Three years left to limit warming to 1.5C, leading scientists warn

It's the temperature of the entire globe dropping that causes glaciation.


Completely false and proven so by the fact that during the past

10k
20k
50k
1 million years


GREENLAND FROZE while NORTH AMERICA THAWED
 
Completely false and proven so by the fact that during the past

10k
20k
50k
1 million years


GREENLAND FROZE while NORTH AMERICA THAWED
Yeah, you're wrong, but keep playing your games.
 
Yeah, you're wrong, but keep playing your games.


It is amusing that both the CO2 FRAUD "supporters" who endlessly parrot "the climate scientists" and the Mossad "Faux Skeptics" here insist, the data isn't fudged, we can trust it, we just need to explain the"warming." That's why you are here, you Toddster, Dung, the Mossad "Faux Skeptics."

YOU CANNOT REFUTE ONE WORD OF EITHER OF THESE TWO OPS....








and the crap you push, Solar Cycle and "water causes ice," are easily refuted, and have been over and over.
 
It is amusing that both the CO2 FRAUD "supporters" who endlessly parrot "the climate scientists" and the Mossad "Faux Skeptics" here insist, the data isn't fudged, we can trust it, we just need to explain the"warming." That's why you are here, you Toddster, Dung, the Mossad "Faux Skeptics."

YOU CANNOT REFUTE ONE WORD OF EITHER OF THESE TWO OPS....








and the crap you push, Solar Cycle and "water causes ice," are easily refuted, and have been over and over.
No, I'm here because I like to amuse myself. I'm also a scientist so I try and educate those who wish to learn.

You, OTOH, are a anti Semitic loon who posts nonsense for purely silly reasons.
 
No, I'm here because I like to amuse myself. I'm also a scientist so I try and educate those who wish to learn.

You, OTOH, are a anti Semitic loon who posts nonsense for purely silly reasons.


LOL!!!

Just like the woke, always hiding your deficiency behind an ism...

Got your motorized paraglider yet??
 
UV radiation drops by 7%. That causes the global temperature to drop. But it isn't sudden, for a while. It takes time for that cumulative affect to happen.

But when it does, the RESULT is sudden, in a relative manner.

Think of a balloon bursting thanks to overfilling. The balloon grows over time, but then fails suddenly.

You have no idea what you're talking about.
 
LOL!!!

Just like the woke, always hiding your deficiency behind an ism...

Got your motorized paraglider yet??
Hiding? I am right here, in YOUR face, calling you out for loon that you just happen to be.

Go piss up a rope, loser.
 
Hiding? I am right here, in YOUR face, calling you out for loon that you just happen to be.

Go piss up a rope, loser.


That's the "rebuttal"

LOL!!!
 
All I need, clown boy.


Mossad "science" = toss cards when busted lying

CO2 FRAUD
JFK
USS Liberty
911
Covid
Covid Vax

Y'all are behind ALL of that...
 
It's the temperature of the entire globe dropping that causes glaciation.

Your argument is circular, "the glaciation occurs because currents are equilibriating what the currents are doing"

Is essentially what you are saying. You ignore the fact that the climate system is driven by energy. Add energy and the currents function.

Take energy away and the currents falter.

It is my THEORY that the source of that energy is the Sun. I can support that theory with empirical data which exists in the paleoclimate record.

You are free to think otherwise.
Incorrect. Disruption of heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic initiates northern hemisphere glaciation. The negative feedback (albedo) causes extensive continental glaciation which causes the oceans and atmosphere to cool as more solar radiation is reflected back into space without warming the surface of the planet.
 
Incorrect. Disruption of heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic initiates northern hemisphere glaciation. The negative feedback (albedo) causes extensive continental glaciation which causes the oceans and atmosphere to cool as more solar radiation is reflected back into space without warming the surface of the planet.

Did you check your math? ... there should be the cosine of latitude in there someplace ... plus we use watts per square meter ... that's a power value ... and we have twice as many tropical ocean square meters than polar ice cap square meters ...

The effects of polar albedo are negligible ... and the air is bone dry, and extra energy will be used to sublimate ice rather than raise temperatures ... there's still meteorology going on here along with the radiative physics ...
 
Did you check your math? ... there should be the cosine of latitude in there someplace ... plus we use watts per square meter ... that's a power value ... and we have twice as many tropical ocean square meters than polar ice cap square meters ...

The effects of polar albedo are negligible ... and the air is bone dry, and extra energy will be used to sublimate ice rather than raise temperatures ... there's still meteorology going on here along with the radiative physics ...
30 glacial cycles over the last 3 million years says otherwise.
 
Incorrect. Disruption of heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic initiates northern hemisphere glaciation. The negative feedback (albedo) causes extensive continental glaciation which causes the oceans and atmosphere to cool as more solar radiation is reflected back into space without warming the surface of the planet.
Interesting. So explain the glacial periods that occurred before the formation of the continents. We know of at least two.
 
Interesting. So explain the glacial periods that occurred before the formation of the continents. We know of at least two.
I can only explain the climate of the past 50 million years because that’s all I have studied because that’s all I needed to study. Totally different landmass configurations will have totally different climate drivers.

Our present landmass configuration is unique. Never before in earth’s history has both poles been thermally isolated from warm marine currents like they are today.
 
15th post
30 glacial cycles over the last 3 million years says otherwise.

That there's no math ... or you did the math and it proved you wrong ... or you know it would prove you wrong so you just didn't bother ...

How are you compensating for sublimation is all I asked ... if you aren't then just say so ... nevermind cos 90º = 0 ... just forget I ever brought it up ...
 
I can only explain the climate of the past 50 million years because that’s all I have studied because that’s all I needed to study. Totally different landmass configurations will have totally different climate drivers.

Our present landmass configuration is unique. Never before in earth’s history has both poles been thermally isolated from warm marine currents like they are today.
But the Sun never plays a part in it? Interesting.
 
That there's no math ... or you did the math and it proved you wrong ... or you know it would prove you wrong so you just didn't bother ...

How are you compensating for sublimation is all I asked ... if you aren't then just say so ... nevermind cos 90º = 0 ... just forget I ever brought it up ...
You don’t need math to know that parts of Northern Europe would be 30 degrees colder without heat circulation from the equator. And you don’t need math to know the threshold for Arctic glaciation. And you don’t need math to know the surrounding lands are subject to extensive continental glaciation. And you don’t need math to know that extensive northern hemisphere glaciation has a cooling effect all across the planet.

You only need to read the ******* oxygen isotope curve.
 
But the Sun never plays a part in it? Interesting.
I think it does but it is a supporting role. I think it plays a minor role in temperature changes and a major role in wind patterns. Wind patterns and density differences drive the ocean circulation which is where the majority of heat is.
 
Back
Top Bottom