I do wish the idiot 25 percent would just admit...they have difficulty with the English language, and no concept at all of world history, which is why they reject the Bible.
It frustrates them because they aren't smart enough to figure it out.
Here's a tip...pray for enlightenment. And commit to increasing your understanding.
It's amazing what a little earnest application of one's intellect, and a little help from the Holy Spirit, can achieve.
I did look into it and what I found what that there is no evidence to support any of the claims made in the Bible concerning the existence of a god. Any evidence proposed by theists to support the Bibles various historical and supernatural claims is non-existent at best, manufactured at worst.
The Bible is not self-authenticating; it is simply one of many religious texts. Like those others, it itself constitutes no evidence for the existence of a god. Its florid prose and fanciful content do not legitimize it nor distinguish it from other ancient works of literature.
The Bible is historically inaccurate, factually incorrect, inconsistent and contradictory. It was artificially constructed by a group of men in antiquity and is poorly translated, heavily altered and selectively interpreted. Entire sections of the text have been redacted over time.
It infuriates me because you aren't smart enough to figure this out.
I know it infuriates you. Rage is symptomatic of rejection of God.
You didn't look into the Bible. You went looking for reasons to reject it. you didn't study the text, you didn't delve into history, you didn't objectively compile and review. I doubt you have spent any time in any church as an adult, and if you did, it was because you were *forced* to, and you went with a shuttered and hostile mind.
Your information is carefully filtered through a screen of anger and frustration..you are frustrated because you don't *get* it...and instead of continuing to look into it, like a stupid, spoiled brat you throw the toys down and start throwing things at the other kids.
You're the one who doesn't understand. You're the one with the closed mind and the limited understanding of the suject matter.
And that, in turn, makes you angry.
Which you mistake for some sort of superior understanding.
You are so wrong. I'm not angry. You said we INFURIATE you. Who's the angry ***** now?
No, I really really wanted to believe in god. I read the bible with an open mind and heart. I just didn't go into it believing. I had so many questions and every one of you mother fuckers kept saying, "just read the bible then we'll talk". Well I read it and still have questions and doubt. Now what? Sorry you read it and it successfully brianwashed you.
1. I couldn't get past the fact that There is no evidence to support any of the claims made in the Bible concerning the existence of a god. Any evidence proposed by theists to support the Bibles various historical and supernatural claims is non-existent at best, manufactured at worst.
The Bible is not self-authenticating; it is simply one of many religious texts. Like those others, it itself constitutes no evidence for the existence of a god. Its florid prose and fanciful content do not legitimise it nor distinguish it from other ancient works of literature.
The Bible is historically inaccurate, factually incorrect, inconsistent and contradictory. It was artificially constructed by a group of men in antiquity and is poorly translated, heavily altered and selectively interpreted. Entire sections of the text have been redacted over time.
2. Atheists are most often called militant when they passionately defend reason and advocate critical thinking. The bar theists set for perceived hostility appears to be any atheist simply voicing an opinion in dissent of religious belief. In contrast, the bar atheists set for perceived theistic hostility is any form of religiously motivated violence or oppression.
Atheism does not preclude someone from being argumentative or insensitive; those things are simply seen as being preferable to killing one another over an imaginary friend.
A militant atheist will debate in a University theatre or appeal for the separation of religion and government. A militant theist will kill doctors, stone women to death, incite religious war, restrict sexual and gender equality and convince children they are flawed and worthless all under the instruction of their imagined god or holy book.
It can be argued that there is no such thing as a militant atheist, that the term is itself a misnomer, because there is simply no ideology or philosophy in atheism to be militant about. If an atheist is someone who lacks belief in gods, then a militant atheist is apparently someone who passionately lacks a belief in gods. All other possible beliefs and ideologies including any desire to oppress theism come from outside atheism. This is in contrast to religious belief, which often includes a set of laws and commandments purportedly derived from a supernatural source about which one can be militant.
Note: Militant atheism is most often confused with gosateizm (state atheism), which was based on the ideology of Marxism-Leninism. It was this ideology which was responsible for the oppression and murder of theists under several 20th century communist regimes. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in gods with no inherit moral, political or philosophical baggage.
3. For a long time I didn't believe christianity but I still believed in god. I believed I had a personal relationship with god. Then I talked with some atheist friends and they were successful at opening my eyes to the real truth.
Funny you think you have the truth but you can't convert more jews, muslims and mormons??? I guess none of them/us are buying it. But the jews and muslims happen to be just as stupid as you.
I'm not mad, other than I don't want your god or any god being forced on us. Keep that shit to yourself and we'll get along just fine.
