Funny thing is, we're probably paying ISIS for the oil to fuel our aircraft for these aircraft missions that are supposedly bombing them. Which is a completely ineffective way to conduct any operation. This operation is really about Assad to begin with.
And Under the command(if you could ever call it that) of GWB.....how much did it cost ??????????Take your time Loser and let us all know
I'm not a partisan. I'll agree with you, this started under Bush. Both Kissinger and Brzezinski felt this was a wise move, but both foreign policy wonks on both sides work for the elites. I don't think interfering in other nations and peoples affairs is a wise move. See G. Washington's farewell address as to what is the best non-partisan course in foreign policy. There is this thing called "blow-back." Yeah, if you want to avoid that, get our troops out of other nations territory. It's as easy as that.
Globalists are globalists, they all meet at the CFR, and they are pretty non-partisan in their voting for military intervention. They like to blame each other when they don't "intervene" enough, or intervene too much. . . but none of them consider that it is using violence and getting involved in the first place all for these corporations to make more profit that is the cause of our woe.
Our media COULD ignore what is going on out there, and then we wouldn't have to be bothered. If no reporters where there to get beheaded? Then it wouldn't be an issue. Ancient ruins get destroyed by wars and natural disasters all the time. Millions get killed and displaced by foreign wars as well. IT IS NONE OF OUR BUSINESS. Why does the corporate press cover it though? Because Wall-street and the BANKS have a HUGE interest and a big profit motive in getting the people of this nation into a fight, and they OWN the press, duh. If you know about war, you know it is a racket. The rest, it's all just war propaganda. Every decade, each century, it's always the same, I don't care which party you are from.