So the founders got it wrong.....but you got it right?
You said so yourself, that "the founders killed gays, but Christians today don't." Or, "I'm right, the Founders are wrong." So yes, they did get it wrong. And what of yourself? Do you believe you're correct also? We got it right by learning not summarily execute gays for being gay. Yes, I did get it right. If God makes his will clear, in stated text, then the issue for me is not debatable. Marriage is between a man and a woman.
You're kinda demonstrating my point here. And that's limiting ourselves to one faith in a very similar cultural and historical tradition as your own, using essentially identical text.
If I go to the microwave and make a bag of popcorn according to some random interpretation of the stated instructions on the bag, I may burn the popcorn. If I follow the instructions to the letter, I'm sitting comfortably with a bag of Pop Secret watching cat videos on YouTube. I admit that I am a little too absolute with my interpretation of the Bible, but there are things in the Bible that don't need to be interpreted. It's views, God's view, that marriage is between a man and a woman is one of these things. Not negotiable.
If we venture even slightly outside this, things get even muddier. And when we start working between religions, muddier still.
What is the implication here? That we mold ourselves to be as acceptable as other religions are to gay marriage? To make ourselves more "acceptable" to others and not to God?
For example....why aren't modern Christians killing gays as the Bible commands?
You are citing Leviticus 20, or part of the Mosaic Laws. Some of the old laws in the Old Testament were only meant to be temporary, others permanent. The 613 Mosaic Laws consisted of the ceremonial, the civil, and the moral law.
The ceremonial law applied only to the worship practices of the Israelites. Jesus rendered those ceremonial laws unnecessary by coming to fulfill them. He didn't abolish them, he made them unnecessary. The
principles behind the ceremonial law are still applicable to us today, that is, the principles of worshiping and serving a holy God.
The civil law governed the everyday living of the Israelites. These laws served as a means to separate, to distinguish the Jews from the Gentiles, while providing the Gentiles with an example of how a holy people must live and behave. When Christ came to fulfill the law, he eliminated the distinction between Jew and Gentile, and held all of them accountable under the civil law, minus the death penalty.
The moral law is that which consists of the Ten Commandments which we are still bound to, as they serve as a basis for our holy living. These commandments are rather straight forward.
God held only Israel accountable for breaking the law, as stated in Leviticus 18:24-30. Meaning, apropos to the wider implications of your argument, that gays aren't supposed to be killed for their...how can I put this politely...way of life. The rest of the laws are still applicable, in some sort of way, none of which consists of killing people for breaking Old Testament law. The Bible says homosexuality is sinful, and it punished the Gentiles for engaging in it. In Romans 6:23, it offers a chance of redemption, an offer of forgiveness from God, through Jesus in order to be spared the death that they, as all sinners, would rightfully deserve in the eyes of God.
"
Now before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned until the coming faith would be revealed. So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian, for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ."
Galatians 3:23-27
So, why do we not kill gays for being gay? We just don't. Not anymore, nor should we have ever. Jesus paid the death penalty for all the breaches of the old law, and replaced the death penalty with an offer of forgiveness. There's no need to kill someone on the spot anymore for committing a sin against God. They need only ask for forgiveness. This proves that the Founders were wrong, and did not acknowledge the forgiveness that could be imparted by the grace of God. To be a little blunt, they didn't read the entire Bible.
'Him shall ye kill' is pretty straight forward.
According to your interpretation. But like I said just earlier, that death penalty was annulled, paid for by the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Yet you've found other passages elsewhere that you believe override the clear language of the Bible and relieve of the obligation to follow a very clear commandment.
No, I just considered their verses in the context they were written. And the context provided elsewhere by the Bible. I'm not picking and choosing, Skylar, for I do acknowledge the impact of the Old Law on our daily living. But that not all of it applies to us today.