By most standards it is not "normal". That is correct. Now, why "normal" is so appealing remains to be seen.
Betsy DeVos looked very put together and normal. But her qualifications to be the Education Secretary were nonexistent. And she lived up to those qualifications.
If the person can do the job well, why do we care if they are "normal"?
Please explain how how Rachel Levine is anywhere near qualified for the job, and how he's fulfilling those qualifications. He has already evaded the question of whether or not he supports both allowing minors to be given hormone blockers to prevent them from going through puberty, as well as surgical destruction of a minor’s genitalia.
His record of public service was also horrible: Allowing “stable” coronavirus patients to be returned to nursing homes during the pandemic, receiving blame for the virus skyrocketing among the elderly in those facilities.
Levine was also called out for moving his own mother out of a nursing home facility despite the department’s guidance to admit “stable” patients who had contracted the virus.
This doesn't seem like the type of person I'd want for the job.
Those are reasons for concern. I don't know the answers. But at least they are questions concerning job performance, not questions of whether they are "normal".
One would think the Biden administration as well as the nominee would at least attempt to put on an aura of respectability, normalcy, and trust. Instead of flaunting this person in the face of those Americans who are appalled and turning it into a circus freak show.
You know damned well the Democrats don't give a crap whether he's qualified or not. They approve based solely on the identity of the nominee, and the fact that he flies in the face of everything considered normal, natural, and honest.
The Biden administration has turned out to be nothing but a complete clown show, from day one. And I am not entertained by their antics, more rather disgusted. And that's exactly what they want.