This judge hasn't been paying attention.

[CrusaderFrank]

Judge pleads with Trump administration for “reason over rhetoric” in deportation case​

A federal judge said the Trump administration is falsely blaming him for a crisis of its own making: the rushed deportation of seven men to South Sudan in violation of court orders and constitutional due process.

U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy said Monday the hurried deportations were an overt violation of orders he put in place weeks ago, which required the administration to provide “meaningful” notice before deporting people to countries where they could face torture or death. Even after the violation, Murphy said he exercised restraint by not forcing the administration to bring the seven convicted violent criminals back to the United States.

“It continues to be the court’s hope that reason can get the better of rhetoric,” Murphy wrote in his withering Monday night order rejecting the Trump administration’s demand that he reconsider or delay the effect of his ruling. “The orders put in place here are sensible and conservative.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/27/judge-trump-south-sudan-deportation-case-00369946

Asking the regime for reason is like asking trump to admit he really did molest the 26 women who have accused him of various kinds of sexual assault. It ain't going to happen.

Ignore this Judge, he’s way out of his lane

 

[Rawley]

I don't think that is true.

You 'thought' a lot of things yesterday. And were wrong on every single one of them. We're not going down your rabbit holes again.

I know some were under a "withholding from removal" order

I won't hold my breath waiting for your link to these orders

 

[struth]

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/233150241700500207

How do you think linking me to an article from two people that don't like the law proves your point? If you had an opinion from a Court saying it was unConstitutional I might be see your point.

But here's the reality, you had no clue what the law even was until a month ago when everyone highlighted to you dembots that Trump was in fact following the law, and showed you the law.

 

[rightwinger]

Don't remember Biden doing that? Spitting the SC's face?

Biden followed the Supreme Courts direction

 

[Winston]

You 'thought' a lot of things yesterday. And were wrong on every single one of them. We're not going down your rabbit holes again.


I won't hold my breath waiting for your link to these orders

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.1.0.pdf

How many you want?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Even after the violation, Murphy said he exercised restraint by not forcing the administration to bring the seven convicted violent criminals back to the United States.​

Does Murphy (or berg80) realize how lame that sounds?

"I coulda kicked his ass . . . but I'm a peaceful man."

How could a low-level judge force the government to bring violent criminals who jumped the border back to the United States?

What leverage does he think he has?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Biden followed the Supreme Courts direction

He followed the letter, but not the spirit.

Is Trump wrong to do the same?

 

[Rawley]

Biden followed the Supreme Courts direction

Sure. And he was sharp as a tack and on the top of his game.

 

[Rawley]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.1.0.pdf

How many you want?

Dude. literally, what the fuck? THIs thread is about seven scumbags deported to Sudan.

Did you skip you ADD medicine again?

 

[rightwinger]

Sure. And he was sharp as a tack and on the top of his game.

Has nothing to do with Biden following the direction of the Supreme Court

Why can’t Trump?

 

[Winston]

How do you think linking me to an article from two people that don't like the law proves your point? If you had an opinion from a Court saying it was unConstitutional I might be see your point.

But here's the reality, you had no clue what the law even was until a month ago when everyone highlighted to you dembots that Trump was in fact following the law, and showed you the law.

That was not an opinion piece. It is called a "white paper", look up the term, and it was very well sourced. And the cool part, the study was completed just after Biden took office. It is mostly a critique of the first Trump administrations actions.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

What are they deprived of when they're deported?

 

[struth]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.1.0.pdf

How many you want?

um, you know that link is to a district court order, that was overturned by the SCOTUS

The SCOTUS said that the Trump admin had to make easy, Garcia's return to be deported again. They have.

 

[struth]

That was not an opinion piece. It is called a "white paper", look up the term, and it was very well sourced. And the cool part, the study was completed just after Biden took office. It is mostly a critique of the first Trump administrations actions.

No, it's an opinion piece in a journal. That's it. Who cares if it's well sourced or not? I didn't say it wasn't written nicely. I just said it's not relevent and doesn't prove your point. I get some people don't like the law now.

No dembot, it was written in 2017, just went Trump took office and inherited the worst refugee crisis since WW2, from Obama and Xiden.

 

[MarcATL]

They were criminals, right?

Were they allowed due process, if not, how do we know?

 

[berg80]

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

This isnt a life, liberty, or property issue

Its about green cards for criminals and safety for innocent American citizens

You think because "green cards" weren't mentioned in the text of the amendments, because they didn't exist, they don't apply? That's really lame.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

What are they deprived of when they're deported?

.

American health care, welfare checks, housing, food, education, and plenty of victims for their savagery.


.

 

[berg80]

Does Murphy (or @berg80) realize how lame that sounds?

"I coulda kicked his ass . . . but I'm a peaceful man."

How could a low-level judge force the government to bring violent criminals who jumped the border back to the United States?

All the dismissive references to "low level judges" in the world do not take away their authority to have their court orders followed until such time as an appeal blocks them.

 

[80zephyr]

Your false analogy to what trump has done is pathetically inept.

And yet, still true.

 

[80zephyr]

Were they allowed due process, if not, how do we know?

All were convicted criminals.