Ok...................how about the 14th and disqualifying Trump from office?There was no constitutional basis for Roe. That's why it was overturned.
What was the outcome?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok...................how about the 14th and disqualifying Trump from office?There was no constitutional basis for Roe. That's why it was overturned.
It was upheld. Thank you very much!Ok...................how about the 14th and disqualifying Trump from office?
What was the outcome?
You're wrong there Admiral..............Trump's in office...............It was upheld. Thank you very much!
The 14th Amendment was upheld in that it did not apply to anyone because Trump was not convicted of insurrection. The states were smacked down by the wording of the Amendment.You're wrong there Admiral..............Trump's in office...............
Article 14 section 3 What happened with that?
The 14th Amendment was upheld in that it did not apply to anyone because Trump was not convicted of insurrection.
You'll end up like Trump college.I am going to have to start charging tuition for these lessons.
Why are you continuously proving me correct? Trump is still President, is he not? You are trying to split hairs and using semantics to argue your point which is to say I am right!Wrong again. 14-3 only applies to officers of the US.
View attachment 1069342
You'll end up like Trump college.
Why are you continuously proving me correct?
You are trying to split hairs and using semantics to argue your point which is to say I am right!
Were the lawsuits successful? No.You claimed that under 14-3, Scotus said He didn't commit an insurrection, when in reality, Scotus said that article and section doesn't apply to presidents......
Actually you've shown you don't know what you're talking about.
Er, then why is Trump sitting in the White House at this very moment?It was upheld. Thank you very much!
The Scotus decision was..Were the lawsuits successful?
Not a suit. The lawsuit was denied.The Scotus decision was..
Keep squirming.Not a suit. The lawsuit was denied.
Oh, shut up! You lost the argument and are boring. Now. be a good boy and as the Brits say, "Bugger off!"Keep squirming.
What was the name of the lawsuit?
Sorry, Chat GPT, er Mariyam.
"Jacob Howard, author of the 14th amendment, in 1866, documented his objection in writing "[E]very person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of person."
Cite the lawsuit or shut the fuck up.......Oh, shut up! You lost the argument and are boring. Now. be a good boy and as the Brits say, "Bugger off!"
The practical problem is that it would create chaos. How many "Americans" became citizens under this rule? If it is reversed, does that call into question EVEN THEIR kids? Maybe. Any ruling in Trump's favor would only apply prospectively, and not to anyone who is already a citizen under this prior rule.
Predictions can end up biting you in the ass.All of this furor over an issue the conclusion of which will never result in an overturn of birthright citizenship.