This is why there’s been so much extreme rainfall and flooding in the U.S.

[BULLDOG]

Let see if you can notice a visual difference. Numbers are clearly not your thing. That's why you are a Democrat...


This is Alaska, covered head to toe with trees, grass, and wildlife, ice on mountains but nothing resembling mile thick ice with 130k years of ice core data that doesn't even get halfway down...

And this is Greenland, a continent specific ice age covered head to toe with ice age glacier, that started 1-2 million years ago at the northern top, and only in 1400s did it penetrate the southern tip and force the Vikings off the southern tip... Vikings who named it GREENland because the southern tip was ALL GREEN when they first settled it... but is now buried under 600 years of ice layers...

Every piece of land on Earth within 600 miles of an Earth Pole is in CONTINENT SPECIFIC ICE AGE, and every piece of land outside of 600 miles to a pole is not...

What a weird "coincidence" never noticed by the "top climate scientists..."





And as for "exposure to ocean warmth" and "elevation inland," this is what baby ice age has done to Greenland...

• 
  
• 
  

There does seem to be a visual difference in those pictures. However I won't pretend to know why those differences occurred. In case I haven't mentioned it heretofore, not having training in such things, I'll have to rely on the majority of experts. I know better than to read a couple of web sites, and then cite mine as an equivalent opinion to those that do know the answers.

 

[Robert W]

There does seem to be a visual difference in those pictures. However I won't pretend to know why those differences occurred. In case I haven't mentioned it heretofore, not having training in such things, I'll have to rely on the majority of experts. I know better than to read a couple of web sites, and then cite mine as an equivalent opinion to those that do know the answers.

Why not watch Judith Curry's video. She is an excellent teacher about climate.

 

[BULLDOG]

Why not watch Judith Curry's video. She is an excellent teacher about climate.

I don't have the time or the interest to become a climate scientist.

 

[Robert W]

I don't have the time or the interest to become a climate scientist.

5 minutes is all it takes for her to give you the essentials.

 

[BULLDOG]

5 minutes is all it takes for her to give you the essentials.

So a 5 minute video will teach me as much as the years that experts have invested in their field? I think I have figured out why so many crazies think they know more than the experts.

 

[Sunsettommy]

So a 5 minute video will teach me as much as the years that experts have invested in their field? I think I have figured out why so many crazies think they know more than the experts.

HA HA HA HA HA you must have posted at least 25 times in this thread already yet you can't watch a 5 video from a Scientist with over 100 published paper who held a famous chair at the university.

It is called a PRIMER which is a starting point for learning and getting it from Dr. Curry who is a reliable teacher on the subject.

You are constantly trying to avoid learning anything that is why you are a fool and remain ignorant of the subject.

 

[EMH]

There does seem to be a visual difference in those pictures. However I won't pretend to know why those differences occurred. In case I haven't mentioned it heretofore, not having training in such things, I'll have to rely on the majority of experts. I know better than to read a couple of web sites, and then cite mine as an equivalent opinion to those that do know the answers.

The link explains it perfectly, and also documents that Earth's ice content has NOTHING TO DO with CO2.

Greenland has 7% of Earth ice, 700k cubic miles.

How much is on Alaska?


Hint - 3rd place behind AA and G-land is Ellesmere with 0.3%

 

[ding]

Because I recognize that the majority of experts disagree with you.

They disagree with the empirical climate evidence of the geologic record?

Or is it that they disagree with the theoretical instantaneous GHG effect of CO2 is 1C per doubling of CO2?

 

[ding]

see 125

The fact that you can’t state your credentials as I have stated mine tells me you are ashamed of your credentials.

 

[ding]

Okey Dokey.
Seem you've been trying to do that for the last little bit.

Trying? Or doing?

 

[ding]

Not like Ebola, but I'm not arrogant enough to pretend I know better than the vast majority of the world's top experts. You don't seem to have that limitation.

Arrogance has nothing to do with it. This is about your blind acceptance of something you have made no effort to understand.

The weird thing is that you think everyone should blindly accept it.

 

[ding]

Soooo__ You gonna call me out, or are you just another prick tease?

I’m going to bend you over.

 

[ReinyDays]

He just told you.

He follows the experts. You know, people with actual education and experience and published science in the relevant scientific fields.

Journalists? ... neither of you are reading the scientific media ... far too technical for either of your educational level ... you both get your information from commercial media, written by journalists ... you know ... English majors hahahahahaha ...

Why do YOU think 1ºC changes weather? ... and what are your credentials to even comment on this subject? ... how are you incorporating the pseudo-adiabatic processes here? ...

BULLDOG already admitted to being functionally ignorant in this subject ...

 

[ReinyDays]

Sorry. I'm not limited by the "if it doesn't agree with MAGA, it' not real" meme

So ... you again admit to being clueless to the subject material ...

I don't know about MAGA ... I'm on hydro-power here, you know, protecting the environment ... here's an easier question for you, how much coal do you burn to post the dangers of burning coal on the internet ... just how much of a hypocrite are you? ...

 

[Papageorgio]

MSN

While there are varying meteorological forces behind this month’s extreme rainfall, what has connected them all is significant amounts of atmospheric moisture pulsing above the country.

It is flowing from abnormally warm oceans across the Northern Hemisphere that are likely to stretch elevated flood risks into August, data shows — perhaps into record territory. The conditions are allowing plumes of tropical moisture to stretch into middle latitudes and stagnate there, sending flood risks surging and exemplifying a critical consequence of rising global temperatures that researchers have been predicting and tracking for decades.

Scientist have been warning for decades about climate change. As oceans warm, the added moisture in the atmosphere will lead to more super storms. The repub party has called it lies and propped up their "experts" to refute the science. We can expect to see extreme weather episodes going forward and that will lead to more loss of life and property. Insurance rates are already skyrocketing in parts of the country where these weather extremes are prevalent. We may be too late to change course.

Climate has been changing since the world was created. Now thing new.

 

[ReinyDays]

HA HA HA HA HA you must have posted at least 25 times in this thread already yet you can't watch a 5 video from a Scientist with over 100 published paper who held a famous chair at the university.

It is called a PRIMER which is a starting point for learning and getting it from Dr. Curry who is a reliable teacher on the subject.

You are constantly trying to avoid learning anything that is why you are a fool and remain ignorant of the subject.

Anti-learning ... must be a Democrat ... at least Republicans have the excuse they can't learn ...

 

[Robert W]

Cool. You can add her name to the other two mentioned earlier. That make the score several hundred thousand to three.

You bought into the nonsense. There are not even close to that number you claim to follow.

 

[Robert W]

So a 5 minute video will teach me as much as the years that experts have invested in their field? I think I have figured out why so many crazies think they know more than the experts.

There are nearly no funds for any scientist who does not toe the political line. Scientists normally are not politicians, and it is not climate experts you believe, it is democrat politicians. You stopped learning a long time ago, I know since you have rejected learning from actual climate experts and rely on politicians.

 

[BULLDOG]

The link explains it perfectly, and also documents that Earth's ice content has NOTHING TO DO with CO2.

Greenland has 7% of Earth ice, 700k cubic miles.

How much is on Alaska?


Hint - 3rd place behind AA and G-land is Ellesmere with 0.3%

That's nice.

 

[BULLDOG]

They disagree with the empirical climate evidence of the geologic record?

Or is it that they disagree with the theoretical instantaneous GHG effect of CO2 is 1C per doubling of CO2?

No idea which. You'll have to ask them why they disagree. They disagree. That's enough.