Montrovant
Fuzzy bears!
It only seems questionable to you. Its been proven repeatedly over the years. You would know this if you were Black.They don’t seem to understand the concept of Precedent based on legal nomenclature.Given these dopes logic, If my great great great great grandfather were run over and killed by a train in 1857, I could sue for damages.
They don't care, they just want a check. Not a one could prove they were damaged in any way by slavery.
We can prove that we were damaged by slavery and on top of that we can add on continued actions after slavery until this day.
It seems questionable that you can prove you, personally, were damaged by slavery. There's certainly an argument for it, but objective proof seems like a stretch. The issues that remained or occurred after slavery, or that are around now, is a different issue.
If someone has to be black to know something, it hasn't been objectively proven.

Also, do you honestly think all blacks consider this something proven?