Projection again. If he runs in '24, he WINS IN '24. People like you who claim he will institute violence are the very ones who will cheer on those on the Left that refuse to accept the victory and begin violence in the streets of the blue cesspools. You'll be saying they're justified because "Trump". Just be aware, Cletus, THIS time, we'll be fighting back.
Unfair sounds like the word of a safe space needing little cuck. Fair or unfair is a subjective distinction fucktard, I'm more interested in facts and its a fact that the Founders you worship as heroes were slavers and rapists.
Name one thing I said that was false you ignorant dipshit.
1. Okay, you can misuse words if that makes you feel more oppressed and inferior or whatever you're feeling. Without George Washington there would be no United States, we honor his sacrifice and that of all of the Founding Fathers and patriots, who pledged "their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor" . Who cares that they owned slaves? Everyone owned slaves back then, so what?
www.prodigalsonsofliberty.com
lol. Obviously calling your heroes slavers got you all in your feels. That's the point. Changing perspectives through rhetoric. Calling Washington a piece of shit slaver makes people stop and ask why and when I point out matter of factly that he was a slaver then one of three things can happen.
Lol. Even if that were true, that without Washington there would be no America, so what? There could very well be something better. There is literally no way to tell. Maybe the slaves that Washington oppressed and exploited would of had better lives.
I care, and the people who want to tear down the statues of rapist and slavers and the culture that idolizes them care.Who cares that they owned slaves? Everyone owned slaves back then, so what?
Founding Fathers Lost Fortunes, but Kept Their Honor
by Kenton Long Today is the 243rd anniversary of the Battle of Lexington and Concord, the first battles in our eight-year war with Britain we call the American Revolution or War for Independence. T…
Oh I can read just fine, like how I read you already admitting slavery was legal back then but you want to be pedantic because you can't deny that Washington and Jefferson were slavers, I get it, that's the best you got. Washington however did sign his name to the Constitution and Jefferson helped write it and Decleration of Independence which Founded this country, hence the term Founders. All our laws stem from Constitution including the ones regulating the importation of slaves in article 1 section 9, the famous 3/5s clause determing representation in the House in Article 1 section 2 and then there is article 4 section 2 that states "persons held to service" escaping from one state to another, remained in service. Even your heroes knew enough to be ashamed about slavery to not mention it by name. Lol.
Then you have nothing to worry about do you? Lol. I have to say though, I think in the long run, making the case that slavers and rapists are pieces of shit isn't that hard. I think the hard part is going to be trying to convince people that your heroes weren't pieces of shit.
Your children are overwhelmingly progressive and not down for celebrating old dead slavers either. Lol. You can brush off what's happening to Confederate idolatry but it wasn't that long ago to see Republican governors and Congressmen arguing on behalf of Confederate idolatry and now there is nothing but silence. Go ahead and ignore that cultural shift if you want to. In fact, we're counting on you being just as inept and out of touch with your defense of Founding slavers as you all were in your defense of piece of shit Confederates.
I never said forcibly raped and you can't quote one instance where I did. I called him a rapist because a 40 year old man having sex with a teenage girl is rape.
You think 14 year olds or slaves of any kind (who by definition are under duress) can give consent to 40 year old men for sex? That's some sick shit. Maybe keep that to yourself Epstein.
1. I give you credit for quick responses. You are relatively new to the message board, and I hope you stick with us for a long time. You have a unique perspective...that said....
mediaequalizer.com
Wrong. Just the turds (you and magaturds just like you) are being flushed, you uneducated dipshit.
So, what are your thoughts on the Trans Sahara slave trade? Don't know anything about it? Of course not. That's black on black crime. I keep forgetting your virtue signaling. You know, how you pretend to care about minorities and the down trodden but in actuality you don't? Or else we would see a virtue signaling hypocrite like you call out the oppression of people by the China government or the oppression of the people in Venzeula or Cuba. You know? Things going on today. Not something that ended in 1865 thanks to Republicans and American whites.
One can hope.
It was Jefferson's BROTHER. Younger brother, well-known to hell it up in the slave quarters and dance to the black music.
How am I being "flushed?"
That's a good find! Every other "history" link to Jefferson and Hemings had it as certain that Thomas Jefferson was the father. It leaves some doubt if nothing else.
www.historyonthenet.com
Yes, that. The genetic evidence has been known to be indefinite (could just as well have been Jefferson's brother) for decades now.That's a good find! Every other "history" link to Jefferson and Hemings had it as certain that Thomas Jefferson was the father. It leaves some doubt if nothing else.
"The scholars also noted that Jefferson’s overseer, Edmund Bacon, had not only flatly denied that Jefferson had fathered any of Sally Hemings’ children, but reported that he had seen a white man—not Thomas Jefferson—leave Hemings’ bedchamber many mornings before work. The scholars pointed to Jefferson’s brother, often called “Uncle Randolph,” as the probable father of Heming’s children. Randolph Jefferson was reported to have a social relationship with the Monticello slaves and had possibly fathered other children through his own servants."Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson: Myths and Facts
Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson. In 1802, James T. Callender published an editorial in the Richmond Recorder that claimed President Thomas Jefferson
lol. That's more like it. But I have to tell you, I like the framing of you racists calling us low-lifes while hero worshipping slavers. It really drives home how fucked up your value system is.
That's not how Democracy works cuck boy. We'll get em all eventually. As a demographic white racists are a growing minority and mixed race Americans the fastest growing demographic. That's just simple math.
I'm not trying to negate your respect dumbass. We're going to use your respect for slavers to paint you and your culture as deplorable pieces of shits just like we did Confederate culture.
A lot of good that's done you. Don't know if you've noticed but cancel culture has been kicking your ass. Lol. Look at BLM. When that came out you all tried your best to paint that as a terrorist organization and now it's mainstream. Your racist opposition helped propel it into an international brand and media influencer. There isn't a cultural issue you clowns haven't been man handled with from legal weed to gay marriage.
When you venerate slavers what you are saying is so what they raped and enslaved people, I like them anyway and that helps paint you as a piece of shit yourself, so thank you.
No that statement is stupid. Slavery and rape were as deplorable in the 1700s as they are today.
Speak for yourself. He earned your respect because you're the type of deplorable piece of shit that respects slavers.
That's my point. You're the type of deplorable piece of shit who's okay with slavers. I'm fine with being known as someone who hates slavers and fine with you being known as someone who respects them.
Adultry...lol. Is that what you think a decent counter is? OK cuck boy. You go ahead and run with that one. Lol.
Those just sound like excuses. The South refused to give up slavery so that's why Washington had to own some and why Jefferson raped one? Are they leaders or cucks who had no choice? You really need to decide on a logically consistent argument. Lol.
What do you mean by 2021 values? In 2021 Afghan leaders think it's okay to throw gays off buildings, Indian community leaders think gang rape is an acceptable punishment for daughters disrespecting their families, and China sees nothing wrong with putting Muslims in prison camps. People all over the world have different values now and had different values then. I'm not judging old dead slavers by 2021 values, I'm judging them by my values and my values are that slavery and rape were always deplorable. Now maybe your values are that slavery and rape at some point were perfectly acceptable practices, I'll take you at your word for that.
And? Do any of those facts make the argument that slavery and rape in 1700 weren't deplorable human practices?
You say fake but you can't actually point to one thing I said that isn't true. What we have here is a difference of opinion not facts. The Founding Father were slavers. That's a fact. I think slavers are pieces of shit and you think slavers are worthy of respect, those are subjective opinions. I'm perfectly comfortable with what my opinions say about me, you're the one trying to pretend I've misrepresented history because even you in heart of hearts knows that you should be ashamed of it.
Lol. I'm sure Confederate Idolaters felt the same way.
Maybe, but when later generations celebrate it, they will be celebrating American heroes like Tubman and MLK, people who fought for actual freedom rather than the freedom to profit off of slavery.
That's right. Defend raping teenagers, you really are making it hard for me to paint you as a deplorable piece of shit. Lol.
Its easier for cucks with weak arguments like you to have both sides of the conversation isn't it? Lol.
1. Its getting to the point that we really are moving from color-blind to racist. From antifa, to BLM, to flash mobs, to the kill zones that used to be safe cities, ******* animals. Whatever you think your "value system" is its not compatible with a civilized society. Just remember who pushed more racism.
www.historyonthenet.com
And yours is the sort of ignorant belief system that arises from venerating slavers. Nothing I said is incompatible with civilized society and in fact it's your hero Washington who as a slaver had a value system incompatible with today's society.
Again, your assclown of a party hasn't won the popular vote since 2004. You win elections because of the electoral college and gerrymandering not because your party receives more votes from actual people.
Our cancel culture canceled the Confederacy, don't worry, we'll get to your Founders eventually.
Lol. BLM is more popular now than its ever been. What you are witnessing isn't a cooling off but a repositioning of BLM as mainstream. Obviously a short sited and politically ignorant moron like you doesn't know how to analyze that so let me help you. When radical organizations push the culture one way and become mainstream that means what takes its place as radical is even more extreme than before. We are pushing this country so far to the left that what your party once called a terrorist organization now has corporate sponsorship. On the other hand organizations that you all start, like the Proud Boys are actually classified as terrorist organizations by other governments. Lol.
Lol. Sounds like you care quite a bit. Look at the pretzel of stupidity you twist yourself in here to try and pretend you don't venerate slavers.
Slavery was always deplorable fucktard, something doesn't become less deplorable just because its popular or legal. There are Muslim countries were its still legal to marry 10 year old girls, you think it's legality makes it less disgusting? Lol. What kind of sick **** are you?
Lol. I have no problem with you teaching your children to be historically ignorant. Teach them fairytales over reality all you want. Our culture is just going to leave your ignorant children behind.
No, I won't ignore that you and your culture venerate slavers. I'll use that disgusting hero worship to push your culture around and take your country from you. Lol.
I can impose my values all I want and expose yours for what they are. In fact that's what BLM did. Those who opposed it had to take the position that black lives didn't matter and that's a losing argument. Taking the position that it's fine to venerate slavers and pretend they believed in and fought for equality for all is a losing one because they didn't and they were slavers. We win because reality and morality are on our side.
You are free to adopt whatever value system you want cuck boy. If your value system is one that believes that at one time slavery and rape were OK then I'm cool with that. That's a useful example of the deplorable nature of your values. It's how we got the Confederates.
What scholars? That link you provided looks like it goes to someone's blog. There isn't even a byline on the article so you can know who wrote it. Lol.12. Long story short: I'm not ashamed of honoring the Founding Fathers, not even a tiny bit. I can overlook that they owned slaves, a common practice at that time.
The only history you may have misrepresented is that Thomas Jefferson raped Sally Hemings. It may have been Jefferson's brother.
"The scholars pointed to Jefferson’s brother, often called “Uncle Randolph,” as the probable father of Heming’s children."Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson: Myths and Facts
Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson. In 1802, James T. Callender published an editorial in the Richmond Recorder that claimed President Thomas Jefferson
Or course you would be the type of assclown that thinks fighting to preserve slavery was honorable. You're what we call a useful idiot. Lol.
1. You keep looking at "slavers" instead of Revolutionary War heroes. You keep trying to impose 2021 values on people from the 1700s. That's simply moronic. Slavery was perfectly legal in the 1700s. A fact you keep ignoring. We venerate and honor the Founding Fathers, so what?
1776-commission-report.com
I haven't ignored the fact that slavery was legal then. I'm actually using the fact that slavery was legal to point out how deplorable their culture was and how deplorable the culture that venerates them is. You're the idiot trying to make the case that morality and legality are synonymous when they clearly aren't.
Lol, I'm not whining about the electoral college. I'm making the point that you equating electoral victories to majority support is stupid and contrary to how our elections are decided. The true measure of majority support is through the popular vote and your party hasn't won that since 2004.
If you really wanted voters to decide how they want to live you'd support the popular vote.
That's exactly what I want you to say. So what as a response to why you hero worship slavers is great propaganda to use against you.
I don't believe legality and morality are the same thing but if you say you do then I guess you think Muslim societies that legally allow adult men to marry child brides are perfectly moral cultures. That is also useful propaganda to use against you and your culture.
I challenge you to name one thing I've misrepresented about the Founders.6. LOL! You can keep your "culture" in your urban plantations. Enjoy. As for "real history" instead of "fake history" try reading the "1776 Commission" report, written by real historians:
1776 Commission Report – Commissioned by the 45th President of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump
If morality is a matter of conscience and you are in possession of a conscience then the answer to your question of "who are we to judge" is you and everyone else with a conscience. My conscience tells me slavery and rape are morally reprehensible. Obviously yours tells you something different. I think most people in possession of a conscience agree with me, that rape and slavery are morally reprehensible. I also think most people are aware that the Founders were slavers. I think if I ask most people to put aside the fairytale hero worship and combine those two things that it becomes an inescapable fact that the Founders were morally reprehensible.
Lol. Why do you think my attitude sucks? In fact I will enthusiastically thank your ancestors for killing piece of shit Confederate whites who you said in your last post were honorable men. Lol. I have no problem with white on white violence that weakens your racist cultures and makes it easier to take your country from you. Do thank your dead relatives for me when you see them. Lol.
