Republicans pretend that no one knows they are lying...

[Crepitus]

The King Charles speech before the Congress exposed them for what they truly are - lying hypocrites.

When the King spoke of the need to defend Ukraine, they stood in unanimous applause. And you thought they were on the side of the Russians

And when the King spoke of the Magna Carta and it's call for checks and balances and to hold kings and executives accountable, they stood and applauded as if they had not thrown the checks and balances into the crapper? What is their position?

And when he spoke of the many years of NATO and our alliances, Republicans cheered as if they have not echoed the sentiments of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in their desire to destroy NATO. What are people supposed to believe?

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

Or are they simply two-faced hypocrites?

 

[Mac1958]

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

The party has become so gnarled by its clueless great leader that I don't think it knows up from down.

And now, inevitably, some of its parts are turning on other parts.

 

[1srelluc]

Did they wear their little no kings pins while they enthusiastically stood & clapped for an actual King?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

The King Charles speech before the Congress exposed them for what they truly are - lying hypocrites.

When the King spoke of the need to defend Ukraine, they stood in unanimous applause. And you thought they were on the side of the Russians

And when the King spoke of the Magna Carta and it's call for checks and balances and to hold kings and executives accountable, they stood and applauded as if they had not thrown the checks and balances into the crapper? What is their position?

And when he spoke of the many years of NATO and our alliances, Republicans cheered as if they have not echoed the sentiments of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in their desire to destroy NATO. What are people supposed to believe?

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

Or are they simply two-faced hypocrites?

Since you’re too retarded to figure it out let me explain.

We want Ukraine to win. We don’t want to be their bottomless pit cash cow, we don’t need any more dependents to support. Win the war with our help and get your shit together.

Same with NATO, we like NATO but those lazy ***** don’t get a free ride. Pay your share, do your share or **** off.

Checks and balances yes, absolute mindless obstruction? **** off. We’ve had with you idiots blocking everything because you want to pay for illegals. Your judges can also **** off with their retarded bullshit.

 

[Crepitus]

Since you’re too retarded to figure it out let me explain.

We want Ukraine to win. We don’t want to be their bottomless pit cash cow, we don’t need any more dependents to support. Win the war with our help and get your shit together.

Same with NATO, we like NATO but those lazy ***** don’t get a free ride. Pay your share, do your share or **** off.

Checks and balances yes, absolute mindless obstruction? ** off. We’ve had with you idiots blocking everything because you want to pay for illegals. Your judges can also ** off with their retarded bullshit.

You just did exactly the same thing and you are too well conditioned to know it.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

The King Charles speech before the Congress exposed them for what they truly are - lying hypocrites.

When the King spoke of the need to defend Ukraine, they stood in unanimous applause. And you thought they were on the side of the Russians

And when the King spoke of the Magna Carta and it's call for checks and balances and to hold kings and executives accountable, they stood and applauded as if they had not thrown the checks and balances into the crapper? What is their position?

And when he spoke of the many years of NATO and our alliances, Republicans cheered as if they have not echoed the sentiments of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in their desire to destroy NATO. What are people supposed to believe?

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

Or are they simply two-faced hypocrites?

First off, when visiting royalty is introduced into the chamber, "you stand." It doesn't matter what political side you are on. It's a required courtesy. Second, the only reason I can determine as to why the left side was giving standing ovations to the King, was because he and his Prime Minister have done what the left wants here, "have wide open borders," letting in the world's dangerous garbage that is determined to wipe out the native inhabitants and replace them. As a result of their actions, this result will happen, so the left is giddy to see him (despite their No Kings rallies).
As to those on the right side of the chamber, I could see where they would cheer at his statement about the long-time relationship, we've had with the UK since kicking them out of here, in 1789, beyond that, I haven't a clue.

 

[Yarddog]

First off, when visiting royalty is introduced into the chamber, "you stand." It doesn't matter what political side you are on. It's a required courtesy. Second, the only reason I can determine as to why the left side was giving standing ovations to the King, was because he and his Prime Minister have done what the left wants here, "have wide open borders," letting in the world's dangerous garbage that is determined to wipe out the native inhabitants and replace them. As a result of their actions, this result will happen, so the left is giddy to see him (despite their No Kings rallies).
As to those on the right side of the chamber, I could see where they would cheer at his statement about the long-time relationship, we've had with the UK since kicking them out of here, in 1789, beyond that, I haven't a clue.

They also have great deal of censorship aimed at the common man.

 

[berg80]

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

Yes to the first, no to the second. They are on trump's side. If that means supporting a position today and renouncing it tomorrow, so be it. If it means having trump's interests in mind but not the country's, so be it. If it means violating their oath of office and disowning the Constitution, so be it.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

They also have great deal of censorship aimed at the common man.

The British Patriots are censored more than the Muslims there. As the Brits say, it's become a two-tier justice system. One (more oppressive) for the patriotic Brits and one (less oppressive) for the Muslims. Hence the UK has lost to Islam.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

No kings........right? Hypocrites.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

You just did exactly the same thing and you are too well conditioned to know it.

I somehow knew it would go right over your head.

 

[Clipper]

The King Charles speech before the Congress exposed them for what they truly are - lying hypocrites.

When the King spoke of the need to defend Ukraine, they stood in unanimous applause. And you thought they were on the side of the Russians

And when the King spoke of the Magna Carta and it's call for checks and balances and to hold kings and executives accountable, they stood and applauded as if they had not thrown the checks and balances into the crapper? What is their position?

And when he spoke of the many years of NATO and our alliances, Republicans cheered as if they have not echoed the sentiments of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in their desire to destroy NATO. What are people supposed to believe?

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

Or are they simply two-faced hypocrites?

They''re not two faced hypocrites. They're gutless two faced hypocrites. They dared not to insult King Charles in public by not applauding his remarks, so just for show & to save face they applauded. Now that KC is gone they can return to thair old ways of being craven gutless Trump bootlickers who are an insult to thair oath of office & The Constituion.

 

[ColonelAngus]

#NOKINGS

 

[Harry Dresden]

both sides are pretty hypocritical....the only people that dont see that are the die hards on both sides....

 

[BluesLegend]

No kings........right? Hypocrites.

Is it really hypocrisy when No Kings is full on FAKE BS they use just to smear Trump? None of those dumb asses actually believe it, but there's no LIE they won't use to smear their opponents the rat scum!

Democrats are the masters of DECEPTION!

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Is it really hypocrisy when No Kings is full on FAKE BS they use just to smear Trump? None of those dumb asses actually believe it, but there's no LIE they won't use to smear their opponents the rat scum!

Democrats are the masters of DECEPTION!

There is no substance within the dems. Mainly, evil, hate, and violence. Very sad.

 

[Darkwind]

The King Charles speech before the Congress exposed them for what they truly are - lying hypocrites.

When the King spoke of the need to defend Ukraine, they stood in unanimous applause. And you thought they were on the side of the Russians

And when the King spoke of the Magna Carta and it's call for checks and balances and to hold kings and executives accountable, they stood and applauded as if they had not thrown the checks and balances into the crapper? What is their position?

And when he spoke of the many years of NATO and our alliances, Republicans cheered as if they have not echoed the sentiments of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in their desire to destroy NATO. What are people supposed to believe?

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

Or are they simply two-faced hypocrites?

The same Magna Carta that the King trashed not a month later? That Magna Carter?

 

[Clyde 154]

The King Charles speech before the Congress exposed them for what they truly are - lying hypocrites.

When the King spoke of the need to defend Ukraine, they stood in unanimous applause. And you thought they were on the side of the Russians

And when the King spoke of the Magna Carta and it's call for checks and balances and to hold kings and executives accountable, they stood and applauded as if they had not thrown the checks and balances into the crapper? What is their position?

And when he spoke of the many years of NATO and our alliances, Republicans cheered as if they have not echoed the sentiments of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in their desire to destroy NATO. What are people supposed to believe?

Do the Republicans know what side they are on? Are they that confused?

Or are they simply two-faced hypocrites?

The US is no UNCLER SUCKER: Hegseth.Let's see what happens when the United States removes all military from the European Theater. No missile shield against Russia or Islamic terrorism..........no US troops standing between Europe and attack.

https://www.stripes.com/theaters/europe/2025-02-13/hegseth-nato-spending-ukraine-168173398.html

Truth: The US is not providing support to Ukraine? Really? Without the defense provided by the US military (missile shield and troops on the ground throughout Europe) Russia would have walked through Ukraine like water coming off a duck's back. The reason that Russia does not use its weapons of most destruction is because they know the threat provided by the US military.

 

[Billiejeens]

Since you’re too retarded to figure it out let me explain.

We want Ukraine to win. We don’t want to be their bottomless pit cash cow, we don’t need any more dependents to support. Win the war with our help and get your shit together.

Same with NATO, we like NATO but those lazy ***** don’t get a free ride. Pay your share, do your share or **** off.

Checks and balances yes, absolute mindless obstruction? ** off. We’ve had with you idiots blocking everything because you want to pay for illegals. Your judges can also ** off with their retarded bullshit.

No one can make the creepy one understand sense.

Its just not in the playbook.

 

[Billiejeens]

Yes to the first, no to the second. They are on trump's side. If that means supporting a position today and renouncing it tomorrow, so be it. If it means having trump's interests in mind but not the country's, so be it. If it means violating their oath of office and disowning the Constitution, soplayback.

Nailed it.


No, not really