The Sword of the Gospel

[Erinwltr]

I reported you to the F.B.I. so you can look forward to a visit from them in the near future.

lol so what? You're going to end up on their list as a nut job with zero cred, so I encourage you to report all kinds of stuff to them, moron. Do you think they all come from Iceland or something, tard? lol

Gee, I'm so sorry that I reported a guy who posts "I have not come to bring peace, but a sword" with a photo of himself with a big-ass knife!! Does that sound like a terroristic threat to you? Or what? Is that a joke? Are you a moron? I have never reported anything or anyone to the F.B.I. before, but as soon as I saw that post, I looked up the F.B.I.'s website. If that guy isn't a potential terrorist, I don't know who is.

It's a Bible quote. And you don't know Svet. He's not a terrorist. You overreacted due to ignorance. Leave him alone.

It's a Bible quote. And you don't know Svet. He's not a terrorist. You overreacted due to ignorance. Leave him alone.

.
what desert religion is not a terrorist organization ...

View attachment 361383

* the ones above would not be grabbing a culinary butcher knife - morty's choice of weapon speaks of their true disposition. disturbing photo. you're who needs help - ram.

Give it a rest.

Socialism intentionally denies examination because it is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. Socialism seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership Socialism has an extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. Socialists dismiss their defeats and ignore their incongruities. They desire big government and use big government to implement their morally relativistic social policies. Socialism is a religion. The religious nature of socialism explains their hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. Their dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. They see no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism and normalization of deviance. They worship science but are the first to reject it when it suits their purposes. They can be identified by an external locus of control. Their religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and equality via uniformity and communal ownership. They practice critical theory which is the Cultural Marxist theory to criticize what they do not believe to arrive at what they do believe without ever having to examine what they believe. They confuse critical theory for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity. Something they never do.

I'm hanging on with batted breath, just couldn't wait to read your Useless Wall of Words. I mean really, I can copy and post any part of it to just put the Trash Out.

Good for you. You seek uniformity too. You are just as hateful as BreezeWood

It’s not a good look.

Interesting. I'm very close to being as Hateful. But not. All you had to do was read that Worthless Words of Walls.

You are exactly what you profess you hate.

You don't get to speak for me, ding. You post hate, not me.

 

[BreezeWood]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

 

[ding]

I reported you to the F.B.I. so you can look forward to a visit from them in the near future.

lol so what? You're going to end up on their list as a nut job with zero cred, so I encourage you to report all kinds of stuff to them, moron. Do you think they all come from Iceland or something, tard? lol

Gee, I'm so sorry that I reported a guy who posts "I have not come to bring peace, but a sword" with a photo of himself with a big-ass knife!! Does that sound like a terroristic threat to you? Or what? Is that a joke? Are you a moron? I have never reported anything or anyone to the F.B.I. before, but as soon as I saw that post, I looked up the F.B.I.'s website. If that guy isn't a potential terrorist, I don't know who is.

It's a Bible quote. And you don't know Svet. He's not a terrorist. You overreacted due to ignorance. Leave him alone.

It's a Bible quote. And you don't know Svet. He's not a terrorist. You overreacted due to ignorance. Leave him alone.

.
what desert religion is not a terrorist organization ...

View attachment 361383

* the ones above would not be grabbing a culinary butcher knife - morty's choice of weapon speaks of their true disposition. disturbing photo. you're who needs help - ram.

Give it a rest.

Socialism intentionally denies examination because it is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. Socialism seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership Socialism has an extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. Socialists dismiss their defeats and ignore their incongruities. They desire big government and use big government to implement their morally relativistic social policies. Socialism is a religion. The religious nature of socialism explains their hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. Their dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. They see no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism and normalization of deviance. They worship science but are the first to reject it when it suits their purposes. They can be identified by an external locus of control. Their religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and equality via uniformity and communal ownership. They practice critical theory which is the Cultural Marxist theory to criticize what they do not believe to arrive at what they do believe without ever having to examine what they believe. They confuse critical theory for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity. Something they never do.

I'm hanging on with batted breath, just couldn't wait to read your Useless Wall of Words. I mean really, I can copy and post any part of it to just put the Trash Out.

Good for you. You seek uniformity too. You are just as hateful as BreezeWood

It’s not a good look.

Interesting. I'm very close to being as Hateful. But not. All you had to do was read that Worthless Words of Walls.

You are exactly what you profess you hate.

You don't get to speak for me, ding. You post hate, not me.

I'm not speaking for you. I am speaking for myself by telling telling you what I have observed.

 

[ding]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

 

[BreezeWood]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

 

[ding]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

 

[Picaro]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

 

[ding]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

According to him the entire dogma of the religion of antiquity is do no evil. That's it. Nothing else. Not sure who wrote that down or how a forgery occurred after that because he's kinda lite on details.

 

[BreezeWood]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

.
forgeries and fallacies many times have been provide for the two - serpents ...

Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

they cackle and whine, twist and turn then slither away.

 

[BreezeWood]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

According to him the entire dogma of the religion of antiquity is do no evil. That's it. Nothing else. Not sure who wrote that down or how a forgery occurred after that because he's kinda lite on details.

According to him the entire dogma of the religion of antiquity is do no evil. That's it. Nothing else. Not sure who wrote that down or how a forgery occurred after that because he's kinda lite on details.

.
- to triumph, one or the other for there to be a final judgement.

the triumph of good vs evil - is the religion of antiquity as prescribed by the Almighty. to become sinless for admission to the Everlasting - - - yes, that is all there is. for the religion.

 

[ding]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

According to him the entire dogma of the religion of antiquity is do no evil. That's it. Nothing else. Not sure who wrote that down or how a forgery occurred after that because he's kinda lite on details.

According to him the entire dogma of the religion of antiquity is do no evil. That's it. Nothing else. Not sure who wrote that down or how a forgery occurred after that because he's kinda lite on details.

.
- to triumph, one or the other for there to be a final judgement.

the triumph of good vs evil - is the religion of antiquity as prescribed by the Almighty. to become sinless for admission to the Everlasting - - - yes, that is all there is. for the religion.

The average man needs to be instructed in God. Abraham, who received a large measure of prophetic inspiration, called his fellow men together and led them by training and instruction to the truth which he had perceived. Thus Abraham taught, and showed by philosophical arguments that there is one God, that He has created everything that exists beside Him, and that neither the constellations nor anything in the air ought to be worshiped; he trained his fellow-men in this
belief. Abraham induced his fellow-men to do what is right. Throughout the history of Israel, there have always been prophets who instructed the people on God's ways. It is but natural that it should be so. It is no different than instructing a small child. We do it all the time.

We instruct to create first correct notions of God. We lead people by instruction and education, to an accurate knowledge of the Universe. The sole object of all the trials mentioned in Scripture is to teach man what he ought to do or believe; so that the event which forms the actual trial is not the end desired, but an example for our instruction and guidance.

It was through the mouth of Moses that the Divine instruction was revealed to Israel. According to your belief, that was totally unnecessary. Right?

 

[BreezeWood]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

According to him the entire dogma of the religion of antiquity is do no evil. That's it. Nothing else. Not sure who wrote that down or how a forgery occurred after that because he's kinda lite on details.

According to him the entire dogma of the religion of antiquity is do no evil. That's it. Nothing else. Not sure who wrote that down or how a forgery occurred after that because he's kinda lite on details.

.
- to triumph, one or the other for there to be a final judgement.

the triumph of good vs evil - is the religion of antiquity as prescribed by the Almighty. to become sinless for admission to the Everlasting - - - yes, that is all there is. for the religion.

The average man needs to be instructed in God. Abraham, who received a large measure of prophetic inspiration, called his fellow men together and led them by training and instruction to the truth which he had perceived. Thus Abraham taught, and showed by philosophical arguments that there is one God, that He has created everything that exists beside Him, and that neither the constellations nor anything in the air ought to be worshiped; he trained his fellow-men in this
belief. Abraham induced his fellow-men to do what is right. Throughout the history of Israel, there have always been prophets who instructed the people on God's ways. It is but natural that it should be so. It is no different than instructing a small child. We do it all the time.

We instruct to create first correct notions of God. We lead people by instruction and education, to an accurate knowledge of the Universe. The sole object of all the trials mentioned in Scripture is to teach man what he ought to do or believe; so that the event which forms the actual trial is not the end desired, but an example for our instruction and guidance.

It was through the mouth of Moses that the Divine instruction was revealed to Israel. According to your belief, that was totally unnecessary. Right?

The average man needs to be instructed in God. Abraham, who received a large measure of prophetic inspiration, called his fellow men together and led them by training and instruction to the truth which he had perceived.

.
that's a rather odd belief you have, bing ...

the average man needs to be taught by abraham ... how convenient for the teachers. - do you happen to be one of them, your conversations with mr. big and all.

the spoken religion of antiquity is six words long - if they do not get it that really would not make any difference at all how they live their life is all that matters.

 

[ding]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

According to him the entire dogma of the religion of antiquity is do no evil. That's it. Nothing else. Not sure who wrote that down or how a forgery occurred after that because he's kinda lite on details.

According to him the entire dogma of the religion of antiquity is do no evil. That's it. Nothing else. Not sure who wrote that down or how a forgery occurred after that because he's kinda lite on details.

.
- to triumph, one or the other for there to be a final judgement.

the triumph of good vs evil - is the religion of antiquity as prescribed by the Almighty. to become sinless for admission to the Everlasting - - - yes, that is all there is. for the religion.

The average man needs to be instructed in God. Abraham, who received a large measure of prophetic inspiration, called his fellow men together and led them by training and instruction to the truth which he had perceived. Thus Abraham taught, and showed by philosophical arguments that there is one God, that He has created everything that exists beside Him, and that neither the constellations nor anything in the air ought to be worshiped; he trained his fellow-men in this
belief. Abraham induced his fellow-men to do what is right. Throughout the history of Israel, there have always been prophets who instructed the people on God's ways. It is but natural that it should be so. It is no different than instructing a small child. We do it all the time.

We instruct to create first correct notions of God. We lead people by instruction and education, to an accurate knowledge of the Universe. The sole object of all the trials mentioned in Scripture is to teach man what he ought to do or believe; so that the event which forms the actual trial is not the end desired, but an example for our instruction and guidance.

It was through the mouth of Moses that the Divine instruction was revealed to Israel. According to your belief, that was totally unnecessary. Right?

The average man needs to be instructed in God. Abraham, who received a large measure of prophetic inspiration, called his fellow men together and led them by training and instruction to the truth which he had perceived.

.
that's a rather odd belief you have, bing ...

the average man needs to be taught by abraham ... how convenient for the teachers. - do you happen to be one of them, your conversations with mr. big and all.

the spoken religion of antiquity is six words long - if they do not get it that really would not make any difference at all how they live their life is all that matters.

More than 90% of everything anyone knows was accepted on authority. Anyone who would scoff at accepting knowledge on authority would have to be content going through life knowing next to nothing.

You approach metaphysical problems without proper understanding or preparation. You are like a person who journeys towards a certain place, and on the road falls into a deep pit, out of which you have never escaped. It would have been better for you to have never taken your journey and stayed at home. That is how messed up your beliefs are.

In the book of Proverbs, Solomon discusses sluggards and their indolence, by which he figuratively refers to indolence in the search after wisdom. He thus speaks of a man who desires to know the final results, but does not exert himself to understand the preliminary disciplines which lead to them, doing nothing else but desire. That's you. You criticize what you do not understand and have no understanding or ability to articulate what you do believe in any depth at all.

The average man needs to be instructed in God. Abraham, who received a large measure of prophetic inspiration, called his fellow men together and led them by training and instruction to the truth which he had perceived. Thus Abraham taught, and showed by philosophical arguments that there is one God, that He has created everything that exists beside Him, and that neither the constellations nor anything in the air ought to be worshiped; he trained his fellow-men in this
belief. Abraham induced his fellow-men to do what is right. Throughout the history of Israel, there have always been prophets who instructed the people on God's ways. It is but natural that it should be so. It is no different than instructing a small child. We do it all the time.

We instruct to create first correct notions of God. We lead people by instruction and education, to an accurate knowledge of the Universe. The sole object of all the trials mentioned in Scripture is to teach man what he ought to do or believe; so that the event which forms the actual trial is not the end desired, but an example for our instruction and guidance.

 

[Picaro]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

.
forgeries and fallacies many times have been provide for the two - serpents ...

Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

they cackle and whine, twist and turn then slither away.

lol so Adam and Eve hunted serpents and ate them? Fascinating. Where, exactly, are those verses?

 

[ding]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

.
forgeries and fallacies many times have been provide for the two - serpents ...

Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

they cackle and whine, twist and turn then slither away.

lol so Adam and Eve hunted serpents and ate them? Fascinating. Where, exactly, are those verses?

Dude, don't make any sense. But he sure has a hard on for Christianity

Which country do you think he's from?

 

[BreezeWood]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

.
forgeries and fallacies many times have been provide for the two - serpents ...

Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

they cackle and whine, twist and turn then slither away.

lol so Adam and Eve hunted serpents and ate them? Fascinating. Where, exactly, are those verses?

lol so Adam and Eve hunted serpents and ate them? Fascinating. Where, exactly, are those verses?

.
no, they did not succumb to your venom, they asked to be set free and their request was granted.

too bad the serpents remain as reminders and figments of the task they were set out to accomplish. to rid humanity of the - sicko's ... and the forgeries and fallacies blocking their way - bing.

 

[Picaro]

.
bing reflects well - their 4th century book of forgeries and fallacies - as a supplement for the aspirations and goals set from antiquity for the dynamic progression of life they knowingly disregard, the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs. That's your misrepresentation of our beliefs.

You do that all the time whether you are posting as Breezewood or Hobelim.

- the supplement of a messiah for their own responsibilities.

No. That is not an accurate reflection of our beliefs.

.
the 1st century religious itinerant never claimed the role of - - > "our beliefs".

that is the difference between the 1st century and the fallacy of the 4th century christian bible - whatever you claim as your beliefs from wherever they arose, at best a hybrid of self ingratiating hyperbole does not reflect the true events of the 1st century.

You don’t even make sense most of the time. You speak in vague generalities that have no substance.

What exactly do you believe happened. Let’s have some names and dates.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

lol he doesn't know any; he just babbles 'Fourth Century n stuff!!!' over and over and over, doesn't have the first clue about textual analysis and how easily his stupid attempts fail from the word 'go'.

.
forgeries and fallacies many times have been provide for the two - serpents ...

Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

they cackle and whine, twist and turn then slither away.

lol so Adam and Eve hunted serpents and ate them? Fascinating. Where, exactly, are those verses?

Dude, don't make any sense. But he sure has a hard on for Christianity

Which country do you think he's from?

Don't know, but probably a commie and a deviant. He never expalins why he thinks tha tone line is a 'forgery', either. Does he have handwriting samples or something? lol

 

[Picaro]

.
no, they did not succumb to your venom, they asked to be set free and their request was granted.

too bad the serpents remain as reminders and figments of the task they were set out to accomplish. to rid humanity of the - sicko's ... and the forgeries and fallacies blocking their way - bing.

lol this makes even less sense than your usual attempts at 'Clever Stuff'.

 

[BreezeWood]

.
no, they did not succumb to your venom, they asked to be set free and their request was granted.

too bad the serpents remain as reminders and figments of the task they were set out to accomplish. to rid humanity of the - sicko's ... and the forgeries and fallacies blocking their way - bing.

lol this makes even less sense than your usual attempts at 'Clever Stuff'.

lol this makes even less sense than your usual attempts at 'Clever Stuff'.

.
then why respond ...

your weakness is you have nothing of your own to offer - than what belongs to others. or the forgeries and fallacies that keep you alive.

 

[buttercup]

Morty, that shit makes zero sense, dude. Bible passages are vermin. You look Fantastic in purple, by the way.

Christians are world wide persecuted and killed and tortured and ridiculed for their faith. So it is pretty true that there is the Sword here against the Christians. Even early christians died in the name of Christ. Right? It doesnt mean christians are aggressive or not peaceful. Right? Or that Christians do not love their neighbours.

Our battle is not physical, it is spiritual. I added the bold.

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, ​

but against principalities, against powers, ​

against the rulers of the darkness of this world, ​

against spiritual wickedness in high places.​

​

Therefore take up the whole armor of God,​

that you may be able to withstand in the evil day,​

and having done all, to stand firm.​

​

Stand therefore, having fastened on the belt of truth,​

and having put on the breastplate of righteousness,​

and, as shoes for your feet, having put on the readiness​

given by the gospel of peace.​

​

In all circumstances take up the shield of faith,​

with which you can extinguish all the flaming darts of the evil one;​

and take the helmet of salvation,​

and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God,​

praying at all times in the Spirit, with all prayer and supplication.​

​

Ephesians 6:12-18​

​