Republicans pretend that no one knows they are lying...

[Crepitus]

The King Charles speech before the Congress exposed them for what they truly are - lying hypocrites.

When the King spoke of the need to defend Ukraine, they stood in unanimous applause. And you thought they were on the side of the Russians

And when the King spoke of the Magna Carta and it's call for checks and balances and to hold kings and executives accountable, they stood and applauded as if they had not thrown the checks and balances into the crapper? What is their position?

And when he spoke of the many years of NATO and our alliances, Republicans cheered as if they have not echoed the sentiments of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in their desire to destroy NATO. What are people supposed to believe?

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

Or are they simply two-faced hypocrites?

 

[Mac1958]

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

The party has become so gnarled by its clueless great leader that I don't think it knows up from down.

And now, inevitably, some of its parts are turning on other parts.

 

[1srelluc]

Did they wear their little no kings pins while they enthusiastically stood & clapped for an actual King?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

The King Charles speech before the Congress exposed them for what they truly are - lying hypocrites.

When the King spoke of the need to defend Ukraine, they stood in unanimous applause. And you thought they were on the side of the Russians

And when the King spoke of the Magna Carta and it's call for checks and balances and to hold kings and executives accountable, they stood and applauded as if they had not thrown the checks and balances into the crapper? What is their position?

And when he spoke of the many years of NATO and our alliances, Republicans cheered as if they have not echoed the sentiments of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in their desire to destroy NATO. What are people supposed to believe?

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

Or are they simply two-faced hypocrites?

Since you’re too retarded to figure it out let me explain.

We want Ukraine to win. We don’t want to be their bottomless pit cash cow, we don’t need any more dependents to support. Win the war with our help and get your shit together.

Same with NATO, we like NATO but those lazy ***** don’t get a free ride. Pay your share, do your share or **** off.

Checks and balances yes, absolute mindless obstruction? **** off. We’ve had with you idiots blocking everything because you want to pay for illegals. Your judges can also **** off with their retarded bullshit.

 

[Crepitus]

Since you’re too retarded to figure it out let me explain.

We want Ukraine to win. We don’t want to be their bottomless pit cash cow, we don’t need any more dependents to support. Win the war with our help and get your shit together.

Same with NATO, we like NATO but those lazy ***** don’t get a free ride. Pay your share, do your share or **** off.

Checks and balances yes, absolute mindless obstruction? ** off. We’ve had with you idiots blocking everything because you want to pay for illegals. Your judges can also ** off with their retarded bullshit.

You just did exactly the same thing and you are too well conditioned to know it.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

The King Charles speech before the Congress exposed them for what they truly are - lying hypocrites.

When the King spoke of the need to defend Ukraine, they stood in unanimous applause. And you thought they were on the side of the Russians

And when the King spoke of the Magna Carta and it's call for checks and balances and to hold kings and executives accountable, they stood and applauded as if they had not thrown the checks and balances into the crapper? What is their position?

And when he spoke of the many years of NATO and our alliances, Republicans cheered as if they have not echoed the sentiments of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in their desire to destroy NATO. What are people supposed to believe?

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

Or are they simply two-faced hypocrites?

First off, when visiting royalty is introduced into the chamber, "you stand." It doesn't matter what political side you are on. It's a required courtesy. Second, the only reason I can determine as to why the left side was giving standing ovations to the King, was because he and his Prime Minister have done what the left wants here, "have wide open borders," letting in the world's dangerous garbage that is determined to wipe out the native inhabitants and replace them. As a result of their actions, this result will happen, so the left is giddy to see him (despite their No Kings rallies).
As to those on the right side of the chamber, I could see where they would cheer at his statement about the long-time relationship, we've had with the UK since kicking them out of here, in 1789, beyond that, I haven't a clue.

 

[Yarddog]

First off, when visiting royalty is introduced into the chamber, "you stand." It doesn't matter what political side you are on. It's a required courtesy. Second, the only reason I can determine as to why the left side was giving standing ovations to the King, was because he and his Prime Minister have done what the left wants here, "have wide open borders," letting in the world's dangerous garbage that is determined to wipe out the native inhabitants and replace them. As a result of their actions, this result will happen, so the left is giddy to see him (despite their No Kings rallies).
As to those on the right side of the chamber, I could see where they would cheer at his statement about the long-time relationship, we've had with the UK since kicking them out of here, in 1789, beyond that, I haven't a clue.

They also have great deal of censorship aimed at the common man.

 

[berg80]

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

Yes to the first, no to the second. They are on trump's side. If that means supporting a position today and renouncing it tomorrow, so be it. If it means having trump's interests in mind but not the country's, so be it. If it means violating their oath of office and disowning the Constitution, so be it.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

They also have great deal of censorship aimed at the common man.

The British Patriots are censored more than the Muslims there. As the Brits say, it's become a two-tier justice system. One (more oppressive) for the patriotic Brits and one (less oppressive) for the Muslims. Hence the UK has lost to Islam.