The scientific approach to these is to say “I don’t know yet” and keep on looking, not to presume an answer which makes us comfortable.
And yet... That's EXACTLY what you do with Evolution, Origin, Abiogenesis and God.
Wrong again. See why I love this website?
There are no absolute truths in science; all laws, theories and conclusions can become obsolete if they are found in contradiction with new evidence. However, a
scientific theory is the highest honor any scientific principle can obtain, for they comprise all the evidence, laws and models relevant to an observed phenomena.
Science is an exercise in falsifiability. Unlike religious dogma, which presumes the truth, the
scientific method is a self correcting process, an ever sharpening blade. The models used by science to explain observations and make predictions are simply the ‘most correct’ at the time. The greatest skepticism should always be reserved for inflexible positions whose proponents insist that they and their assertions are above question and examination.
Number 40.
And you want me to type this myself rather than cut and paste when this site debunks every point you make so brilliantly?
Why there is no god
I'm perfectly ok with finding out macro evolution isn't real. I would LOVE to find out that the reptiles and birds and amphibians and fish are not related to us. If the scientific community ever decides this, I'll be the first one to admit you were right.