One Of Trump's Unconstitutional EOs Is Being Raked Over the Coals By SCOTUS Tomorrow

[Unkotare]

...They are also targeting the children and trying to revoke their citizenship. ....

Where did you hear that?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Targeting illegal aliens? Isn't that the idea?

Is that why they are revoking student visas and trying to remove birthright citizenship and deporting people who are here legally, waiting for their amnesty hearings or who have protected status granted by the courts?

Unkotare, you have played dumb for too long, and you forgot to stop. Snap out of it.

 

[Unkotare]

Get this horseshit out of here. They are deporting people who are here legally. They are also trying to change the laws so that they can deport people who are currently CITIZENS. And you don't mind one bit. So you can put aside your bad acting that "the law" is why you want brown immigrants tossed out. You aren't fooling anyone, save for maybe yourself. You fking people... you've spent too much time jerking each other off, so now you think you fool everyone else, too.

Completely false.

 

[Unkotare]

Is that why they are revoking student visas ...

The government has every right to revoke a student visa. I have processed students visas a hundred times. It is very clearly spelled out that it can be revoked for any number of reasons. Nothing shocking or outrageous about it.

 

[Unkotare]

... trying to remove birthright citizenship ....

If that's what some people want, there are legal avenues to pursue that end. I don't think it will be successful, but they have every right to try.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Completely false.

Oops, you forgot to say which part and why.

See you in never, because those are all facts, and you just had a reflexive, emotional outburst. Take all the time you need. The facts will be waiting, when you return.

 

[Unkotare]

... deporting people who are here legally...

All within the purview of the federal government for any number of reasons. Giving aid and support to terrorist organizations certainly counts.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If that's what some people want, there are legal avenues to pursue that end. I don't think it will be successful, but they have every right to try.

There are no legal avenues besided a constitutional amendment. And corrupt judges who will equate boder crossers to foreign soldiers. Which, thankfully, seems to be a small minority of judges.

 

[Unkotare]

There are no legal avenues besided [sic] a constitutional amendment....

There are others. An amendment is the most likely and lasting, but not the only one.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

All within the purview of the federal government for any number of reasons.

A hilarious, blatant lie, as shown in the courts. Even the fat rapist's owm lawyers had to admit the mistakes, once they got into a coutroom and could not lie their asses off to the MAGAts, like they can in public.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There are others. An amendment is the most likely and lasting, but not the only one.

There are no others, save for corrupt judges equating border crossers to foreign soldiers. Which is why that's the ONLY talking point the fat rapist's lawyers have in the courts, regarding the AEA. And it is why they are judge shopping.

 

[Unkotare]

A hilarious, blatant lie, as shown in the courts. Even the fat rapist's owm [sic] lawyers had to admit the mistakes, once they got into a coutroom [sic] and could not lie their asses off to the MAGAts, like they can in public.

If someone is here on a student visa, that visa can be revoked at any time. Even people here with a permanent resident card can be removed depending on what they might do.

 

[Unkotare]

There are no others, save for ....

You don't see how "save for" contradicts yourself?

 

[excalibur]

Targeting illegal aliens? Isn't that the idea?

Soon, Dems and the left will start calling them 'misplaced personnel'.

 

[Wapasha]

First, the Constitution. Read it.

Next this:

Rule 65. Injunctions and Restraining Orders

www.law.cornell.edu

There is no exemption for the president.

You're welcome. I hope you weren't holding your breath.

Rule 65 provides the framework for injunctions, it doesn't explicitly authorize nationwide injunctions as we have been seeing since the 1960s.

Nothing in the U.S. Constitution authorizes nationwide or universal injunctions by district judges.

The Constitution created courts to resolve cases and controversies between parties, not to give judges authority to issue broad public policy edicts against official acts by the president.

 

[g5000]

Rule 65 provides the framework for injunctions, it doesn't explicitly authorize nationwide injunctions as we have been seeing since the 1960s.

Nothing in the U.S. Constitution authorizes nationwide or universal injunctions by district judges.

The Constitution created courts to resolve cases and controversies between parties, not to give judges authority to issue broad public policy edicts against official acts by the president.

The Constitution, eh? Ever hear of the 14th Amendment?

Trump's EO violates the Constitution.

The reason this birthright EO injunction was nationwide is because if it wasn't, you would end up with some children accepted as citizens in one state, and others not in other states.

And if a child moved from a state which recognizes birthright citizenship to a state that doesn't, what happens to his/her citizenship status?

A nationwide injunction is just plain common sense in some cases.

 

[Unkotare]

Our government came up with term "anchor baby" although they didn't put it in quite those terms. They referred to the practice of individuals entering the U.S. and having a child on U.S. soils as a means of "anchoring themselves into U.S. society and then using this "foothold" to bring in other family members.

I'll see if I can locate the source again.

Mom of 3, who fled to US to escape abuse, faces deportation after 20 years

Carol Mayorga's Missouri community, which largely supports President Donald Trump, has rallied to her defense.

www.newsweek.com

"Mayorga fled an abusive mother in Hong Kong and first entered the U.S. in 2004 on a visa. For nearly two decades, she lived in Kennett, working multiple jobs including at John's Waffle & Pancake House and raising three children, all U.S. citizens by birth."