The Stupid Lie called The Theory of Evolution

[TheGreatKing]

Thank u for yr mountains of irrelevant chatter. That is what I expected. U can not prove stupidity to be true. I declare myself victor again.

 

[TheGreatKing]

BTW I am a very great fan of Science and KNOW that Science and other cultural revolutions in the modern world are the offshoots of Religion. And most of the top Scientists and other leaders in various fields of the world yesterday and today like Newton, Picasso, Pope John Paul II, Bill Gates, Prince Charles, Mark Zuckerberg and your truly self are the parts of Lord Jesus Christ, I being the highest amongst them. There is nothing wrong with Science. It is just that TOE is not science; it is nonsense of the devil. God bless you all.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

I have a question. Why did God bury all those things that look like old bones, ya know fossils?

The fossil record is no friend to evolution. We observe species suddenly appear and suddenly disappear. There is not this never-ending transitional evidence where things are becoming other things... there should be, if that's what happened.

You doubt evolution for the same reason you doubt climate change...

you simply don't want to believe that either happened.

It's not about what I want to believe. It's about what Science has proved.

When you prove your science, I will believe it. Right now, all you really have is a theory and it's a shaky theory at best, given our modern understanding of mitochondria.

Let's back up. You do not accept the theory that any living thing has evolved over time, instead there are simply species which die out and very similar species take their place?

 

[PK1]

There is tons of evidence supporting evolutionary theory, both biological and physical.

There is tons of evidence supporting micro-evolution. Small adaptive changes over time to produce new species within a genus taxa. There is exactly NO evidence to support macro-evolution.

---
You're confused scientifically, again.
Speciation, whether "macroevolution" or "microevolution", reflects "small" adaptive changes in the genome to produce new species.
In the longer timeframe across thousands or millions of years ("macro"), speciation results in greater differences in group genomes, reflecting different classes beyond the species level.
Paleontological research has provided evidence reflecting patterns of speciation across taxonomy groups.

If you don't believe in science theories on how humans evolved, what is your alternative explanation?
.

 

[The Great Goose]

How could a pig grow into an elephant? The idea is absurd. If it cant reach branches higher up, then it dies of starvation. If it can then it lives and breeds. But i cant see how a nose would grow longer.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I have already proven that God exists and that Roman Catholicism is the truest religion. I am not going to get dragged into this discussion again. The purpose of this thread is not religious. God is proven simply because TOE is wrong. The only other possibility is ID and the designer is God. U have nothing to argue for TOE and are talking irrelevant things and the devils are laughing their hearts out in the sidelines.

I'm sure you have.

And I've proven I'm God, so bow down and pray to me.

Come on now we all know God only visited once and he only talked to

Moses
Jesus
Mohammad
Joseph Smith

Or Scientology or jehovas are right.

Or none of them are right

They're all wrong, I'm God.

 

[PK1]

How could a pig grow into an elephant? The idea is absurd. If it cant reach branches higher up, then it dies of starvation. If it can then it lives and breeds. But i cant see how a nose would grow longer.

---
You must be kidding, right?

.

 

[The Great Goose]

How could a pig grow into an elephant? The idea is absurd. If it cant reach branches higher up, then it dies of starvation. If it can then it lives and breeds. But i cant see how a nose would grow longer.

---
You must be kidding, right?

.

No! I don't take Darwin's theory of evolution for granted. No.

 

[ScienceRocks]

It takes a really weak mind to limit ones self to faith without any reasoning. Evolution has a lot of backing and it is down right scary to find so many haters of science, exploration and rational thought on this board.

 

[The Great Goose]

It takes a really weak mind to limit ones self to faith without any reasoning. Evolution has a lot of backing and it is down right scary to find so many haters of science, exploration and rational thought on this board.

Oh Co! mon! What has "science" done for you lately?

 

[ScienceRocks]

It takes a really weak mind to limit ones self to faith without any reasoning. Evolution has a lot of backing and it is down right scary to find so many haters of science, exploration and rational thought on this board.

Oh Co! mon! What has "science" done for you lately?

Doubled my life span
Makes sure my food is clean. The understanding of food born diseases is one reason why this is so.
Allows me to drive a car. This allows me to travel long distances that would take days or weeks before them.
Allows me to talk over the internet to people thousands of miles away.
Increases my standards of life

 

[ScienceRocks]

What has god done for you lately?

 

[The Great Goose]

It takes a really weak mind to limit ones self to faith without any reasoning. Evolution has a lot of backing and it is down right scary to find so many haters of science, exploration and rational thought on this board.

Oh Co! mon! What has "science" done for you lately?

Doubled my life span
Makes sure my food is clean. The understanding of food born diseases is one reason why this is so.
Allows me to drive a car. This allows me to travel long distances that would take days or weeks before them.
Allows me to talk over the internet to people thousands of miles away.
Increases my standards of life

Yes yes, but has it done anything else?

 

[The Great Goose]

What has god done for you lately?

Nothing good.

 

[Dr Grump]

God made bodies of all animals and man based on the same Master-plan. All of them eat, digest, egest, respire, copulate, hear, see, taste, etc. So all of them have similar organs to perform these functions. He also graded animals and man according to the complexity of functions He gave them. So amoeba comes near the beginning, fishes and frogs later, followed by cats, dogs, tigers, lions and finally by Man.

The Master-plan of God was obvious to anyone even before Charles Darwin. Charles Darwin made use of this Master-plan for devil's lying purpose. He studied the anatomy of each animal in detail and understood the gradation system of God. He placed all animals on the table starting with the lowest and ending with the highest, Man. And he lied that the higher animals "evolved" from the lower ones, although they were created just like that by God.

The placement of animals in the right order is the only "proof" that Evolutionists are offering to the world and that is not a proof at all. There are no proofs of evolution in the entire history of mankind. And none even before his history, even if we suppose that the earth and its inhabitants were made before the history of man.

There is no proof god exists either....shrug....

 

[PK1]

How could a pig grow into an elephant? The idea is absurd. If it cant reach branches higher up, then it dies of starvation. If it can then it lives and breeds. But i cant see how a nose would grow longer.

You must be kidding, right?

No! I don't take Darwin's theory of evolution for granted. No.

---
Ok, then.
The TOE (theory of evolution) does not theorize that an elephant or ANY other species today grew from a pig.
TOE theorizes that ALL current species evolved from a common ancestor, whether that speciation process took thousands of years or millions of years.
.

 

[The Great Goose]

What has god done for you lately?

Wait no i misread! God has done everything forme lately. I have a roof over my head and food. I have the envy of bigots and the admiration of everyone else. He kept me safe from the mob and two conspiracies for 4 years. 4 long years.

God has helped me HEAPS lately.

 

[The Great Goose]

How could a pig grow into an elephant? The idea is absurd. If it cant reach branches higher up, then it dies of starvation. If it can then it lives and breeds. But i cant see how a nose would grow longer.

You must be kidding, right?

No! I don't take Darwin's theory of evolution for granted. No.

---
Ok, then.
The TOE (theory of evolution) does not theorize that an elephant or ANY other species today grew from a pig.
TOE theorizes that ALL current species evolved from a common ancestor, whether that speciation process took thousands of years or millions of years.
.

The world hasn't been around that long.

 

[Boss]

I have a question. Why did God bury all those things that look like old bones, ya know fossils?

The fossil record is no friend to evolution. We observe species suddenly appear and suddenly disappear. There is not this never-ending transitional evidence where things are becoming other things... there should be, if that's what happened.

You doubt evolution for the same reason you doubt climate change...

you simply don't want to believe that either happened.

It's not about what I want to believe. It's about what Science has proved.

When you prove your science, I will believe it. Right now, all you really have is a theory and it's a shaky theory at best, given our modern understanding of mitochondria.

Let's back up. You do not accept the theory that any living thing has evolved over time, instead there are simply species which die out and very similar species take their place?

No.. I never have said that nothing has ever evolved over time.... AGAIN... MICRO-evolution is evident. Small adaptive changes over time to form new species... that happens. Our remarkable DNA coding allows for adaptive changes within our genera.

95% of the species our planet has hosted have gone extinct. We see in the fossil record, when these species died out... we also see where new species emerged... suddenly, not transitionally. If your theory were true, we could expect the fossil record to be rife with examples of cross-genus evolution and instead, we find ZIPPOLA!

 

[Boss]

You're confused scientifically, again.
Speciation, whether "macroevolution" or "microevolution", reflects "small" adaptive changes in the genome to produce new species.
In the longer timeframe across thousands or millions of years ("macro"), speciation results in greater differences in group genomes, reflecting different classes beyond the species level.
Paleontological research has provided evidence reflecting patterns of speciation across taxonomy groups.

If you don't believe in science theories on how humans evolved, what is your alternative explanation?

I am not confused scientifically.... apparently YOU are.

You are taking a THEORY that hasn't been substantiated with facts and trying to make that the fact. You support the theory of macro-evolution on the back of micro-evolution. Science doesn't work that way. We don't piggyback one theory on top of another. Every theory has to stand on it's own merit and macro-evolution simply doesn't do that.

The reason you have been trying in vain to prove this theory for nearly 100 years without success is found in the DNA mitochondria. This is something people like Darwin knew absolutely nothing about.. it had not been discovered. Each living organism contains a DNA molecule which is operated by the mitochondria. The mitochondria of each genus has it's own specific combination of amino acids and enzymes which make it function and nothing else works. Mutations can only happen within the parameters of the mitochondria and it's affiliated amino acids and enzymes and this restricts the organism to the genera in which it belongs.

In short... that means you can have MICRO-evolution... you can't have MACRO-evolution.