toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
- Apr 29, 2017
- 98,387
- 104,273
- 3,615
1) No, he was addressing the issue.
Too bad. You mean more lip-service, more political theater. We were hoping he'd actually address the problem. I guess neither he nor you can ever say what the problem really is, all you see is an excuse to justify banning your object of fear: guns. You live in the fantasy made-up world of imagination where if just nobody had guns, then no one could kill themselves, and if they can't shoot each other, then everyone will get along and be happy.
So what better and easier place to begin but by disarming the people who are the TARGET of crime first.
