There Is No Constitutional Right to Satanism

[Delldude]

Nope, we can discriminate against Satanism while allowing legitimate religions like Christianity.

If you discriminate against Satanism, you'd be discriminating against the Democratic party.

 

[Dr.Destructo]

If you discriminate against Satanism, you'd be discriminating against the Democratic party.

LOL

Satan won't have anything to do with them.
Democrats and their leftist Karens are TOO evil for old Lucifer Morningstar.

 

[frigidweirdo]

There is No Constitutional Right to Satanism

Conservatives have been so shaped by libertarian arguments that they wonder whether Satanism is protected by the Constitution.

www.theamericanconservative.com

Despite people arguing that Satanism is protected by the 1st Amendment. One can actually argue that there is no Constitutional right to Satanism:

There is very little case law on the specific issue of whether Satanism is a protected religion, and what we do have is a bit jumbled. An illustrative case from the mid-1990s from the federal court in the Northern District of Ohio, while not binding precedent, is an excellent summary of how confused American constitutional law has become regarding religion.

We could also argue there isn't one for Christianity either.

Who gets to decide what a religion is?

 

[Delldude]

Who gets to decide what a religion is?

Climate change scientists.

 

[Dr.Destructo]

We could also argue there isn't one for Christianity either.

Who gets to decide what a religion is?

Merriam-Webster Dictionary

 

[dblack]

.Who gets to decide what a religion is?

Indeed. And the whole point of the First amendment is that it shouldn't be government.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Merriam-Webster Dictionary

View attachment 1155278

Okay, and?

 

[Jarlaxle]

Climate change scientists.

No, that's a cult.

 

[Delldude]

No, that's a cult.

The new religion of the Marxist socialists.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

There is No Constitutional Right to Satanism

Conservatives have been so shaped by libertarian arguments that they wonder whether Satanism is protected by the Constitution.

www.theamericanconservative.com

Despite people arguing that Satanism is protected by the 1st Amendment. One can actually argue that there is no Constitutional right to Satanism:

There is very little case law on the specific issue of whether Satanism is a protected religion, and what we do have is a bit jumbled. An illustrative case from the mid-1990s from the federal court in the Northern District of Ohio, while not binding precedent, is an excellent summary of how confused American constitutional law has become regarding religion.

Buddhism is categorized among the major religions, yet it has nothing to do with a deity. People bring their particular religion into it, but technically, there is no deity involved.

 

[cnm]

Nope, we can discriminate against Satanism while allowing legitimate religions like Christianity.

Must be a Constitutional scholar, fer shur...

 

[cnm]

No, that's a cult.

What religion isn't?

cult noun 1 a a system of religious belief; b the sect of people following such a system. 2 a an unorthodox or false religion; b the people adhering to such a system. 3 an especially extravagant admiration for a person, idea, etc. 4 something which is popular and regarded as particularly significant by a certain group of people: a fashion, craze or fad. cultic or cultish adj. cultism noun. cultist noun. ​

ETYMOLOGY: 17c: from Latin cultus worship, from colere to cultivate.​

 

[cnm]

Doesn't matter. The founders didn't have in mind slaves when they drafted the Bill of Rights.

 

[cnm]

From what I know, Islam meets the criteria of a legitimate religion. Satanism does not.

It's good to have an objective opinion, finally.

 

[cnm]

And what's the difference between a religious war and an ideological war, such as the Civil War or WWII?

Firing on a fortress?

 

[cnm]

The Civil War was fought to preserve the union.
WW II was fought to repel Fascism.
Religious wars are just a bunch of primitive, delusional kooks killing each other over who has the best imaginary friend.

I am amazed to think people imagine wars are fought over other things than resources.

 

[cnm]

WWII really wasn't ideological vis a vis america anyway as we tried to stay out of it as best we could until we were attacked.

Only then was fascism repelled, eh?

 

[schmidlap]

No. No, retarded commie Satanist ******.
The Founding Fathers had in mind only different denominations of the Christian religion when all the things were written.
Religion means of God. Not Allah, and not Beelzebub, *****!

The Founding Fathers made no mention of any gods in the Constitution, and John Adams was quite clear regarding the Christian one:

"The Government of the United States of America Is Not, in Any Sense, Founded on the Christian Religion.''​

 

[Papageorgio]

There is No Constitutional Right to Satanism

Conservatives have been so shaped by libertarian arguments that they wonder whether Satanism is protected by the Constitution.

www.theamericanconservative.com

Despite people arguing that Satanism is protected by the 1st Amendment. One can actually argue that there is no Constitutional right to Satanism:

There is very little case law on the specific issue of whether Satanism is a protected religion, and what we do have is a bit jumbled. An illustrative case from the mid-1990s from the federal court in the Northern District of Ohio, while not binding precedent, is an excellent summary of how confused American constitutional law has become regarding religion.

It is as constitutional as Christianity.

 

[Delldude]

The Founding Fathers made no mention of any gods in the Constitution, and John Adams was quite clear regarding the Christian one:

"The Government of the United States of America Is Not, in Any Sense, Founded on the Christian Religion.''​

'Natures God'......