The Trump Hypocrisy of a weaponized Judicial system!

We'll see . . .

Fact:

A grand jury, made up of more than a dozen voter civic-minded enough to volunteer to serve long term as guardrails to prevent unfair prosecutions, and hailing from the Blue State of Virginia (Commonwealth, if you will), decided two things:

1) there was enough evidence of Comey's crimes that a conviction in a criminal trial was likely,

and

2) that the alleged crimes were serious enough that they warranted such a trial.
I have at no time in this OP defended Comey or had him in the conversation
 
I have at no time in this OP defended Comey or had him in the conversation
You attacked the indictment of Comey as an example of the Trump lawfare this thread is about.

From your OP:
Trump has been saying for many years that the Democrats have weaponized the Justice system to attack him and the Republicans. Here below in the video, is him saying it again just 6 months ago and now with the James Comey indictment, he is going against the Democrats
You are losing the thread, in more ways than one.
 
Turnabout is fair play, eh?
The judicial system that let Trump walk on multiple felonies accross multiple states is under attack by that shitbag because his entire life has been devoted to destroying anyone who he thinks crossed him.

What a way to live. Too bad the entire country has to be subjected to this madman's antics.
 
The judicial system that let Trump walk on multiple felonies accross multiple states is under attack by that shitbag because his entire life has been devoted to destroying anyone who he thinks crossed him.

What a way to live. Too bad the entire country has to be subjected to this madman's antics.
Chimper lies.
 
You attacked the indictment of Comey as an example of the Trump lawfare this thread is about.

From your OP:

You are losing the thread, in more ways than one.
Yes, but choosing who the Attorney General should go after is not his job. I used Comey and the two others he specifically named, as an example of what he should be doing, no matter the proof there might be as to why they should be prosecuted.
 

Wait, wait.


You'll never learn from your mistakes unless you admit to them. You said, in post # 162:

I have at no time in this OP defended Comey or had him in the conversation
And I showed you that you had him in the conversation in the very first post of this OP:

Trump has been saying for many years that the Democrats have weaponized the Justice system to attack him and the Republicans. Here below in the video, is him saying it again just 6 months ago and now with the James Comey indictment, he is going against the Democrats
First paragraph of the first post, in fact.

Now, are you going to admit your error/lie, or not?

Tell me that, and then I'll address what you said below.

choosing who the Attorney General should go after is not his job. I used Comey and the two others he specifically named, as an example of what he should be doing, no matter the proof there might be as to why they should be prosecuted.
 
No. Turn about is idiotic and evil. It's like saying, "Well, my neighbor's been beating his wife for years - now it's MY turn!"
it's amazing the ease with which socially educated folk get so lost in an analogy. ^that^ is as misguided as any, the equivalent would be your neighbor's wife fighting back and then the socially educated saying to her and other women v-this-v
You sick *****.
 
it's amazing the ease with which socially educated folk get so lost in an analogy. ^that^ is as misguided as any, the equivalent would be your neighbor's wife fighting back and then the socially educated saying to her and other women v-this-v
No. You're lying. Buncha hypocritical ***** with NO principles NO ethics - just fear and petty revenge. That's the heart an soul of MAGA jackboot authoritarians. It's all you offer.
 
No. You're lying. Buncha hypocritical ***** with NO principles NO ethics - just fear and petty revenge. That's the heart an soul of MAGA jackboot authoritarians. It's all you offer.
^Just more socially educated content^...I'm a democrat, and you are not correcting what it is you pretend to be a lie in my post as it is spot on.
 
This discussion condences this thread very well:



The Democrat's point in this is that while there were political prosecutions under Biden, Biden himself was not directing them, as Trump is.

Well, duh!

Biden was not directing anything, the man was not even capable of signing his own name, much less knowing what was being signed for him.
 
Wait, wait.


You'll never learn from your mistakes unless you admit to them. You said, in post # 162:


And I showed you that you had him in the conversation in the very first post of this OP:


First paragraph of the first post, in fact.

Now, are you going to admit your error/lie, or not?

Tell me that, and then I'll address what you said below.
You are a total piece of biased shit.

The OP is about Trump going after political opponents using the judicial system.

It is not specifically about Comey or anyone else. It is generally what he is doing but in order to give the necessary EXAMPLES, specific names need to be given to prove the point.

I stated that the OP was not about Comey and you are calling me a liar because I negated it in the attack you sent.

Once again "I made no such ERROR. The OP is not about Comey but about Trump". You are the one trying to move the goalposts to fulfill your desire to find something I have done wrong.

You are certainly entitled to your opinion and believe whatever your sick mind wants to believe. Nonetheless, the reality is not how you see it.

Once again, you are a biased piece of shit!!!!!
 
15th post
^Just more socially educated content^...I'm a democrat, and you are not correcting what it is you pretend to be a lie in my post as it is spot on.
WTF is "socially educated"? And I don't care what party you belong to.
 
WTF is "socially educated"?
white liberal as opposed to academic, your posts scream socially educated as you have no idea how an analogy works and are full of the lavatory wall english class language as learned in socially educated settings.
And I don't care what party you belong to.
so the "maga" reference was for both the democrats and GOP "maga"?
 
white liberal as opposed to academic, your posts scream socially educated as you have no idea how an analogy works and are full of the lavatory wall english class language as learned in socially educated settings.

so the "maga" reference was for both the democrats and GOP "MAGA"?
The resurgence of fascism in the US, and around the world, isn't tied to any particular party. Some people just get off on authoritarian government. Not sure why.
 
Back
Top Bottom