This is what a rational reaction looks like.

You thirst for a government that forbids the ownership of firearms so they have complete and total control over you.

He thinks that when liberals have total control he won't be standing in line for bread before he goes home to his one light bulb apartment with the rest of us because he's been such a supporter of Mother government.
 
You are the lover of tyranny.
You thirst for a government that forbids the ownership of firearms so they have complete and total control over you.
Yeah, but our PM can't pardon convicted felons. Can't make executive orders on a whim. And if there was a tiny, eeny weeny sniff/hint of him being retaliatory towards his political enemies, he'd be out on his arse.

I'm no fan of govt, but I believe our form of it is not only better, but superior to yours. Now, when I say this, I mean in practical terms. On paper, I like sound of a constitutional republic. But the way you guys run it? It's a shit show and a joke.
 
You're an ally. If $h!t goes south there you'll be screaming for America like the rest of the world always does.
You mean like when you came to Britain's rescue in WWII? In Sept 1939....oh, wait that's right, you joined in after the UK had won the Battle of Britain...thanks anyway. Your country's help was appreciated. (bold and italicised, just remind you that it wasn't YOU who did shit, but your ancestors. Current Americans - especially right-wing loons - think they had something do to with winning WWII, when they did nothing. Most of you weren't even alive).
 
1) Have a nice day!
You too.
2) I don't care that you don't care.
Cool. And I don't care that you don't care that I don't care.
3) Yeah, I'm gonna spend my life worrying about an event that's happened twice in 30 years. I mean, you guys average 400 of these things every year. That's more than one a day, so maybe I get it. Seems like you're in a never ending spiral.
If you eliminate certain elements of our society, the shootings drop to about zero. I'm not willing to turn my guns in to placate those who allow certain elements to act like murderous animals.
4) I have infinitely more trust in my govt (some of the time) than I do in yours.
I have zero faith in yours. You continue to allow mass immigration that's going to destroy your country.
 
You mean like when you came to Britain's rescue in WWII? In Sept 1939....oh, wait that's right, you joined in after the UK had won the Battle of Britain...thanks anyway. Your country's help was appreciated. (bold and italicised, just remind you that it wasn't YOU who did shit, but your ancestors. Current Americans - especially right-wing loons - think they had something do to with winning WWII, when they did nothing. Most of you weren't even alive).
It's nice to see the complete lack of gratitude for what America has done for the world. It proves what unworthy pieces of shit you all are.
 
Yeah, but our PM can't pardon convicted felons. Can't make executive orders on a whim. And if there was a tiny, eeny weeny sniff/hint of him being retaliatory towards his political enemies, he'd be out on his arse.

I'm no fan of govt, but I believe our form of it is not only better, but superior to yours. Now, when I say this, I mean in practical terms. On paper, I like sound of a constitutional republic. But the way you guys run it? It's a shit show and a joke.
Does your PM even have a penis?
He's such a wimp I wonder.
How much lower can he bow to radical Islamic immigrants?
 
He thinks that when liberals have total control he won't be standing in line for bread before he goes home to his one light bulb apartment with the rest of us because he's been such a supporter of Mother government.
Their way of thinking is completely foreign to me. It's sick and irrational.
 

This is what a rational reaction looks like. Australia Doubles Down on Gun Control After Mass Shooting​


No, this is what you call just another failed leftist knee-jerking. In a time of confirmed, heightened public danger, he is only cracking down on people's ability to defend themselves, making them more vulnerable to attack, crime will go up, while the attackers are well-armed and don't give a hoot about obeying any laws.

Or they will simply switch from using guns to using something else.

The PM completely fails to address the real issue at stake here.
 
Here's a better reaction. Each citizen is required to carry a weapon for self protection. The moment a bad guy pulls his gun, he's met with a barrage of citizen fire power. Stop being sheeple on the way to slaughter. Be lions.
In my state we have open carry. People are armed at the grocery store. McDonalds is full of people wearing side arms in holsters. If we had a shooter, at all, anywhere, he or she would not make it three feet.
 
You too.

Cool. And I don't care that you don't care that I don't care.

If you eliminate certain elements of our society, the shootings drop to about zero. I'm not willing to turn my guns in to placate those who allow certain elements to act like murderous animals.

I have zero faith in yours. You continue to allow mass immigration that's going to destroy your country.
BS. Eliminate certain elements? Most mass shootings are carried out by disaffected young white men.
 
It's nice to see the complete lack of gratitude for what America has done for the world. It proves what unworthy pieces of shit you all are.
Obviously being a Deplorable, like your Dear Leader, you have terrible reading comprehension issues. I stated that the UK was/is grateful. However, the likes of you and other keyboard warriors don't get to stand on the shoulders of giants pretending you had anything to do with it. You didn't. Just in the same way NZ and Australia send troops to Europe and the Pacific during WWII when it wasn't our war either, I don't go around bragging about a war I had nothing to do with. I mean, you doing it is of no surprise. Being a Trumpie acolyte, he leads by example - lying all the time, taking credit for things he didn't do, and basically shitting on anyone around him (friend or foe).
 
15th post
Does your PM even have a penis?
He's such a wimp I wonder.
How much lower can he bow to radical Islamic immigrants?
Albo is okay. I didn't vote for him. Then again, the piece of foreskin that got removed when he was circumcised shows more sign of life than the blithering idiot in the WH at the moment. So, who are you to judge?
There are radicals all over the place. There are 3 per cent Muslims in Australia. About 0.0000001 per cent are radicalised. Hardly an issue. That being said, I don't think Islam is compatible with Western culture, so am perplexed why they want to come in the first place.
 
No, this is what you call just another failed leftist knee-jerking. In a time of confirmed, heightened public danger, he is only cracking down on people's ability to defend themselves, making them more vulnerable to attack, crime will go up, while the attackers are well-armed and don't give a hoot about obeying any laws.

Or they will simply switch from using guns to using something else.

The PM completely fails to address the real issue at stake here.
He is addressing the issue. He is getting guns off the street and the vast majority of Australians are more than happy about it.
 
He is addressing the issue.
He is utterly ignoring the issue, same way that he did in allowing the issue to develop, instead, projecting a media fantasy and a lie just like a good, leftwing dhimmi politician.

He is getting guns off the street
Only good guns not involved in crime people needed for protection, just so they can write down numbers in books for people like you to announce as "progress."

and the vast majority of Australians are more than happy about it.
Maybe happy with what they are first TOLD, which they are told to try to MAKE them happy--- until the next, maybe bigger murder spree comes along.

Then they can announce they need yet MORE gun control--- they just didn't do enough the first time.

Finally, once the populous has been utterly and completely disarmed and made helpless as sheep, criminals can run fully amok without fear of reprisal upon society knowing that no one can even shoot back in self-defense, as politicians swoon in progressive nirvana.
 
He is utterly ignoring the issue, same way that he did in allowing the issue to develop, instead, projecting a media fantasy and a lie just like a good, leftwing dhimmi politician.


Only good guns not involved in crime people needed for protection, just so they can write down numbers in books for people like you to announce as "progress."


Maybe happy with what they are first TOLD, which they are told to try to MAKE them happy--- until the next, maybe bigger murder spree comes along.

Then they can announce they need yet MORE gun control--- they just didn't do enough the first time.

Finally, once the populous has been utterly and completely disarmed and made helpless as sheep, criminals can run fully amok without fear of reprisal upon society knowing that no one can even shoot back in self-defense, as politicians swoon in progressive nirvana.
1) No, he was addressing the issue.
2) Meh, he's getting guns off the streets and not only does it make it harder for crims to get them, but easier for the police to trace them.
3) As I said, two sprees in 30 years. Those odds are better than more than 1 day stateside.
4) Meh, with regards to criminals. They are not running amok now. The ban was enacted in the 1990s. This from the stats dept:
  • Overall Crime: A dominant trend since the mid-1990s has been a significant decrease in many major crime categories, including homicide, burglary, and motor vehicle theft.
Although it does say sexual assaults are slightly up, but that is thought be because since the Me Too movement, women are reporting them more.

Bottom line is, your post is just rhetoric, with nothing much to back it up.
 
Back
Top Bottom