Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Science was invented a long time before Galileo. The ancient Greeks had scientists. So did the ancient Egyptians and the ancient Chinese. So you're making a very ignorant statement.Except the notion that the earth was the center of the universe wasn't based upon science- and science hadn't even been invented yet.
That is like saying that the stories in the Bible were once considered settled science......
So your thread just doesn't make any sense.
Science was invented a long time before Galileo. The ancient Greeks had scientists. So did the ancient Egyptians and the ancient Chinese. So you're making a very ignorant statement.Except the notion that the earth was the center of the universe wasn't based upon science- and science hadn't even been invented yet.
That is like saying that the stories in the Bible were once considered settled science......
So your thread just doesn't make any sense.
Where in the Bible does it say the earth is the center of the universe?Except the notion that the earth was the center of the universe wasn't based upon science- and science hadn't even been invented yet.
That is like saying that the stories in the Bible were once considered settled science......
So your thread just doesn't make any sense.
Science was invented a long time before Galileo. The ancient Greeks had scientists. So did the ancient Egyptians and the ancient Chinese. So you're making a very ignorant statement.Except the notion that the earth was the center of the universe wasn't based upon science- and science hadn't even been invented yet.
That is like saying that the stories in the Bible were once considered settled science......
So your thread just doesn't make any sense.
The scientific method was not invented until the 17th century. The concept of the earth being the center of the universe was a matter of faith based upon the Bible- not based upon science.
My mistake- the Bible talks about the earth standing still but not that it is the center of the universe.Where in the Bible does it say the earth is the center of the universe?Except the notion that the earth was the center of the universe wasn't based upon science- and science hadn't even been invented yet.
That is like saying that the stories in the Bible were once considered settled science......
So your thread just doesn't make any sense.
I’ll wait.
The point is, all kinds of false theories became "settled science" until they were disproven later by other scientists.
God revealed, even before Man was advanced enough to understand, that the "earth hangs on nothing."My mistake- the Bible talks about the earth standing still but not that it is the center of the universe.Where in the Bible does it say the earth is the center of the universe?Except the notion that the earth was the center of the universe wasn't based upon science- and science hadn't even been invented yet.
That is like saying that the stories in the Bible were once considered settled science......
So your thread just doesn't make any sense.
I’ll wait.
I missed that part too. Fill us in.My mistake- the Bible talks about the earth standing still but not that it is the center of the universe.Where in the Bible does it say the earth is the center of the universe?Except the notion that the earth was the center of the universe wasn't based upon science- and science hadn't even been invented yet.
That is like saying that the stories in the Bible were once considered settled science......
So your thread just doesn't make any sense.
I’ll wait.
That was never "settled science". This is an idiotic thread. Typical Blackrook thread.... Pinch off a turd and disappear......so that argument doesn't even make any sense.
Shameless lie. You nutsacks will believe ANYTHING.They fired a professor for saying that polar bears are not an endangered species.
They fired a professor for saying that polar bears are not an endangered species.
That's how you enforce "settled science."
...so that argument doesn't even make any sense.