The probability of a Comey conviction on at least one count

[BackAgain]

Judging by analysis by legal experts, it’s close to zero.

The fact that a prosecutors’ memo summarized that there was no probable cause, and that Trump keeps touting his desire for revenge in social media (The jury will be shown those posts) make this case, in my opinion, dead on arrival:

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/26/james-comey-indictment-flaws-00582920

He is most likely to have to accept a plea offer whereby he will be required to not only admit that he lied to Congress but spell out why he did so, including the details of the entire conspiracy (naming names and dates and so forth).

Lib is no more of a conservative than is Obama or Soros or AOC or Bernie or Zamdani; and if he’s from Georgia, maybe he means the one over in Europe.

 

[AntonToo]

He is most likely to have to accept a plea offer whereby he will be required to not only admit that he lied to Congress but spell out why he did so, including the details of the entire conspiracy (naming names and dates and so forth).

Conspiracy...about what dummy? The Clinton foundation?

 

[BackAgain]

Conspiracy...about what dummy? The Clinton foundation?

No, you flaming asshole. The conspiracy to falsely attack the leader of their opposition political party.

Try to follow along, you scumbag.

 

[AntonToo]

No, you flaming asshole. The conspiracy to falsely attack the leader of their opposition political party.

Try to follow along, you scumbag.

....Comey was a Republican. Clinton was the leader of the party opposing his party.

The leak in question was about Clinton Foundation and had exactly nothing to do with attacking Trump.


When are you going to stop being a degenerate partisan tool already?

 

[BackAgain]

....Comey was a Republican.

So what? It’s not a get out of jail free card.

Clinton was the leader of the party opposing his party.

Trump was and is the leader of the Party whom he was opposing. And which Clinton are you bleating about?

The leak in question was about Clinton Foundation and had exactly nothing to do with attacking Trump.

Link?

When are you going to stop being a degenerate partisan tool already?

I never began so there’s nothing to “stop.”

Stop projecting so hard. It only exposes you so much more fully.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

He is most likely to have to accept a plea offer whereby he will be required to not only admit that he lied to Congress but spell out why he did so, including the details of the entire conspiracy (naming names and dates and so forth).

Lib is no more of a conservative than is Obama or Soros or AOC or Bernie or Zamdani; and if he’s from Georgia, maybe he means the one over in Europe.

Another not saying what Comey lied about. Because he doesn’t want to have to prove it.

 

[EMH]

Another not saying what Comey lied about. Because he doesn’t want to have to prove it.

Comey lied about an almost endless list of treasonous things. Russia was one. Hillary emails another. Whether FBI was sitting on a CO2 FRAUD prosecution is a third.

 

[EMH]

The Comey indictment is really a great outing of the "who's who" of the Zionist Fascist Big Government Left Wing PRO ISRAEL RINOs, because they are the ones siding with Comey here...

 

[BackAgain]

Another not saying what Comey lied about. Because he doesn’t want to have to prove it.

Wrong again, Lib

The indictment already spelled it out, as I have indeed already said.

Damn, you’re an obvious liar.

 

[AntonToo]

Link?

Comey charge involves his role in sharing info about Hillary Clinton-related probe: Sources

One of charges faced by ex-FBI Director James Comey focuses on his alleged role in the sharing of information about a probe related to Hillary Clinton, sources say.

abcnews.go.com

Yet again, you have no clue wtf you are talking about.

 

[BackAgain]

Comey charge involves his role in sharing info about Hillary Clinton-related probe: Sources

One of charges faced by ex-FBI Director James Comey focuses on his alleged role in the sharing of information about a probe related to Hillary Clinton, sources say.

abcnews.go.com

Yet again, you have no clue wtf you are talking about.

Because I asked you for a link?

Damn, you’re stupid.

In reality, what the underlying topic was is insignificant (like your brain). The thing that matters, you shitstain, is that he was asked a question by a U.S. Senator and lied — under oath.

The statute of limitations was about to expire. So the indictment needed to come quickly.

You scumbags excuse perjury when your pals engage in it (or in contempt of Congress). But we law-abiding people (like most of us on the right) don’t excuse it no matter who engages in it.

Also, Shrillary was never the actual leader of the Dim Party.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Wrong again, Lib

The indictment already spelled it out, as I have indeed already said.

Damn, you’re an obvious liar.

The indictment failed to state what lie Comey told. That’s why you want to even repeat it because you can’t.

 

[EMH]

The indictment failed to state what lie Comey told. That’s why you want to even repeat it because you can’t.

Then surely he will quickly get acquitted.... so why are you so freaked out by it...


LOL!!!!!

 

[BackAgain]

The indictment failed to state what lie Comey told. That’s why you want to even repeat it because you can’t.

It named it very precisely. Your imbecility and dishonesty are showing.

And, besides, such “concerns” get addressed a little further down the road, anyway, by the attorneys involved and the court.

See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(f).

All Comey’s lawyers need do is make the request if they are so inclined.

Next?

 

[Missourian]

So you belive it's BS that Russia illicitly hacked DNC emails and conducted electioneering in US for Trump's benefit?

You belive it's BS that Trump's campaign member lied to FBI about where he learned about Russians having Clinton's emails?

You belive it's BS that Trump's son and other Trump campaign officers sought Clinton compromat from Russian gov representatives?

You belive it's BS that Trump's campaign chair Manafort was in regular contact with a FSB agent and handed him campaign data?

You belive it's BS that Stone co-ordinated with Assange on email release timing?

You belive it's BS that Trump ran on a platform of removing sanctions on Russia and constantly flattered and defended Putin publicly?

You belive it's BS that Trump publicly and directly asked Russia to hack and find "30,000 missing Clinton emails"?

You belive it's BS that Trump own DOJ IG review found FBI's investigation into Trump's campaign cooperation with Russia was well predicated?


When you say "whole Russia thing" what the hell are you talking about exactly?

Only an idiot believes this nonsense. There is a mountain of evidence it was completely manufactured by the Clinton Campaign.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

It named it very precisely. Your imbecility and dishonesty are showing.

And, besides, such “concerns” get addressed a little further down the road, anyway, by the attorneys involved and the court.

See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(f).

All Comey’s lawyers need do is make the request if they are so inclined.

Next?

The alleged lie was not named and you can’t find it.

Only an idiot believes this nonsense. There is a mountain of evidence it was completely manufactured by the Clinton Campaign.

Only an idiot believes this nonsense. There is a mountain of evidence it was completely manufactured by the Clinton Campaign.

The Clinton

Then surely he will quickly get acquitted.... so why are you so freaked out by it...


LOL!!!!!

Did Fox News freak you out?

Legal analyst says there's no case against indicted James Comey | Fox Business

Fox News contributor Andrew McCarthy questions the strength of the case against former FBI Director James Comey, who was indicted for allegedly lying to Congress.

www.foxbusiness.com

 

[BackAgain]

The alleged lie was not named and you can’t find it.

It is in the very 1st count of the indictment. Even an imbecile like you can find it.

What you’re actually yammering about is the lack of specificity in the indictment.

Poor Comey would have to wonder which of his lies the indictment is addressing if he were not permitted to request a Bill of Particulars. But that will be provided sometime after Comey gets arraigned.

Cry harder, Lib.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

It is in the very 1st count of the indictment. Even an imbecile like you can find it.

What you’re actually yammering about is the lack of specificity in the indictment.

Poor Comey would have to wonder which of his lies the indictment is addressing if he were not permitted to request a Bill of Particulars. But that will be provided sometime after Comey gets arraigned.

Cry harder, Lib.

It’s not there and that’s why you refuse to say what the lie was. Because you can’t see it. Liar.

 

[BackAgain]

It’s not there and that’s why you refuse to say what the lie was. Because you can’t see it. Liar.

I have already answered it. And you just don’t like the answer. Tough shit on you? lib.

Your boundless willingness to lie, repeatedly, about it doesn’t change anything.

 

[BluesLegend]

Judging by analysis by legal experts, it’s close to zero.

The Comey trial will allow us to put countless Dem collaborators under oath and spawn 100 more Dem indictments.