The probability of a Comey conviction on at least one count

[Conservative from Georgia]

I have already answered it. And you just don’t like the answer. Tough shit on you? lib.

Your boundless willingness to lie, repeatedly, about it doesn’t change anything.

No you didn’t, and you didn’t answer the question of whether you still love Fox News:

Legal analyst says there's no case against indicted James Comey | Fox Business

Fox News contributor Andrew McCarthy questions the strength of the case against former FBI Director James Comey, who was indicted for allegedly lying to Congress.

www.foxbusiness.com

 

[EMH]

Did Fox News freak you out?

Fox' coverage of W did. It was also the end of their credibility. When W socialized senior drugs in 2004, many libertarian conservatives like myself left the GOP as well. Fox News tried to spin that as "conservative." Many at Fox did not "discover" "fiscal conservatism" until 1/21/2009. Their definition of "conservative" is "a supporter of Zionist Fascism in Israel."

 

[BackAgain]

No you didn’t,

Yes. I clearly have. More than once. That remains true regardless of how often you repeat your lie, Lib.

and you didn’t answer the question of whether you still love Fox News:

Presumes I ever did love Fox News, Lib.

Legal analyst says there's no case against indicted James Comey | Fox Business

Fox News contributor Andrew McCarthy questions the strength of the case against former FBI Director James Comey, who was indicted for allegedly lying to Congress.

www.foxbusiness.com

I don’t care about that opinion.

Try harder. Cry harder, Lib.

 

[AntonToo]

Because I asked you for a link?

No dummy, because you make silly predictions about some plea deals you pull directly out of your ass when you don't even understand what the charges are about.

Comey supposedly fessing up to some sort of conspiracy-to-git'-Trump to avoid going to trial about Clinton leak is of course nonsense, like most of your posts.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Yes. I clearly have. More than once. That remains true regardless of how often you repeat your lie, Lib.

Presumes I ever did love Fox News, Lib.

I don’t care about that opinion.

Try harder. Cry harder, Lib.

BackAgain is disappointed in Fox News.
You’re pretending not to like because their expert thinks the Comey case is a BS case, while you’re pretending Comey lied.

 

[BackAgain]

No dummy, because you make silly predictions about some plea deals you pull directly out of your ass when you don't even understand what the charges are about.

Actually, I figured it out easily once I read the two count indictment. You’re the one still struggling.

That’s you libtardation on full display.

My prediction is just that. A prediction. It is informed by the charges and by the risks.

Plus, like you, Comey is a punk ass *****. He is almost a lock to fold.

Comey supposedly fessing up to some sort of conspiracy-to-git'-Trump to avoid going to trial about Clinton leak is of course nonsense, like most of your posts.

Wrong. It’s the most likely outcome.

But, you’re free to see things wrong. As always.

 

[BackAgain]

BackAgain is disappointed in Fox News.
You’re pretending not to like because their expert thinks the Comey case is a BS case, while you’re pretending Comey lied.

As always, when you have nothing intelligent or meritorious to add to the conversation, you resort to lying.

I rarely watch Fox News except for some Gutfeld and on Election nights or major breaking news. That’s just the way it is. Your doubt about that is just your ignorance talking.

I have never disliked Fox News. I still don’t.

And I disagree with their expert on this one. You like it so you attribute it to the entire Network. I guess you’re now a fan of Fox News. You silly shallow *****.

 

[skews13]

Judging by analysis by legal experts, it’s close to zero.

The fact that a prosecutors’ memo summarized that there was no probable cause, and that Trump keeps touting his desire for revenge in social media (The jury will be shown those posts) make this case, in my opinion, dead on arrival:

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/26/james-comey-indictment-flaws-00582920

Zip. Zero. Goose egg.

Thanks for playing.

 

[AntonToo]

Actually, I figured it out easily once I read the two count indictment. You’re the one still struggling.

That’s you libtardation on full display.

My prediction is just that. A prediction. It is informed by the charges and by the risks.

Plus, like you, Comey is a punk ass *****. He is almost a lock to fold.

Wrong. It’s the most likely outcome.

But, you’re free to see things wrong. As always.

Word diarrhea, when reality is you have nothing to say.

Pathetic.

 

[BackAgain]

Word diarrhea, when reality is you have nothing to say.

Pathetic.

Your attempt at playing critic is every bit as meaningful as you substance-less posts.

But you are indeed pathetic. Thanks for signing you crappy posting effort. But not really needed. We all see how pathetic you are.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

As always, when you have nothing intelligent or meritorious to add to the conversation, you resort to lying.

I rarely watch Fox News except for some Gutfeld and on Election nights or major breaking news. That’s just the way it is. Your doubt about that is just your ignorance talking.

I have never disliked Fox News. I still don’t.

And I disagree with their expert on this one. You like it so you attribute it to the entire Network. I guess you’re now a fan of Fox News. You silly shallow *****.

The fact you claim not to watch Fox News doesn't make a message board nickname more knowledgeable than the Fox News legal expert. Imagine if this legal expert went on Fox News and repeated your "Comey is in trouble because there's an indictment" crap.
You love Fox News by the way. stop making things up.

 

[BackAgain]

The fact you claim not to watch Fox News doesn't make a message board nickname more knowledgeable than the Fox News legal expert.

as if I had ever claimed any such thing.

Damn, you’re weak, Lib.

Imagine if this legal expert went on Fox News and repeated your "Comey is in trouble because there's an indictment" crap.

I usually agree with his analysis, so it wouldn’t be a surprise.

You love Fox News by the way. stop making things up.

I already told you how things are. Your expression of disbelief is irrelevant. As are you and almost all of your illogical and dishonest posting efforts.

 

[AntonToo]

Your attempt at playing critic is every bit as meaningful as you substance-less posts.

But you are indeed pathetic. Thanks for signing you crappy posting effort. But not really needed. We all see how pathetic you are.

Sure sure, you now can get back to your idiotic wet fantasies about Comey fessing up conspiracies against Trump.

 

[BackAgain]

Sure sure, you now can get back to your idiotic wet fantasies about Comey fessing up conspiracies against Trump.

It’s a prediction.

Go ahead and have nightmares.

But it’s more likely than not.

Going to trial under his circumstances would be insanity. Please root for the trial.

You’re now free to go cry harder.

 

[AntonToo]

It’s a prediction.

Go ahead and have nightmares.

But it’s more likely than not.

Going to trial under his circumstances would be insanity. Please root for the trial.

You’re now free to go cry harder.

it’s an stupid, ignorant, politico fantasy based prediction.

Your consistently post dumb nonsense that does not in any way address, or even acknowledge what you quote.

 

[BackAgain]

it’s an stupid, ignorant, politico fantasy based prediction.

No. It’s a sound prediction. (Which is far from a guarantee.) You just happen not to like that prediction. As to that, I couldn’t care less. You’re free to have your own opinions (even though yours are mostly delusional, based on your wishful thinking and abiding ignorance, as they always are).

Your consistently post dumb nonsense

You’re projecting again.

that does not in any way address, or even acknowledge what you quote.

That makes no sense. But then, you rarely do make sense.

I enjoy watching you brainless turds rush to defend Comey even though you clearly don’t understand what he did or even how what he did was wrong and criminal.

Muddle on, you hapless helpless hopeless hump.

 

[AntonToo]

No. It’s a sound prediction.

You just can't rationally explain what makes it "sound" and instead post piles of irrelevant save-face garbage.

 

[BackAgain]

You just can't rationally explain what makes it "sound" and instead post piles of irrelevant save-face garbage.

Wrong again. I already explained it.

You’re free to disagree. It’s of no significance to me what quibble or quibbles you seek to use to debate what I said.

Again, for the very stupid people (like you):

Comey did lie under oath to the U.S. Congress in a Senate hearing.

It wasn’t just a mistake. He knew ******* well that he had authorized his henchman to selectively leak FBI intel to the media yet his answer (under oath) to the Senator’s question was a denial.

You can sit there and continue to spin like a top — all day long. Nevertheless, The fact remains.

Therefore, if he chooses to actually go to trial, he is most likely to get convicted. You aren’t smart enough to recognize that very real risk. But I would assume that his lawyers are. And Comey is also intelligent enough to seek to avoid prison if he can.

And he can if he gets a plea offer which avoids such a sentence. But the government isn’t about to gift him any such thing. It will (again, most likely) require that he allocute fully as to what he did and why and with whom. It might even require that he become a government witness on not yet indicted cases and defendants.

 

[Lisa558]

What crimes

His secretary put the fee for the non-disclosure agreement under Legal Expenses.

 

[AntonToo]

Wrong again. I already explained it.

You’re free to disagree. It’s of no significance to me what quibble or quibbles you seek to use to debate what I said.

Again, for the very stupid people (like you):

Comey did lie under oath to the U.S. Congress in a Senate hearing.

It wasn’t just a mistake. He knew ******* well that he had authorized his henchman to selectively leak FBI intel to the media yet his answer (under oath) to the Senator’s question was a denial.

You can sit there and continue to spin like a top — all day long. Nevertheless, The fact remains.

Therefore, if he chooses to actually go to trial, he is most likely to get convicted. You aren’t smart enough to recognize that very real risk. But I would assume that his lawyers are. And Comey is also intelligent enough to seek to avoid prison if he can.

And he can if he gets a plea offer which avoids such a sentence. But the government isn’t about to gift him any such thing. It will (again, most likely) require that he allocute fully as to what he did and why and with whom. It might even require that he become a government witness on not yet indicted cases and defendants.

Not a single word of that made for a sane argument of wtf does a plea deal for a case about Hillary leak has to do with supposedly confessing something about Trump.

It all rests on your Trumptard fantasies of big bad conspiracy against him which ignores basic findings of Trump's own DOJ IG review that found that investigation was properly predicated and there was no serious evidence of political bias.