve discussed them with you in the past.

But you can't cite any of these thousands upon thousands of scientific papers today? ... no worries ... we're both on Summertime Daylight Savings ... it can wait ...
 
But you can't cite any of these thousands upon thousands of scientific papers today? ... no worries ... we're both on Summertime Daylight Savings ... it can wait ...



 
But you can't cite any of these thousands upon thousands of scientific papers today? ... no worries ... we're both on Summertime Daylight Savings ... it can wait ...
 
But you can't cite any of these thousands upon thousands of scientific papers today? ... no worries ... we're both on Summertime Daylight Savings ... it can wait ...
 
But you can't cite any of these thousands upon thousands of scientific papers today? ... no worries ... we're both on Summertime Daylight Savings ... it can wait ...
 
And you are ignoring the fact that the Sun drives the whole system.
You are going to have a hard time proving those are responsible for abrupt climate changes. It’s not the sun. It’s how the ocean distributes heat to the arctic.
In this case, it's humans adding fixed carbon to the climatic carbon cycle.

No, there is no debate. Stop wasting your time.
 
In this case, it's humans adding fixed carbon to the climatic carbon cycle.

No, there is no debate. Stop wasting your time.

That is why you are profoundly wrong because you idiotically think the science is settled when major legs of the AGW has already FAILED!

Where is the ******* Hot Spot.

Where is the dam Positive Feedback Loop.

Where is actual Climate Change.

You are the one who is lost in Pseudoscience crap.
 
15th post
That is why you are profoundly wrong because you idiotically think the science is settled when major legs of the AGW has already FAILED!
A stupid lie from an uneducated slob, of course.

The IPCC reports show what they show and conclude what they conclude, based on the preponderance of evidence.

No, internet randos with no education or experience in any related field and no published science are not upending the consensus of the evidence.

Normal peole do not need to be told this.
 
A stupid lie from an uneducated slob, of course.

The IPCC reports show what they show and conclude what they conclude, based on the preponderance of evidence.

No, internet randos with no education or experience in any related field and no published science are not upending the consensus of the evidence.

Normal peole do not need to be told this.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

See what I mean this idiot couldn't address my post content at all just spew out the usual word salad propaganda drivel that has become so common these days.

It is clear you can't refute anything because you are brainwashed to defend a failed pseudoscience AGW crap while your not knowing what it is about.

You are a sheep you sing Baa, baa, baaaa well.
 
Last edited:
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

See what I mean this idiot couldn't address my post content at all just spew out the usual word salad propaganda drivel that has become so common these days.

It is clear you can't refute anything because you are brainwashed to defend a failed pseudoscience AGW crap while your not knowing what it is about.

You are a sheep you sing Baa, baaaa well.
I'm not interested in your sad fetish, sorry.

When you have published your research in a respected journal, look me up.

Until then, I won't go to a car mechanic for brain surgery, and I won't turn to youtube educated halfwits for climate science information.
 
I'm not interested in your sad fetish, sorry.

When you have published your research in a respected journal, look me up.

Until then, I won't go to a car mechanic for brain surgery, and I won't turn to youtube educated halfwits for climate science information.

Just as I expected you have NOTHING here, you can't even answer these three statements at all:

Where is the ******* Hot Spot.

Where is the dam Positive Feedback Loop.

Where is actual Climate Change.

You need a new brain so you can post intelligently here!
 
Back
Top Bottom