Australian PM proposes tougher national gun laws after mass shooting in Sydney

Banning guns is not the answer...

This is


1766787175779.webp
 
If the guns the alleged killers used had been banned they wouldn't have been able to do what they did.


Don't agree. They could have used knives, machetes...or a vehicle ramming attack against innocent people....the possibilities are endless sadly.

Albanese is a POS and everybody knows that by now.
 
Naveed Akram and his father also used IEDs to attack the annual ewish event and they began their attack by throwing four improvised explosive devices. They would have killed as many Jews as possible without guns. Prior to the attack, Naveed Akram was linked to IS and they went to the Philippines to receive military training. But Aussie police missed all the warning signs and let them slip through the safety net. IS supporters should be imprisoned for terrorism offenses as a precautionary measure as it has been done in Europe. But the current Aussie government is so afraid to offend Muslims that it does not go after Islamists.



Police described the devices as three aluminum pipe bombs and a tennis ball bomb containing an explosive, gunpowder and steel ball bearings. None detonated, but police described them as "viable" IEDs.

The pair had rented a room in the Sydney suburb of Campsie for three weeks before they left at 2:16 a.m. on the day of the attack. CCTV recorded them carrying what police allege were two shotguns, a rifle, five IEDs and two homemade Islamic State group flags wrapped in blankets.

Police said a video found on Naveed Akram's phone shows him with his father expressing "their political and religious views and appear to summarise their justification for the Bondi terrorist attack."

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom