Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I understand that the Constitution of the US says very clearly that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.People are obligated to understand rights before they can be truly free to exercise them.
One thing about you stupid uneducated Moon Bats. You don't know any more about History than you know about Economics, Biology, Climate Science, Ethics or the Constitution.
You are wrong.
Communism is rooted and besed entirely on absolute dictatorship and cannot exist withou it.
COmmunism is not based on communal standards or cooperation it is strictly a political system of tyrannical violence imposed on others.
Capitalists are the opposite and reject dictatorships
Commies and those who think communism is wonderful are anti American pussies.
I understand that the Constitution of the US says very clearly that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Most of the Moon Bats don't understand what the phrase "shall not be infringed means". Too complicated for them.
WrongNonsense.
The history of communism if like agricultureal cooperatives, like the Kibbutzim in Israel.
Communism never has been dictatorial and there is no way it could be communal, collective, or cooperative if it was not also democratic.
Capitalists on the other hand, are like Hitler, Napoleon, Ghengis Khan, Atilla the Hun, or any dictator who is profit motivated.
I don't generally think you're an idiot but this post has me wondering.I think communism is wonderful, although no one has ever done it on a scale larger than a small tribe.
And communism is totally contrary to gun control, which only a fascist dictatorship would support.
Have you actually read the Communist Manifesto? Well, of course you haven't; your ignorance on the topic is quite apparent. And I'm no longer wondering. I take back all the posts where I didn't think you were an idiot. I am embarrassed that I didn't see you for what you were on your first post. You really are an ignorant idiot.Wrong.
Communism is collective, collaborative, and communal, which pretty much requires a democratic republic.
Stalin killed all the communists and created a capitalist paradise for him and his wealthy elite.
You stupid uneducated Moon Bats don't under the Constitution anymore than you don't understand History, Biology, Economics, Climate Science or Ethics.Shall not be infringed means it us up to the states and individuals as to what gun rights should be.
The federal government is pretty much prohibited any jurisdiction on firearms at all.
I grew up in the USA. Yes I know what communism is. And yes we worked hard and paid for everything we had. Unlike you spoiled Dems who think communism is good. Fuck off.You have no idea what communism is.
When you grew up, was your family operating on the profit motive, where you had to pay for your room and board?
If not, then your family was communist.
YepHave you actually read the Communist Manifesto? Well, of course you haven't; your ignorance on the topic is quite apparent. And I'm no longer wondering. I take back all the posts where I didn't think you were an idiot. I am embarrassed that I didn't see you for what you were on your first post. You really are an ignorant idiot.
Wrong, idiot.Nonsense.
The history of communism if like agricultureal cooperatives, like the Kibbutzim in Israel.
Communism never has been dictatorial and there is no way it could be communal, collective, or cooperative if it was not also democratic.
Capitalists on the other hand, are like Hitler, Napoleon, Ghengis Khan, Atilla the Hun, or any dictator who is profit motivated.
And I'm a freedom of the press lover and without the second amendment the first amendments time will be up as well...especially if arguments like "antiquated" are deemed valid...I am also a gun lover, but the 2nd Amendment will be changed. It's just a matter of time...
I shouldn't do your work for you but, knowing you're a communist, you can't possibly be expected to use your own brain so I'll lay it out for you.Nonsense.
The history of communism if like agricultureal cooperatives, like the Kibbutzim in Israel.
Communism never has been dictatorial and there is no way it could be communal, collective, or cooperative if it was not also democratic.
Capitalists on the other hand, are like Hitler, Napoleon, Ghengis Khan, Atilla the Hun, or any dictator who is profit motivated.
Wrong.
Communism is collective, collaborative, and communal, which pretty much requires a democratic republic.
Stalin killed all the communists and created a capitalist paradise for him and his wealthy elite.
California Bill Would Allow Citizens To Enforce Weapons Ban
A California bill would allow private citizens to go after gun makers in the same way Texas allows them to target abortion providers.
I shouldn't do your work for you but, knowing you're a communist, you can't possibly be expected to use your own brain so I'll lay it out for you.
Agricultural cooperatives are as capitalistic as it gets. Individual "bourgeois" farmers, each owning their own production, get together to sell their own property and reap the rewards of that sale.
They don't take the hundred acres of wheat from one farmer, and a thousand acres of wheat from another farmer, combine them and give each farmer 550 acres of profit. That would be communism, if they did that. Well, actually in communism, even bastardized enough to give anything to the farmer, might take 1100 acres of total production from two farmers, give each the profit from 5 acres and keep 1090 acres of profit for the state.
In communism, the state would own not only the farms but all of the tools and everything it took to get food from the soil. The proletariat would not be permitted to grow a single grain, a single carrot, or anything else, for their own consumption. There would be no bourgeois; only the proletariat. Every grain harvested would belong to the state and would be redistributed (think the USSR's law of spikelets and the famine that killed perhaps 10 million or more).
In capitalism, the proletariat can work hard, earn and own land, and become part of the bourgeois. In communism, there is no bourgeois, only the State (think USSR) and the poor proletariat. There is no hope, or even plan or design, that the proletariat can improve his lot in life by skill or hard work or by any other means other than selling out their neighbor proletarians for collecting leftover grain after the field is harvested.
In the Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels make it very plain that, in their view, the proletariat spend their labor supporting the bourgeois and that communism is completely different: because in communism the proletariat spend their labor in supporting the state. So how exactly did the life of the proletariat change?
On the surface, the state of the proletariat didn't change. All that happened is the Marxists stole the legally and hard-earned property of the bourgeois but the proletariat is, at best in communism, still the slave to the labor he can provide. But if you dig a little deeper, you find that, as demonstrated in the famine in the USSR, the condition of the proletariat gets much, much worse under communism.
The capitalist invests time, money, energy, and brain power to build ways to get more wheat from the same ground, making more wheat available for everyone. They invent tractors, improved varieties, mapping systems to know how every single square foot of their farm is producing, computerized irrigation, and more. For the communist, though, none of this ever comes to pass. Where the Soviet Union had some of these things, it was only based on what designs and intellectual property they could steal. They couldn't improve it or invent it. Under capitalism, even for those that choose not to work to become part of the bourgeois, the life of the proletariat continuously improves. For the communist, enough to stay alive, to simply exist, is the best for which they can hope.
In communism, the state police (think KGB and Stasi) are absolutely necessary. The state must have the means to enforce the will of the state and to ensure that theft for personal consumption of state property, even a single grain of wheat, does not happen. The consequences must be severe and the people must be afraid of the state.
Ask the people in Venezuela how they feel about that.What you describe is socialism, not Communism.
Under Communism there is no state. All things are owned in common. More precisely there is no property. So there would be no farm per se. People would just wander by and plant things for the good of the community. They might or might not stay around and harvest the crops. If they do, they have no more claim to eat that a bum in the gutter does.
In a Marxian fantasy world, people want to toil in the sun without reward because they care about the community. Under the absurd fantasy, there is so much produced by people with no incentive to produce that there is an abundance and no one worries about food or shelter. Free hotels that were built by people who just felt like it provide shelter for all. Free kitchens with cooks who just feel like making and serving food feed everyone. Someone will do the dishes just because they love the community.
Ask the people in Venezuela how they feel about that.
