The woman Behind The Notorious LibsofTikTok Account Has Been Unmasked And Conservatives Are Furious

[skews13]

The "Libs of TikTok" account posted video of a woman teach sexual education to children in Kentucky, branding the woman a "predator," and the same clip appeared the next night on Laura Ingraham’s Fox News program, and its tweets reach millions of social media users and helps set the agenda in right-wing discourse online -- but the Washington Post has tracked down and identified the account's owner.

The account was created in early November 2020 by Brooklyn real estate agent Chaya Raichik, who cycled through Twitter handles and areas of interest -

Conservatives quickly lashed out at The Washington Post for publishing Raichik's name.The Washington Post 'exposed' @libsoftiktok for what crime exactly? For the sin of showing America exactly what leftists have in store for their children. If you're effective and anonymous, you can expect to be doxxed. It's a last-ditch effort to intimidate you into silence," addedBreitbart reporter Alana Mastrangelo.

The woman behind the notorious 'Libs of TikTok' account was just unmasked â and conservatives are furious

An anonymous Twitter account that has helped drive the recent spike in anti-LGBTQ crackdowns and possibly was present at the Jan. 6 insurrection has been unmasked.The "Libs of TikTok" account posted video of a woman teaching sexual education to children in Kentucky, branding the woman a...

www.rawstory.com

If she thinks her cause is so righteous, what’s she afraid of? You wanted fame and fortune sweetheart? You got it.

 

[martybegan]

The "Libs of TikTok" account posted video of a woman teach sexual education to children in Kentucky, branding the woman a "predator," and the same clip appeared the next night on Laura Ingraham’s Fox News program, and its tweets reach millions of social media users and helps set the agenda in right-wing discourse online -- but the Washington Post has tracked down and identified the account's owner.

The account was created in early November 2020 by Brooklyn real estate agent Chaya Raichik, who cycled through Twitter handles and areas of interest -

Conservatives quickly lashed out at The Washington Post for publishing Raichik's name.The Washington Post 'exposed' @libsoftiktok for what crime exactly? For the sin of showing America exactly what leftists have in store for their children. If you're effective and anonymous, you can expect to be doxxed. It's a last-ditch effort to intimidate you into silence," addedBreitbart reporter Alana Mastrangelo.

The woman behind the notorious 'Libs of TikTok' account was just unmasked â and conservatives are furious

An anonymous Twitter account that has helped drive the recent spike in anti-LGBTQ crackdowns and possibly was present at the Jan. 6 insurrection has been unmasked.The "Libs of TikTok" account posted video of a woman teaching sexual education to children in Kentucky, branding the woman a...

www.rawstory.com

If she thinks her cause is so righteous, what’s she afraid of? You wanted fame and fortune sweetheart? You got it.

She's afraid of idiots like you trying to ruin her.

All she does is post OTHER PEOPLE'S CONTENT with some occasional snarky remark added.

How is using people's own posts as evidence of their views hateful?

 

[Rambunctious]

Lets talk about what she is saying....that unfortunately we will never see from the left today...an actual honest live open debate on the issues available for the world to see....

 

[Calypso Jones]

The left...always defending what prefers to lie hidden in darkness.

 

[Rambunctious]

Grooming children on sex that do not belong to you is evil....

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

She's afraid of idiots like you trying to ruin her.

All she does is post OTHER PEOPLE'S CONTENT with some occasional snarky remark added.

How is using people's own posts as evidence of their views hateful?

Fame is a sharp, double-edged sword.
She's had her 15 minutes..and it's likely going to cost her.
For some reason, people seem to believe that there are no consequences for their right to "free" speech.

 

[martybegan]

Fame is a sharp, double-edged sword.
She's had her 15 minutes..and it's likely going to cost her.
For some reason, people seem to believe that there are no consequences for their right to "free" speech.

Why should there be "consequences" for re-posting the content of people and making snarky comments about it?

So basically you are supporting mob enforced thoughtcrime punishment, got it.

Are you so unsure of your own views that anyone countering them has to be destroyed?

 

[1srelluc]

Doxxing is a dem tactic used when they have nothing else to counter a argument......I'm sure the shit-for-brains dem minion useful idiots will be all over her.....She should arm herself.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

The "Libs of TikTok" account posted video of a woman teach sexual education to children in Kentucky, branding the woman a "predator," and the same clip appeared the next night on Laura Ingraham’s Fox News program, and its tweets reach millions of social media users and helps set the agenda in right-wing discourse online -- but the Washington Post has tracked down and identified the account's owner.

The account was created in early November 2020 by Brooklyn real estate agent Chaya Raichik, who cycled through Twitter handles and areas of interest -

Conservatives quickly lashed out at The Washington Post for publishing Raichik's name.The Washington Post 'exposed' @libsoftiktok for what crime exactly? For the sin of showing America exactly what leftists have in store for their children. If you're effective and anonymous, you can expect to be doxxed. It's a last-ditch effort to intimidate you into silence," addedBreitbart reporter Alana Mastrangelo.

The woman behind the notorious 'Libs of TikTok' account was just unmasked â and conservatives are furious

An anonymous Twitter account that has helped drive the recent spike in anti-LGBTQ crackdowns and possibly was present at the Jan. 6 insurrection has been unmasked.The "Libs of TikTok" account posted video of a woman teaching sexual education to children in Kentucky, branding the woman a...

www.rawstory.com

If she thinks her cause is so righteous, what’s she afraid of? You wanted fame and fortune sweetheart? You got it.

She posted "YOUR" videos on Twitter. Why are you ashamed/embarrassed????

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Why should there be "consequences" for re-posting the content of people and making snarky comments about it?

So basically you are supporting mob enforced thoughtcrime punishment, got it.

Are you so unsure of your own views that anyone countering them has to be destroyed?

What she did isn't a "countering" view. It's retweeting unsubstantiated bullshit.
She has the right to. But that does not mean there aren't consequences for it.
If there are, you put yourself out there because you wanted the notoriety.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

What she did isn't a "countering" view. It's retweeting unsubstantiated bullshit.
She has the right to. But that does not mean there aren't consequences for it.
If there are, you put yourself out there because you wanted the notoriety.

No, she's posting liberal tiktokers own videos. They're embarrassed by this

 

[martybegan]

What she did isn't a "countering" view. It's retweeting unsubstantiated bullshit.
She has the right to. But that does not mean there aren't consequences for it.
If there are, you put yourself out there because you wanted the notoriety.

it's re-tweeting other people's content. Are you really going with the whole "don't believe people when they actually give their views and opinions" bullshit?

Again, why does there have to be consequences for something like this? Are your ilk so fragile they can't handle being countered or questioned?

We already know the answer to that, snowflake.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The "Libs of TikTok" account posted video of a woman teach sexual education to children in Kentucky, branding the woman a "predator," and the same clip appeared the next night on Laura Ingraham’s Fox News program, and its tweets reach millions of social media users and helps set the agenda in right-wing discourse online -- but the Washington Post has tracked down and identified the account's owner.

The account was created in early November 2020 by Brooklyn real estate agent Chaya Raichik, who cycled through Twitter handles and areas of interest -

Conservatives quickly lashed out at The Washington Post for publishing Raichik's name.The Washington Post 'exposed' @libsoftiktok for what crime exactly? For the sin of showing America exactly what leftists have in store for their children. If you're effective and anonymous, you can expect to be doxxed. It's a last-ditch effort to intimidate you into silence," addedBreitbart reporter Alana Mastrangelo.

The woman behind the notorious 'Libs of TikTok' account was just unmasked â and conservatives are furious

An anonymous Twitter account that has helped drive the recent spike in anti-LGBTQ crackdowns and possibly was present at the Jan. 6 insurrection has been unmasked.The "Libs of TikTok" account posted video of a woman teaching sexual education to children in Kentucky, branding the woman a...

www.rawstory.com

If she thinks her cause is so righteous, what’s she afraid of? You wanted fame and fortune sweetheart? You got it.

hey skewey?....are you and elmer related?....hey just wondering...

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

it's re-tweeting other people's content. Are you really going with the whole "don't believe people when they actually give their views and opinions" bullshit?

Again, why does there have to be consequences for something like this? Are your ilk so fragile they can't handle being countered or questioned?

We already know the answer to that, snowflake.

Again, the double edged sword of misinformation cuts both ways. You want your 15 minutes? Sorry, there's no law that says there are no consequences to your use of speech. Let's face it, it's not about "countering" or "questioning". It's about your perceived right to continue to spout conspiracy theories and division pimping without being saddled with having to prove your ridiculous assertions. Used to be in this country, you had to have proof of your accusations before you opened your mouth...or typed a character on your keyboard.

But, you don't really care about accuracy or honesty do you?
Long Live the Alt-Right! So just, so righteous. Stories that must be told!

 

[Confederate Soldier]

So doxing people is okay. Wow.

 

[martybegan]

Again, the double edged sword of misinformation cuts both ways. You want your 15 minutes? Sorry, there's no law that says there are no consequences to your use of speech. Let's face it, it's not about "countering" or "questioning". It's about your perceived right to continue to spout conspiracy theories and division pimping without being saddled with having to prove your ridiculous assertions. Used to be in this country, you had to have proof of your accusations before you opened your mouth...or typed a character on your keyboard.

But, you don't really care about accuracy or honesty do you?
Long Live the Alt-Right! So just, so righteous. Stories that must be told!

You keep running to the law and ignore the sheer amount of hubris shown by your side that thinks anyone that thinks differently from them needs to be destroyed. And again, she's only posting things from people ON YOUR FUCKING SIDE.

So you are saying the people she are quoting aren't just following the typical SJW mantras?

The rest of your post is just admitting you don't have a leg to stand on in regards to this.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

You keep running to the law and ignore the sheer amount of hubris shown by your side that thinks anyone that thinks differently from them needs to be destroyed. And again, she's only posting things from people ON YOUR FUCKING SIDE.

So you are saying the people she are quoting aren't just following the typical SJW mantras?

The rest of your post is just admitting you don't have a leg to stand on in regards to this.

What hubris are you referring to? She is retweeting and re-posting heavily edited alt-right opinion, misinformation, and conspiracy theories. Again, used to be you had to provide proof of your silly accusations before you posted it, verbal or otherwise.

I'm sorry. This woman is just spreading cancer. Consequences are the only way to get through to people like this.

 

[martybegan]

What hubris are you referring to? She is retweeting and re-posting heavily edited alt-right opinion, misinformation, and conspiracy theories. Again, used to be you had to provide proof of your silly accusations before you posted it, verbal or otherwise.

I'm sorry. This woman is just spreading cancer. Consequences are the only way to get through to people like this.

What editing? She links to the posters own accounts.

It's amazing the lengths your side will go through to stifle any views that aren't yours.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

What editing? She links to the posters own accounts.

It's amazing the lengths your side will go through to stifle any views that aren't yours.

And it's amazing what your side will go through to make sure your just and righteous division pimping goes on.
This woman got outed. Too bad.

The Teal Mango | Anything But Traditional

We’re a Digital Platform offering the Latest Updates and News from Entertainment, Technology, Lifestyle and Food Industry.

www.thetealmango.com

Again, used to be you had to have proof before you went spouting conspiracy theory laden bullshit.

 

[pknopp]

If you see it on TikTok obviously it is real.