"Those people need to be locked up."

[the other mike]

Hey Joe. Where you goin' with that gun in your hand ?

The controversial 1994 crime law that Joe Biden helped write, explained

Biden has taken credit for the 1994 crime law. But critics say the law contributed to mass incarceration.

www.vox.com

That was Joe Biden in 1994.

 

[theHawk]

Wow. Can’t wait to hear what IM2 has to say about this.

“It doesn’t matter if they are victims of systemic racism.”

“You can’t go to a 7-11 or Dunkin Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent”.

“Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids”.

 

[keepitreal]

Hey Joe. Where you goin' with that gun in your hand ?

The controversial 1994 crime law that Joe Biden helped write, explained

Biden has taken credit for the 1994 crime law. But critics say the law contributed to mass incarceration.

www.vox.com

That was Joe Biden in 1994.

ROFLMFAO...tough on crime....hmmm, let's see

Sanctuary cities

Free healthcare for illegals

Shitting, pissing and shooting up drugs wherever in the streets, parks
subways, parking lots, school zones in San Francisco

Injection safe houses to inject drugs and chiiiiiill afterwards in San Francisco
Narcan, syringes, rubber hoses, spoons, radio provided for your convenience
(Please bare with us, we are working on providing your Heroin as soon as possible)

Theft under $1,000 dollars is punishable by a citation in San Francisco

San Francisco is a hot mess...how they are allowed to get away with this shit

I find it quite odd, given the circumstances, there have been no mass shootings

 

[IM2]

Donald Trump Says Central Park Five Are Guilty, Despite DNA Evidence. Wading into a racially-charged case from his past, Donald Trump indicated that the "Central Park Five" were guilty, despite being officially exonerated by DNA evidence decades after a notorious 1989 rape case.

 

[IM2]

 

[Slade3200]

Hey Joe. Where you goin' with that gun in your hand ?

The controversial 1994 crime law that Joe Biden helped write, explained

Biden has taken credit for the 1994 crime law. But critics say the law contributed to mass incarceration.

www.vox.com

That was Joe Biden in 1994.

Ok, what’s your point?

 

[IM2]

 

[IM2]

 

[IM2]

 

[IM2]

Trump Calls Mexican's Rapists

 

[BULLDOG]

Hey Joe. Where you goin' with that gun in your hand ?

The controversial 1994 crime law that Joe Biden helped write, explained

Biden has taken credit for the 1994 crime law. But critics say the law contributed to mass incarceration.

www.vox.com

That was Joe Biden in 1994.

In 1994 the mood of the country was that we should get really tough on crime. The Congressional Black Caucus backed it 100%. Black mayors, religious figures, and political leaders from across the country wrote letters endorsing the bill. There was opposition from republicans, but their stated reason for their opposition was that they thought the bill was too soft on crime. We were all wrong, but Biden wasn't the reason for such a drastic bill. The country as a whole is responsible for that.

 

[Muhammed]

View attachment 341489

Donald Trump Says Central Park Five Are Guilty, Despite DNA Evidence. Wading into a racially-charged case from his past, Donald Trump indicated that the "Central Park Five" were guilty, despite being officially exonerated by DNA evidence decades after a notorious 1989 rape case.

They were not exonerated by DNA evidence. Logically, from a scientific standpoint, that's not even possible. Some people are so fucking stupid that they cannot comprehend the evidentiary value of DNA samples. Logically, absence of DNA evidence does not constitute evidence. And back then criminal DNA forensics was in it's infancy, anyhow.

Furthermore, for the most part, (all but one of them confessed IIRC and the one who didn't confess was ratted out by his accomplices) the CP5 were confessed robbers, muggers and rapists, not murderers. Nobody was killed during their violent crime spree in Central Park, and nowhere in that article (that you obviously never read) did Trump advocate the death penalty for robbery, mugging or rape.

You drank the grape kool-aid again, dumbass. Rather than reading the article yourself, you got brainwashed into believing that Trump advocated the death penalty for the CP5 in the article.

 

[theHawk]

View attachment 341492

Yes, MS-13 illegals are bringing in drugs and are rapists.

Yes, many countries out there are shit holes. When was the last time you took a vacation to Niger or Somalia? Yea, that’s what I thought, you would never dream of it.

 

[theHawk]

View attachment 341493

Poor IM2, has to use false quotes and debunked memes to deflect for Racist Joe.

 

[TNHarley]

View attachment 341489

Donald Trump Says Central Park Five Are Guilty, Despite DNA Evidence. Wading into a racially-charged case from his past, Donald Trump indicated that the "Central Park Five" were guilty, despite being officially exonerated by DNA evidence decades after a notorious 1989 rape case.

Deflect for your rich racist old white masters, boy. Its what your good at
You fucking chump

 

[Street Juice]

View attachment 341489

Donald Trump Says Central Park Five Are Guilty, Despite DNA Evidence. Wading into a racially-charged case from his past, Donald Trump indicated that the "Central Park Five" were guilty, despite being officially exonerated by DNA evidence decades after a notorious 1989 rape case.

Here, fool:

The five accused rapists — Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray, Raymond Santana, Yusef Salaam and Kharey Wise — were convicted of the 1989 Central Park rape, as well as other assaults in the park that night; “exonerated” 13 years later; and, more than a decade after that, paid $40 million by the city of New York to “settle” a malicious prosecution case within months of Bill de Blasio becoming mayor, despite city lawyers’ confidence that they would win at trial.

To his credit, Mayor Michael Bloomberg refused to give the “exonerated” convicts a dime. Today, they are civil rights heroes to Hollywood airheads and others completely unfamiliar with the facts of the case.

Here is just some of the evidence against them. Santana was one of the first boys picked up in the park the night of the attacks, April 19, 1989. While being driven to the precinct house, he blurted out: “I had nothing to do with the rape.”
At this point, the jogger hadn’t been found. The police knew nothing about any rape. Richardson rode to the precinct with another boy, who announced to the police that he knew who did “the murder,” naming Antron McCray. Richardson concurred, saying, “Yeah. That’s who did it.”

Again, the police didn’t know about the jogger yet. (It’s not surprising that the boys thought she was dead: Her doctors didn’t expect her to live through the night.)

Over the next few days, five teenaged boys gave detailed confessions about the attack on the woman, as well as the other attacks. All five made their confessions in the presence of their parents or guardians.

It is absolute madness to imagine that officers did anything to coerce these confessions. When the boys confessed, no one — not them, not the prosecutors, not the police interviewing them — had any idea whether the jogger would emerge from her coma, remembering everything. (Mercifully, she remembered nothing.)
Why on earth would cops bully five random teenagers into false confessions, knowing that the victim might wake up at any moment and announce, My boyfriend did it! That would be rather awkward for any cop who’d gotten someone else to confess.

In a six-week pretrial hearing, the boys’ confessions were subjected to relentless assault by defense attorneys. The confessions were attacked again during both trials and on appeal. The trial judge, the two multi-ethnic juries and the appellate court judges found the confessions voluntary — and damning.

Salaam confessed to the rape after the detective questioning him said that fingerprints had been found on the jogger’s clothing, and if the prints were his, he was “going down for the rape.” Salaam confessed immediately.
At the risk of sounding as stupid as a liberal, one of the most disheartening aspects of the “Central Park 5” folktale is that several of the boys had lovely parents, who came to the police station and sternly instructed their sons to tell the truth.
They were kids, 14- and 15-year-olds, except for one who was 16.

It was monstrous what they did, but some of them surely got caught up with the mob, hormones raging, and did things they never would have done on their own.

But instead of learning a somber lesson from their parents, paying the price and emerging better men, they have learned a much different lesson from our media: It doesn’t matter what you do to another human being; cry “racism,” and you will be rewarded with untold riches and celebrity.

credit: Ann Coulter

 

[IM2]

Well guys the Central Park 5 were cleared by the confession of the person who actually committed the crime. MS13 originates in America and what Joe Biden said is a common sentiment in the black community. That's why trump supporting blacks are called Uncle Toms.

 

[Street Juice]

The confession of a lifer who became a prison hero when he said he acted alone. The cops involved in the case have never been allowed to interview him. The five were guilty as sin. They all confessed themselves with their parents in the room. They knew details about the crime scene that only perpetrators could have known. And they were accusing each other of the rape/murder in front of the cops before she had even been found. What's sad is that the parents who took these boys down to the precinct and told them to man up and do the right thing were wrong. Those boys and every young black kid out there looks at the Central Park Five and see that you can lie and commit horrific crimes and it will make you famous and rich. Blind, hate-filled idiots like you, who so hate the white race, actually do more harm to your own race than white people ever could.