The Source of the Left's Inappropriate Behavior

[alang1216]

The world is black and white. Only Progressive Liberal Socialist Pukes live in a gray, murky world of degenerate evil.

Your world maybe, the real world has only grays.

Better see an eye doctor, Mr. Magoo.

Spoken like an ideologue that refuses to see beyond his beliefs.

Oh, the irony!

I've proven the point a number of times, and you simply post 'is not, isssss noootttttttt!!!'

Clearly, you're an ideologue that refuses to see beyond his beliefs.

Nice response, someone has tweaked your code! Unfortunately you need to work on what you respond to. Keep up the good work.

 

[PoliticalChic]

2. "...show us how modern Liberalism is the spawn of Karl Marx."

Easy peasy, lemon squeezy....

These are two of the aims of the CPUSA (Communist Party, USA):

a. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce

b. . Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

You provided the aims of the CPUSA but neglected to show any connection between modern Liberalism and either Karl Marx or the CPUSA.

Modern Liberalism is the spawn of Karl Marx, the pillar of whose doctrine is the destruction of the family, and religion.
These are two of the aims of the CPUSA (Communist Party, USA):

a. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce

b. . Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."





9. Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie." Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2...
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)



10. After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family. See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.
Articles: The Abolition of the Family






And....if the simpletons of the Left.....who never read books.....need even more proof of Marx, and Modern Liberals consubstantiation....

11. "5 Things Marx Wanted to Abolish (Besides Private Property)
The family:
Marx admits that destroying the family is a thorny topic, even for revolutionaries. “Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists,” he writes.

But he said opponents of this idea fail to understand a key fact about the family.

“On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie,” he writes.

Best of all, abolishing the family would be relatively easy once bourgeois property was abolished. “The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.”
5 Things Marx Wanted to Abolish (Besides Private Property) | Jon Miltimore

"And....if the simpletons of the Left.....who never read books.....need even more proof of Marx, and Modern Liberals consubstantiation...."

And yet again you neglected to show any connection between modern Liberalism and either Karl Marx or the CPUSA. I'm thinking you can't do it, just admit you were wrong. Show you're a better person than some others that can never admit error.

Modern Liberalism is the spawn of Karl Marx, the pillar of whose doctrine is the destruction of the family, and religion.
These are two of the aims of the CPUSA (Communist Party, USA):

a. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce

b. . Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."





9. Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie." Marx and Engels, Communist Manifesto, ch 2...
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)



10. After losing power, Leon Trotsky would claim that the reason that communism had not been successful was that Stalin had not been ruthless enough in his efforts to eliminate the family. See Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed, trans. Max Eastman, New York, 1965, pp. 145ff.
Articles: The Abolition of the Family






And....if the simpletons of the Left.....who never read books.....need even more proof of Marx, and Modern Liberals consubstantiation....

11. "5 Things Marx Wanted to Abolish (Besides Private Property)
The family:
Marx admits that destroying the family is a thorny topic, even for revolutionaries. “Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists,” he writes.

But he said opponents of this idea fail to understand a key fact about the family.

“On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie,” he writes.

Best of all, abolishing the family would be relatively easy once bourgeois property was abolished. “The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.”
5 Things Marx Wanted to Abolish (Besides Private Property) | Jon Miltimore

You keep posting the same things over and over. It's almost as if you're stuck in a loop...

Admit it, you're a mindless web bot that accumulates random right-wing web pages and just reposts them in response to questions. Nothing to be ashamed of, for AI you're fairly sophisticated.

Every time you've asked for the affinity of Liberalism and Marxism, I've provided it.

And each time you ignore same, and repeat the query.


I can help:
“The role that one assigns to truthfulness will always remain central in considering what kind of person one wants to be—how one wishes to treat, not only other people, but oneself.”
― Sissela Bok, "Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life"

 

[PoliticalChic]

12. The behavior of Matt Lauer, Weinstein...even Bill 'the rapist' Clinton are subchapters under 'Liberalism's smashing of millennia of traditions and values."


Specifically, the Liberal view that humans are free to behave like animals do, with no sense of responsibility or honor vis-a-vis family and sexual interaction, is a giant step back for society. The sixties infamously proclaimed, 'If it feels good, do it!"....and now we see those in a position (pun intended) to, doing exactly that.


I blame Liberalism/Marxism, and the brain dead acolytes less so.
Liberalism has spent decades telling women that they don't need a family, don't need a husband, and can behave sexually in the very same fashion that they complained about men behaving.

Now the hypocrites are all about punishing the folks who behaved as they were conditioned to, this after they normalized abhorrent behavior.



Liberalism has destroyed our culture and is poised to destroy our civilization.

 

[alang1216]

Every time you've asked for the affinity of Liberalism and Marxism, I've provided it.

If you read your posts you'll see that you say what is wrong with Marxism but only imply that Liberalism is the exact same thing. You give no evidence for any link between Liberalism and Marxism. Saying "Modern Liberalism is the spawn of Karl Marx" is not proof of anything except that you can't provide evidence of such a link.

 

[PoliticalChic]

13. Ned Ryun:
"Liberals are acting horrified at "the end result of the conditioning that they have received for years....this is a culture that the Left created....some of us [conservatives] have rejected that culture, we actually believe in self-discipline, we actually believe in virtue, ..

..now they want to behave that sort of behavior [Weinstein, Lauer, Clinton] on all men...it didn't come from the Right, it was created by the Left....."



Snippet from 11/27/2017 Tucker Carlson Tonight where he interviews Ned Ryun. Discussing his article "In Defense of Masculinity"

 

[PoliticalChic]

Every time you've asked for the affinity of Liberalism and Marxism, I've provided it.

If you read your posts you'll see that you say what is wrong with Marxism but only imply that Liberalism is the exact same thing. You give no evidence for any link between Liberalism and Marxism. Saying "Modern Liberalism is the spawn of Karl Marx" is not proof of anything except that you can't provide evidence of such a link.

It's a mathematical proof:
Things equal to the same thing are equal to each other.
This is the case with Marxism and Liberalism.


The concept, it seems, is over your head.

 

[PoliticalChic]

14. Mark Steyn, at 20:00

"...we're short of what we used to quaintly call courtship rituals, and we risk ...having nothing between the rather cold world of what we call hook-ups, and friends with benefits and....Harvey Weinstein....

There are no longer any agreed social rituals as to how you are meant to proceed...and re-establishing that kind of architecture is really the challenge."



Step #1: Liberals must be removed from positions of power, as well as those who disseminate information.
Forthwith.
Society depends on it.

 

[alang1216]

Every time you've asked for the affinity of Liberalism and Marxism, I've provided it.

If you read your posts you'll see that you say what is wrong with Marxism but only imply that Liberalism is the exact same thing. You give no evidence for any link between Liberalism and Marxism. Saying "Modern Liberalism is the spawn of Karl Marx" is not proof of anything except that you can't provide evidence of such a link.

It's a mathematical proof:
Things equal to the same thing are equal to each other.
This is the case with Marxism and Liberalism.


The concept, it seems, is over your head.

Let's assume you've 'proved' the objectives of Marx. The part of the proof you missed is demonstrating that liberalism espouses the same objectives as Marxism. Until you can do that you won't get a passing grade.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Every time you've asked for the affinity of Liberalism and Marxism, I've provided it.

If you read your posts you'll see that you say what is wrong with Marxism but only imply that Liberalism is the exact same thing. You give no evidence for any link between Liberalism and Marxism. Saying "Modern Liberalism is the spawn of Karl Marx" is not proof of anything except that you can't provide evidence of such a link.

It's a mathematical proof:
Things equal to the same thing are equal to each other.
This is the case with Marxism and Liberalism.


The concept, it seems, is over your head.

Let's assume you've 'proved' the objectives of Marx. The part of the proof you missed is demonstrating that liberalism espouses the same objectives as Marxism. Until you can do that you won't get a passing grade.

1. Why would the class dunce imagine (I almost said think) that he could hand out the grades???

2. Liberalism and the Communist Party:
How about you take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.


Watch, and note the consubstantial basis of both the aims of the Communist Party and the Democrat Party:

......it is ...extraordinary.....the correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....

1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.

3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

4. . Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce



Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders?

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals



You might take a look at this one, too.
10 planks of Communist manifesto
Communist Manifesto 10 Planks

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.



"Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street - Shadowproof

And this:

"Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too.Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917(Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately."
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.


They didn't call it ObamaCare....




....we are now free of that inordinate fear of communism.... Jimmy Carter Jimmy Carter: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - Address at Commencement Exercises at the University


President Barack Obama downplayed the differences between capitalism and communism, claiming that they are just “intellectual arguments.” He urged those at a town hall eventin Buenos Aires, Argentina on Wednesday to “just choose from what works.”
Obama Downplays Difference Between Capitalism, Communism [VIDEO]

 

[alang1216]

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

I take you couldn't find similar statements from the Democratic Party platform. Until you can show similar goals there you are just MAKING STUFF UP.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

I take you couldn't find similar statements from the Democratic Party platform. Until you can show similar goals there you are just MAKING STUFF UP.

This IS the Democrat Platform:


Watch, and note the consubstantial basis of both the aims of the Communist Party and the Democrat Party:

......it is ...extraordinary.....the correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....

1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.

3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

4. . Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce


Democrats BOO GOD At Convention

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Democrats heckling the opening prayer during the first night of the Democratic National Convention




2. Kinda reminds of this.....

"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A millionphysicalsins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY

This is the basis, the explanation, for the anti-Religion view you've been taught in government schools, and by the secular media, and the culture of Matt Lauer, Bill 'the rapist' Clinton, and Harvey Weinstein




3. It began early for the Democrats:

September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR. "The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow," byDennis J. Dunn, p. 137

As a result of Franklin Roosevelt's tireless efforts to make a home for communism in America, we are saddled with the Bolshevik/Democrat/Liberal view of virtue, morality, and commitment.

 

[alang1216]

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

I take you couldn't find similar statements from the Democratic Party platform. Until you can show similar goals there you are just MAKING STUFF UP.

This IS the Democrat Platform...

Just because you say it doesn't make it real. Prove it or shut up.

Democrats BOO GOD At Convention

Not true, another attempt at FAKE NEWS. They are objecting to recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. You really should be ashamed of yourself and you might want a refresher on the 9th Commandment:

The bearing of false testimony is strictly prohibited by God, no matter how innovative we become! Any understanding of what God was saying to His children is greatly enhanced by a clear understanding of what it means to tell a lie. Bearing false testimony also carries with it the basic idea of fabrication, which, simply put, means to make something up. Exaggeration fits right in with God’s prohibition because any effort to stretch the truth is, in and of itself, a fabrication. When God said, “You shall not bear false witness” (Exodus 20:16), He was definitively pointing to the heart of man. Not even a person’s creativity with the truth is acceptable to God.​

 

[alang1216]

1. Democrats heckling the opening prayer during the first night of the Democratic National Convention




2. Kinda reminds of this.....

"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A millionphysicalsins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY

This is the basis, the explanation, for the anti-Religion view you've been taught in government schools, and by the secular media, and the culture of Matt Lauer, Bill 'the rapist' Clinton, and Harvey Weinstein




3. It began early for the Democrats:

September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR. "The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow," byDennis J. Dunn, p. 137

As a result of Franklin Roosevelt's tireless efforts to make a home for communism in America, we are saddled with the Bolshevik/Democrat/Liberal view of virtue, morality, and commitment.

More BS. The booing was for Hillary Clinton, not God.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

I take you couldn't find similar statements from the Democratic Party platform. Until you can show similar goals there you are just MAKING STUFF UP.

This IS the Democrat Platform...

Just because you say it doesn't make it real. Prove it or shut up.

Democrats BOO GOD At Convention

Not true, another attempt at FAKE NEWS. They are objecting to recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. You really should be ashamed of yourself and you might want a refresher on the 9th Commandment:

The bearing of false testimony is strictly prohibited by God, no matter how innovative we become! Any understanding of what God was saying to His children is greatly enhanced by a clear understanding of what it means to tell a lie. Bearing false testimony also carries with it the basic idea of fabrication, which, simply put, means to make something up. Exaggeration fits right in with God’s prohibition because any effort to stretch the truth is, in and of itself, a fabrication. When God said, “You shall not bear false witness” (Exodus 20:16), He was definitively pointing to the heart of man. Not even a person’s creativity with the truth is acceptable to God.​

I did prove it.

Stop lying.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Mark Steyn describes the culture Liberalism has given us:
"...we're short of what we used to quaintly call courtship rituals, and we risk ...having nothing between the rather cold world of what we call hook-ups, and friends with benefits and....Harvey Weinstein...."


Sidney Lumet's daughter describes the effect of said Liberal imprimatur on the culture, and the actions of a Liberal elite:

"Writer Jenny Lumet: Russell Simmons Sexually Violated Me (Guest Column)
I felt dread. I was tremulous. Off my feet. I felt an intense need to keep both of you calm. ... There were two men. One of whom obeyed the other. It was an overwhelming feeling.

You used your size to maneuver me, quickly, into the elevator. I said, "Wait. Wait." I felt dread....in the elevator, you pressed me into the corner with your body, your hands and your mouth.

The elevator did not stop on the way up to your apartment. I was moved very quickly inside. I recall hearing the apartment door closing behind us.

You moved me into a bedroom. I said, "Wait." You said nothing.


There was penetration.

You told me to turn over on my stomach. You said something about a part of my body. You did not ejaculate inside me.

When it was over, I got my clothes and quickly went down in the elevator by myself. You didn't try to stop me. I went home in a taxi. I was grateful to be secure in my home. I never told anyone this story until October 27 of this year (after the Harvey Weinstein story was in the news but weeks before the first public claims were made against you), when I told a girlfriend from childhood.

"Abusing women in any way, shape or form violates the very core of my being." — Russell Simmons
Writer Jenny Lumet: Russell Simmons Sexually Violated Me (Guest Column)






My God....what have they done.
Liberalism.
I see no way back

 

[DOTR]

Why blame the 'students' in the university of Liberal doctrine, when they were only acting out what they've been taught????

Put the blame where it belongs: those who produced the 'curriculum'....Liberalism writ large.



1. "NBC fires Matt Lauer after complaint about 'inappropriate sexual behavior'"
Matt Lauer fired from NBC News after complaint about 'inappropriate sexual behavior'


OMG! Poor Lauer....he must feel like the guy pulled over for doing 59 in a 50 mph zone, when everyone around him is doing 61!



a. Andrew Lack, the NBC News president, wrote this memo.

"Dear colleagues, on Monday night, we received a detailed complaint from a colleague about inappropriate sexual behavior in the workplace by Matt Lauer," Lack's statement read. "It represented, after serious review, a clear violation of our company's standards. As a result, we've decided to terminate his employment."

WHAT????


3. Andrew Lack is the hypocrite who put a damper on the Bill Clinton rape story...

"The Wall Street Journal's editorialists go further than Rabinowitz in accusing NBC News of playing politics with the truth. "With the revelations about the Juanita Broaddrick story by Dorothy Rabinowitz," a Friday Journal Review and Outlook speculated huffily, "perhaps NBC President Andy Lack will stop censoring his news division."
The ugliest story yet


4. And this same hypocrite, Andy Lack stopped the Harvey Weinstein rape revelations:

"NBC killed the Harvey Weinstein story: report
No matter how much proof Ronan Farrow provided them on Weinstein, NBC always had an excuse, according to a report"
NBC killed the Harvey Weinstein story: report




5. But this issue is far bigger than Lauer or Lack......it's about how Liberalism has destroyed our culture and is poised to destroy our civilization.

Modern Liberalism is the spawn of Karl Marx, the pillar of whose doctrine is the destruction of the family, and religion.

6. These are two of the aims of the CPUSA (Communist Party, USA):

a. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce

b. . Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."



The aim is to reverse thousands of years of tradition....and they have been mightily successful.

We all suffer as we reap what they sowed political chick.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why blame the 'students' in the university of Liberal doctrine, when they were only acting out what they've been taught????

Put the blame where it belongs: those who produced the 'curriculum'....Liberalism writ large.



1. "NBC fires Matt Lauer after complaint about 'inappropriate sexual behavior'"
Matt Lauer fired from NBC News after complaint about 'inappropriate sexual behavior'


OMG! Poor Lauer....he must feel like the guy pulled over for doing 59 in a 50 mph zone, when everyone around him is doing 61!



a. Andrew Lack, the NBC News president, wrote this memo.

"Dear colleagues, on Monday night, we received a detailed complaint from a colleague about inappropriate sexual behavior in the workplace by Matt Lauer," Lack's statement read. "It represented, after serious review, a clear violation of our company's standards. As a result, we've decided to terminate his employment."

WHAT????


3. Andrew Lack is the hypocrite who put a damper on the Bill Clinton rape story...

"The Wall Street Journal's editorialists go further than Rabinowitz in accusing NBC News of playing politics with the truth. "With the revelations about the Juanita Broaddrick story by Dorothy Rabinowitz," a Friday Journal Review and Outlook speculated huffily, "perhaps NBC President Andy Lack will stop censoring his news division."
The ugliest story yet


4. And this same hypocrite, Andy Lack stopped the Harvey Weinstein rape revelations:

"NBC killed the Harvey Weinstein story: report
No matter how much proof Ronan Farrow provided them on Weinstein, NBC always had an excuse, according to a report"
NBC killed the Harvey Weinstein story: report




5. But this issue is far bigger than Lauer or Lack......it's about how Liberalism has destroyed our culture and is poised to destroy our civilization.

Modern Liberalism is the spawn of Karl Marx, the pillar of whose doctrine is the destruction of the family, and religion.

6. These are two of the aims of the CPUSA (Communist Party, USA):

a. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce

b. . Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."



The aim is to reverse thousands of years of tradition....and they have been mightily successful.

We all suffer as we reap what they sowed political chick.

Did you see the article in post #56???

Well known celebrity rapes someone in his circle of acquaintances, and blithely moves on with no fear of exposure, arrest, or even contumely.

It's not just Russell Simmons, or Harvey Weinstein, or Bill Clinton....it's those who subscribe to Liberalism.
This is what they tell us must be accepted.

Astounding what they have done to the culture.

 

[alang1216]

It's not just Russell Simmons, or Harvey Weinstein, or Bill Clinton....it's those who subscribe to Liberalism.
This is what they tell us must be accepted.

Astounding what they have done to the culture.

Yet Weinstein was booted out and Weiner is in jail and plenty on the left are calling for Conyers to resign. Meanwhile Trump is still untouched and the conservative voters in AL seem ready to elect Roy Moore. Have Trump voters and AL Republicans subscribed to Liberalism?

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's not just Russell Simmons, or Harvey Weinstein, or Bill Clinton....it's those who subscribe to Liberalism.
This is what they tell us must be accepted.

Astounding what they have done to the culture.

Yet Weinstein was booted out and Weiner is in jail and plenty on the left are calling for Conyers to resign. Meanwhile Trump is still untouched and the conservative voters in AL seem ready to elect Roy Moore. Have Trump voters and AL Republicans subscribed to Liberalism?

Why do you suppose that is suddenly true, attributing the criminal behavior.... when your folks denied the facts and alibied the rapist Clinton for twenty years?

I have a theory....what's your explanation?