Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,511
- 2,250
Food, clothes, housing. Are you stupid?What does that have to do with slavery? The enslaved learned trades but didnt get paid for it not to mention the atrocities they had to endure.Every segment of society, at one time or another, was subject to rejection and abject poverty.They don’t seem to understand the concept of Precedent based on legal nomenclature.Based on?
You wouldn’t even get to a court room.
Precedent based on what wrong?
Given these dopes logic, If my great great great great grandfather were run over and killed by a train in 1857, I could sue for damages.
They don't care, they just want a check. Not a one could prove they were damaged in any way by slavery.
They learned a trade.
The issue is slavery, not renumeration.